Photoshopped surely , any dog isn't just gonna stand there for that.
I don’t think it’s a real dog.
Yes, monkeys should be in barrels, like nature intended it.
Only in America, land of the freeJust saw this story, from an incident that happened in 2020 of police screaming into the face of a 5yo child and handcuffing him amongst other things
https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-new...of-police-handcuffing-5-year-old-109200965560
@Ermintruder once described it "as if they're holding a sacred piece of toast" which I think is brilliant!speaking on their smartphone while holding it like a teeny-tiny tea tray in front of their face.
Well, we all have to make a crust, somehow....?"as if they're holding a sacred piece of toast"
Since I was trained in the day of the little inconsistent asymmetric pins in holes connections, I have always felt that there must be something wrong with USB plugs.Well, we all have to make a crust, somehow....?
All hail the piece of bread that passeth understanding. A communion wafer that will allow you to text The Almighty....
(We can safely-assume that God has a contract phone, and unlimited upgrades, or his omnipotence would be dimished).
Perhaps the Vatican Third Council will make a pronouncement upon whether IPhones are in reality over-priced and twee. And maybe consider the canonisation of the Nokia 9300 (I would assume that having non-human / semi-AI saints is an inevitable progression for those parts of the world that support such things).
Anyway, I can't help wondering if USB-C is really the work of the Devil himself. I mean, it all looks fine....and it'll go in either way round. But is it natural?
I've never understood the 'thing' they do of wandering along, speaking on their smartphone while holding it like a teeny-tiny tea tray in front of their face.
Is putting the speaker to the ear and the mic to the mouth such a hard concept to grasp?
To me it looks like they're about to eat a hot pop-tart. It just makes them look stupid. And if you're really worried about radiation from the phone, should you have a cell phone at all?@Ermintruder once described it "as if they're holding a sacred piece of toast" which I think is brilliant!
My thoughts precisely.It just makes them look stupid. And if you're really worried about radiation from the phone, should you have a cell phone at all?
I always assumed it was so that passers-by could hear the Very Important Nature of their call and treat them with the deference they clearly feel is their due. Or laugh at them for breaking their ankle stepping off a high kerb because they were paying so much attention to Dave's tale of his night out...To me it looks like they're about to eat a hot pop-tart. It just makes them look stupid. And if you're really worried about radiation from the phone, should you have a cell phone at all?
There is no such thing as 'too much' Star Trek.And there was I thinking it was because they had watched too much Star Trek...
View attachment 37386
Which brings us to the next level of self centeredness: putting the call on speaker when doing that.I always assumed it was so that passers-by could hear the Very Important Nature of their call and treat them with the deference they clearly feel is their due. Or laugh at them for breaking their ankle stepping off a high kerb because they were paying so much attention to Dave's tale of his night out...
But despite the similarity to a flip phone, the communicator was more like a speakerphone. BTW, you can buy a Bluetooth communicator, allowing you to use a phone sized object as a surrogate for your phone.And to be fair.....modern phones are more akin to tricorders than communicators.
Oh look. Someone is going to fire a weapon three times.And there was I thinking it was because they had watched too much Star Trek...
.
I hope this means that male recruits can now wear frillies.I just read this headline on the bbc red button
View attachment 37427
At first i thought 'wow thats progressive' then as i read the full story i was shocked by it, female recruits up until now were forced to wear standard issue squaddies scuddies.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-56581129
Im going for propaganda myself, im sure there were similar tales on all sides at the timeI hope this means that male recruits can now wear frillies.
I've seen British newspaper clippings from WW1 telling of a captured German pilot wearing ladies underwear under his uniform as well as a 'rouged face and lipstick'.
It's probably anti-German propaganda but you never know...
An empty vessel makes the most noise salt-man.Anyway WTF ery....
I come out for a quiet walk and every time there's some numpty indulging in loud phone conversations. If you're very lucky they're not holding the phone up in front of their face.
Can these people not shut up for 2 minutes together..? It's not like they have anything worthwhile to say
Nope - not in WW1. There were Russian female pilots (combat and non-combat) and allegedly also French female pilots (exact roles disputed), but no German ones (at least none documented).Possibly the german pilot was.....er.....female?