If I may be allowed to comment on some slightly stale and slightly off-topic posts (and don't worry, I'll get on topic)...
Therein lies the problem with modern technology - it fails, whereas a map never does.
The one situation where an accurate map does fail is when it's out of date. New roads get built and old ones are changed, blocked off, etc. I've had it happen to me a few times.
I've lost count of the times I've asked yoofs where they have been only to be told "Don't know just followed the sat nav". ( Usually followed by "Can't read a map").
When in strange places, I've always tried to find out where I am on the map, so to speak. I just don't understand people who only want directions
to a place, rather than an idea of where it is.
The worst example of this I've encountered recently was with a family at the local train station. They looked confused, so I offered my help. A woman asked if this was the right platform for the Ronkonkoma train. (Ronkonkoma is east of Mineola, where we were.) I pointed to the digital display that identifies trains by their terminal destinations and said yes, this is track 2, and that's the next train. Then a man (her husband, I assume) said "And that goes to Woodside?" while the woman held up her phone.
On the phone was a simple graphic: a straight line showing the stops for their train between Mineola and Woodside. An app or web site had told them to take a train on the Ronkonkoma
line to get to Woodside. Woodside, however, is
west of Mineola, in the direction of New York City. (One could also argue that mentioning the line was irrelevant, since several Long Island Railroad lines merge at or before Mineola.)
No, I said, most city-bound trains leave from the other platform on the other side. The man seemed quite distressed by the fact that ALL of them didn't. Finally he asked "Which way is Citi Field?" and I pointed in the direction of the train they wanted. Only after I left them did I realize they needed to transfer at Woodside to a different
westbound train - LIRR or subway - to get to Citi Field. I doubt they had a smooth trip.
Now you have to understand that anyone who lives around here should have a very good idea of where all these locations are in reference to where the conversation took place, and I don't think these people were from out of town. They just didn't bother to take a few more minutes to get an idea of where they were in relation to where they were going.
So getting back to timeslips and the Oz effect: could being very unaccustomed to figuring out where you
are, as opposed to how to get where you want to be, contribute to a predisposition to go all Oz-headed and concentrate only on the unfamiliar? After all, many alleged timeslips happen in unfamiliar locations.