Kate In The Desert
Devoted Cultist
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2018
- Messages
- 112
Thought I'd just pop in here to say that the time of the hearing on Tuesday, May 17 is 10 a.m. EDT.
They better, we are sick of all the violence, and I see reports of the Russians facing heavy losses in Ukraine.The news in the U.S. has not been good lately with mass shootings and the usual terrible world news.
I fear this UFO public hearing will be “ pushed to the back “ and be forgotten about.
Will the news media pick it up ?
I find it both annoying and frightening that we are paying these people to ignore us much of the time.I will not get my hopes up about the public UFO hearings because of two things.
One, I have been disappointed so many times from the past about the government giving out UFO information.
Secondly, the government will not give out classified information.
Then there is a small chance that the panel might do the right thing, but I doubt it.
Thought I'd just pop in here to say that the time of the hearing on Tuesday, May 17 is 10 a.m. EDT.
Does anyone know what was said ?
It must have been a real bust ?
It's almost as good as the JFK assassination information they release every so many years, in other words worthless. LOL!With my limited time I scanned the video, and “not enough data” is the “ new “ answer now.
But It was established there were 11 near misses with UAPs.
Here's a short, new clip showing a Navy 'plane flying past a UAP;
https://www.metabunk.org/data/video/50/50744-cd055f3be5a469fccea3a9fb1d43f3c5.m4v
...the object only appears in three frames towards the end, which Mick West has obligingly put into a single image.
View attachment 55394
...this looks to me just like the mylar toy balloon that was filmed in similar circumstances on a different occasion. The specular reflection from the silver balloon has created a circular 'bokeh' effect.
Really, the Navy needs better evidence than this if they expect us to be concerned about unknown 'incursions'.
Oh that would be wonderful! Would love to hear from actual pilots, they see more than we do.R-Tim Burchett U.S. Congressman has come out being very critical of the U.S. Congressional UFO public hearings.
Tim has told the news media that the hearings were a joke.
Tim claims knowledge of crashed UFO material.
Tim says all we do for years is “ just cover up “.
He wants another public hearing with the actual pilots.
A bunch of boring bastards pretending they don't know or they don't, don't knowI think the greatest comment about the U.S. Congressional UFO public hearings was from The Atlantic.
“ We have never seen a group of people work so hard to make the topic discussed so boring “.
If Rep. Burchett knows there's "crashed UFO material" he must have a good idea what it is, where it is, who's keeping it from us, etc. So why isn't he putting any energy in getting it released? Not another hearing, not a speech - a deliberate, focused demand that the people in charge release the info.R-Tim Burchett U.S. Congressman has come out being very critical of the U.S. Congressional UFO public hearings.
Tim has told the news media that the hearings were a joke.
Tim claims knowledge of crashed UFO material.
Tim says all we do for years is “ just cover up “.
He wants another public hearing with the actual pilots.
I must say I was particularly mystified by this series of sightings; at first I thought it was mostly misidentified airliners in the distance, like the Gatwick drone swarms. But the radar records suggested that something else was going on. These were real, small, nearby objects, at least some of the time.In our coverage of these incidents, we found increasingly clear evidence that the objects were drones. Numerous ship deck logs from the earliest incidents referred to the objects as UAS, UAV, or plainly as drones.
We later learned through the Freedom of Information Act that briefing slides from the USS Paul Hamilton were created shortly after one of the incidents. Those slides again referred to the objects as UAS, UAV and as a “UAS Swarm.”
Investigators, who were in a position to have a first-hand description of the objects, questioned civilians believed to be in possession of drones and in proximity to the ships at the time of the incident.
In parallel, investigators also sought to deconflict with the Navy’s own drone operations in the area. Flight logs shared with the investigators appeared to rule out a case of mistaken identity with Navy assets.
Drone incidents continued to occur even after the launch of the Navy’s initial investigation. Deck logs again referred to the objects as drones and indicated that radiofrequency signals had been detected from them.
That's exactly what I've been wondering for years.Mike claims the idea of UFOs are us from the future should have been discussed.
I think it's fine to discuss such things here, and I'm sure interested scientists have discussed it among themselves hypothetically, but there seems little point in theorising about such things officially when there isn't even a testable model of the effects of causality violation to work from.Mike claims the idea of UFOs are us from the future should have been discussed.