Sabresonic
Justified & Ancient
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2020
- Messages
- 1,230
You can tell from my post I had 1 too many but I totally agree with you.I know it is a ridiculous frustrating topic, but I am not giving up.
You can tell from my post I had 1 too many but I totally agree with you.I know it is a ridiculous frustrating topic, but I am not giving up.
I hope not but then again wouldn't trust anything that comes out of Pentagon etcThe U.S. Defense Bill requires an annual Pentagon UFO/UAP report on Halloween October 31st.
A classified report will go to Congress, and a unclassified report will go to the public.
Rumors are that the unclassified public report will try to put down and squash any ideas that UFO/UAPs are real, blaming this situation on “ atmosphere junk “ and run-a-way weather balloons.
Are we back in the 1950s with “ Project Blue Book “ ?
We are about to see the biggest “ con “ job.
Some reports suggest that Mick West and Metabunk have largely got it right, and the Navy UAP film clips are all explainable by relatively mundane phenomena. I expected as much: honestly, we should be grateful for their efforts.Rumors are that the unclassified public report will try to put down and squash any ideas that UFO/UAPs are real, blaming this situation on “ atmosphere junk “ and run-a-way weather balloons.
Well of course it doesn't mean they are extraterrestrial, but I suppose some people need to have that spelled out. Someone once said - can't think who! - "nothing is inexplicable, merely unexplained". And to interpret that, in the case of some of those unexplained reports, the ultimate explanation just might be that they are indeed extraterrestrial, it's just we don't have any way to prove it yet. And of course some of the unexplained reports could have more mundane explanations.Waiting for the annual Pentagon UFO report, but insiders are claiming that this report will claim that out of 366 reporting sightings this year that the UFO Office looked into, 150 have no explanation.
This report will say no explanation does not mean extraterrestrial.
Well, there have been a few examples of Navy witnesses reporting spy drones, some of which appear to be associated with Chinese shipping. But spy drones haven't really been responsible for more than a small fraction of the total reports so far - this may change, especially since drones are being developed and built in every nation with significant military ambitions.China is going to be a large part of the reason why we see UFOs.
I could as If we can handle horrors of normal life be it war, job loss, lockdown, rising costs, domestic abuse etc etc then Aliens being real be great but then I would trust the Pentagon.Does anyone think the world could handle it if the pentagon said yes we have been visited and possibly had contact with them?
If there was a cover-up, then we should expect a 'new initiative' to involve NASA and something along the lines that 'there will be a thorough investigation'.This report will say no explanation does not mean extraterrestrial.
... Why did Bill Nelson ignore the Pentagon UFO Office established under the Defense Bill and go out on his own? ...
But what's $100,000 going to prove UFO's...if Aliens are amongst us they show up ?..which they do but I'm 16 years following about it and wish I know and all the chanting and prey done sweet FAEnolaGaia,
I agree with you that NASA should be the organization to investigate UFOs.
As a side note, Congress was “ pissed “ that Bill Nelson went “ rogue “.
Congress gave Bill Nelson a ridiculous small budget and a specific time limit to come up with his UFO report.
I could be wrong but $100,000 and a report published by deadline early summer.
When I like something I research it be it music, sport, youth culture etc and find out the history and everything but with Ghosts, Time Slips, UFO's and like else where but I'm none the wiser and it's frustrating.I agree Sabresonic,
Since my first UFO sighting when I was 11 years old, after all these years there has been zero progress in the understanding of the UFO phenomenon.
I don’t think anything will change at all.
If there's a question to be asked, it's the reverse:
"Why did DOD ignore NASA's mission responsibility for all things aeronautical / space-related and set up their own office to review UFO incidents?"
In other words, NASA can easily justify interest in UFO matters in relation to its institutional mission. It's more difficult to justify dedicating a defense-related office to such matters.
In the context of NASA's mission(s) a general interest in demonstrable or prospective flight or space phenomena is straightforward.
In the context of DOD's mission(s) such phenomena are relevant only to the extent they intersect topics of own-force and / or anyone else's military (or militarily relevant) capabilities or prospects.
I have heard that the entire 'Star Wars' anti-ICBM laser program was a deception, an unworkable system that the USA never intended to build - but the USSR was forced to attempt to replicate the (largely imaginary) technology. Certainly Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle, two science fiction writers in the 1980s, were convinced that their advice to Ronald Reagan had bankrupted the USSR and won the Cold War.1) It is often useful to give the impression of deeply studying obscure subjects in the hope that one's known competitors will believe that there is advantage to be gained there, and thus spend even more resources on them. For example, sometimes I wonder whether the whole psychic research race between the US and USSR just consisted of each side trying to convince the other to waste more resources on something pointless.
Such Congressional jockeying has demonstrably occurred with respect to facility locations and contracting opportunities (but not contracts per se) associated with DOD basic and applied research efforts.... 2) Practically speaking, a major function of the DoD is to provide pork-barrel spending opportunities and sinecures for various members of Congress and their constituents. It may be that someone contributed heavily to a campaign with the condition that their offspring be set up to head or work at a safe program near home. Or maybe someone just wanted a government contract to provide janitorial services for a new military program.
It's certainly true (if only via 20/20 hindsight) that the technological aspects of the arms race became a sort of arm-twisting campaign that influenced Soviet R&D decisions - forcing them to always play catch-up - and ultimately contributed to the Soviet Union's collapse.I have heard that the entire 'Star Wars' anti-ICBM laser program was a deception, an unworkable system that the USA never intended to build - but the USSR was forced to attempt to replicate the (largely imaginary) technology. Certainly Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle, two science fiction writers in the 1980s, were convinced that their advice to Ronald Reagan had bankrupted the USSR and won the Cold War. ...
There are multiple problems with this story (as stated in the interview) which make me think the reporting witness (pilot) was either lying or changing facts to avoid mentioning things he couldn't talk about (for security reasons).I bring this up because it is a new discovery and essentially all I know about an ostensibly, extraordinary case, which seems impossible not to have surfaced before?
Thoughts, comments.... anything which might help!
Well, there is a war on. This 'automated shuttle' presumably has surveillance equipment, so it would probably have its uses in the observation of Ukraine and elsewhere.The automated space shuttle X37-B has just returned to Earth, after 908 days in orbit. I wonder what it did up there. It seems a bit of overkill for a spy plane.