• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

UFOs: Dis-Information

Further thought... if a Top Secret US aircraft, why is it flying over Paris plainly observable and what exactly is it doing there...
 
Each can form their own opinion - but if you follow the Bob Lazar thinking - it's back engineered technology from crashed UFOs. The new movie should be interesting.

Add to that - the supposed American trade for Alien technology that is the reward for allowing so many Grey Alien abductions in the USA. The hybrid programme.

As for the Paris video - strangely it looks exactly like what a bloke (with no interest in UFOs), walking his dog, saw in NE Lincolnshire. Could be fake though - but a little utterance when it turned into a ball of light and disappeared sounded very genuine to me.

There is also the huge American black military budget, announced as 'missing' the day before 9/11.

If the specialist Forums say there is no advanced technology programme or secrets, I am sure they are right though :)
 
Nothing mysterious about concordski.

It ( the Tu 144 I think) was a direct copy of the Anglo-French Concorde.

But they couldn't get it right. and after at least one accident, they gave up on it.
 
Personally I wouldn't follow any line of thinking from Lazar on triangles or anything since based on many investigations into him by many good researchers the guy is not be trusted nor believed about his relationship to area 51.
 
Can anyone stateside comment on how common a surname Doty is over there? I have a tenuous connection to someone with that surname who says her father served in the USAF. Could it be..?

But before I jump in feet first, it would be useful to know how high the odds are. Also, while I gather it is important to have a very large pinch of salt on hand, is there any purported biographical/service record available for Richard C. Doty? I have a rough time period and geographical location for one posting of my contact's father, so it would seem prudent to cross-reference that (not to mention correlate ages between him and my contact) if possible before I blunder any further in. Even as little detail as just his home state or year of birth would be a useful starting point.

Krepostnoi (and anyone else who may be interested),

You can find Richard Doty's service record here-

http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com/2018/06/finally.html

Page 2 of the documents is the actual service history. I've had a quick scan through all the documentation and can't find anything particularly revelatory. The main question that springs to mind is what did Doty do to warrant an apparent demotion that saw him see out his days in the Air Force as a "Food Services Specialist"? Anyone have any idea?
 
Each can form their own opinion - but if you follow the Bob Lazar thinking...
Maybe worth keeping in mind his criminal record and that supposed reversed engineered craft resembles Billy Meir's copious photos of a, 'flying saucer', which has the most specious foundation in Kenneth Arnold's utterly misconstrued reported sighting of what was never saucer-shaped in the first place.

It's bollocks mate.
 
Nothing mysterious about concordski.

It ( the Tu 144 I think) was a direct copy of the Anglo-French Concorde.

But they couldn't get it right. and after at least one accident, they gave up on it.

I'm not sure that's strictly true. The pilots attempted to show off a manoeuvre that stressed the plane beyond its design limits. Far more likely is that it was dropped due to most countries not allowing supersonic flight over land - the wimps.
 
I understand that there was a lot of reliability problems with it.
 
Back
Top