EvilSprout:
I guess it's just a bloody hard mag to market at the end of the day, and it may just be they throw their hands up and go "well, it's a bit like Bizarre..."
I agree and while I have never thought that the ads reflect poorly on us or imply anything about the Forteans out there I must admit to being suprised when the dirty phone lines and bong ads cropped up - it was like they'd got a special deal on a job lot of ads from Bizarre.
I don't really mind that most of the ads don't interest me (although that one for the first serie of Babylon 5 certainly sparks my interest - I'll put my hands up now to being a nerd) but I am disappointed at the rather unoriginal thinking behind it - as you say:
It's like someone's gone "that's a magazine for weirdos" and that's it.
I may be wrongly characterising the readership but I would imagine that the FT readership probably bought more books and films than your average punter and that companies that attempted to engage us that way would reap the rewards.
Flicking through this issue we have:
Computer game - ~shrug~
Lego - this only makes me think modern lego is rubbish
DVDs (interesting selection of films but it could be a bit more targetted).
Become a writer - hmmmmmm
An ioniser
Computer game
Mobile phone ringtones and stuff - why?
Drug paraphenalia
Now I'd never really noticed the lack of ads in the longer articles - I'd rather they spread them around a bit more. Anyway back to the ads:
FT back issues
FT mugs
Then a another big gap.
Then the smaller ads:
Swords, drugs, name a star, goth jewellery and Dianetics.
Pheromones, herbal viagra, mind powers, drug seeds and the massager/vibrator.
Then a film ad on the back page - a sci fi.
------
Thats not actually too bad - some of the ads are a bit odd (the mobile phone ones, the "massager" and all the drugs stuff) and I wonder how they do business. The how to be a writer and the ioniser seem a little 'low rent' pos. just because of the poor quality of the ads themselves.
If that keeps the costs down then I have no objections to that mix really. I'd rather have a page of Amazon focusing on some recent films and books of Fortean interest but overall it isn't too bad.
I think the question of ads and things comes up in the FT survey but if it helped FT give more detailled information to their ad department I'd be happy to answer a much more indepth survey - either paper or online will do.
Emps