• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Sex Toys

Mighty_Emperor

Gone But Not Forgotten
(ACCOUNT RETIRED)
Joined
Aug 18, 2002
Messages
19,407
Wrong - so very, very wrong

I just had this link passed to me - it seems like the ideal festive present for the Christian in your life - I kid you not (and suggest that those of weak consitution avert their eyes now) but its:

The Baby Jesus Butt-Plug
Link is dead. Here's the text and image from the MIA webpage.

t-div-1351.jpg
Baby Jesus Butt-Plug
Glory to the newborn King! Perfect for altars, creches, baby showers and Secret Santa gifts, the Baby Jesus Butt-Plug is designed complete with swaddling clothes (although if you're going to share him, we suggest that you use a swaddling condom). 4-1/4" long, 1-3/8" in diameter at the widest insertable point. Manger not included. Glow-in-the-Dark White (a pearlescent white).
Salvaged from the Wayback Machine:
https://web.archive.org/web/2003100...owfish.com/catalog/toys/divine_butt_toys.html



Manger not included.

Thank God for that (although not directly I'd assume).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Aha, from the same people who brought us the Virgin Mary Dildo, I'd heard about that but never seen it before.

I think the 'Exorcist' crucifix is my favourite of that batch, if it wasn't so damn expensive I'd be tempted to get one to send to my ex-pastor.
 
BRF: I didn't actually dug beyond the first page so thanks for pointing that out - the problem is now which aged Aunt to horrify? ;)

[edit: The manufacturer's site is here:

http://www.divine-interventions.com

and they do even more including Moses ("he could get a rock wet, make a bush burn.....") and Judas!!]

Emps
 
BlackRiverFalls said:
I think the 'Exorcist' crucifix is my favourite of that batch, if it wasn't so damn expensive I'd be tempted to get one to send to my ex-pastor.

now I'm in a library so I can't acess the site but dosn't it have a large crusifix...erm...stress relever?

I must agree: it's the perfect present for your ex.:rofl:
 
Emperor said:
Good gravy :eek:

Some of those (Thor and Orca) should count as WMD - I assume they are still working on the Sperm Whale ones??

Emps

I beleve they're working it verry hard :D
 
hee, hee I love the disclaimer on each item

Please shop carefully. We do not accept satisfaction returns on this item.

I wonder why? :cross eye
 
Sex toy sparks airport scare
Operations at Mackay Airport in North Queensland have returned to normal after a discarded sex aid sparked a full scale emergency.

A passenger threw the personal item in a rubbish bin, prior to boarding a flight to Brisbane this morning.

Staff notified authorities when the device started to make a noise.

Police evacuated the Mackay terminal and were about to call in experts when the passenger came forward.

Acting Inspector Roger Lowe says it is important people do not leave behind suitcases, briefcases or any device that cannot be obviously identified which causes concerns.

He says the man was embarrassed at the chaos it caused.

Flights were delayed for about half-an-hour.

Last Update: Monday, October 4, 2004. 2:15pm (AEST)
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200410/s1212665.htm
 
I was sent this as a possible Xmas present suggestion*:

Beckham's Bejeweled Buzz

11-30-04



If you're David Beckham, the sexy soccer player, you can make sure your lovely wife Posh gets off in style, thanks to a 1.8 million dollar jewel-encrusted vibrator.

At Toys in Babeland we've always taken some issue with the "diamonds are a girl's best friend" saying, because we happen to know plenty of women who'd take their vibrators over their jewelry any day. Well, when you're rich and famous, you don't have to choose! If you're David Beckham, the sexy soccer player, you can make sure your lovely wife Posh has both in the form a 1.8 million dollar jewel-encrusted vibrator. No kidding! Beckham had the vibrator designed as a gift for Posh by a London strip-club owner. Apparently, it's revving up to be a hot gift this holiday season; word has it Mick Jagger's already got one on order. Of course you don't have to be a millionaire to give a great vibrator. Check out Toys in Babeland's selection, which has vibrators for folks on a budget, as well as those on a spree!

Source

* but I'm still betting my Dad would prefer some books.
 
Build Your Dream Sex Machine

By Regina Lynn

Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,67719,00.html

02:00 AM Jun. 03, 2005 PT

Last week I wrote about Violet Blue's demo of the Thrillhammer, a sex machine located in New York that she controlled from a laptop in San Francisco. What I didn't mention was the price of a Thrillhammer.

The Platinum model will set you back about $4,900; the Gold, $4,200. For custom machines, prices vary depending on what you order.

If you had thousands of dollars for a splurge, would you really spend it on an internet-controlled sex chair when you could buy a good motorcycle instead? Or maybe a home theater system?

Those items may not be as high on your wish list as they are on mine. Still -- and I could be wrong -- I suspect few of us would blow $4,900 or more on a multimedia-equipped recliner with a dildo attached. If nothing else, where would you put it? (The Thrillhammer, I mean. I know where to put the dildo.)

But that doesn't mean we have to let the potential of teledildonics pass us by.

The mastermind behind Slashdong, who calls himself qDot, wants everyone to be able to participate in remote sex if and when the opportunity presents itself. And he doesn't want you to have to spend thousands -- or even the hundred-plus it costs to get started with Sinulate Entertainment or High Joy Products -- to do it.

"The first idea was kind of a joke," qDot says. "I came up with it about five or six years ago, hooking up a sex toy to the Quake video game on the PC just out of silliness, thinking, 'Hey you can shoot people and (the vibrator) will go faster.' But then I started realizing that it's actually a cool idea."

QDot is a robotics engineer who works in a mainstream lab, which is one reason he keeps his online identity completely separate from his offline life. His fiance supports his extracurricular activities; his boss might not be as understanding.

His fascination with teledildonics -- sex toys that lovers can control for one another over the internet, whether they're in the same room, the same house, or 3,000 miles apart -- grew out of his interest in video games.

"It's about taking the environment of an old game, one you can't recode or add to, and making it more immersive using force-feedback signals," he says.

He points out that force feedback has been around since the 1980s for PC games, and since the mid-1990s for the PlayStation.

I can practically hear him shrugging over the phone. "All we're doing is taking the electricity that's supposed to go to the motors and routing it somewhere else," he says.

Easy enough for a robotics engineer like qDot or Blue, but what about the rest of us?

"The same basic concepts that any robotics or electronics buff work with apply to sex toys as well," qDot says. "The circuits used to control vibrators through the internet are the same ones used to make little robots and other home-hobbyist-type stuff. So the entry level is actually fairly low."

And that's the other reason qDot launched Slashdong, with its tutorials showing you how to create your own sexercycle (a stationary bike equipped with a dildo) and your own SeXbox (an Xbox for adults only). He wants more people to get into robotics, and to realize it's just not that difficult.

Slashdong is just one of five websites he maintains to teach people how to build robots and other electronic gadgets themselves. Deathbots is another.

"(Deathbots) is my 'clean' site," he explains. "But it doesn't get a lot of readership so I decided to use sex toys and teledildonics to educate people about engineering."

Cost is only one factor that might encourage someone to build their own teledildonics system. Privacy is another, especially in those parts of the world where you can't pick up a vibrator at the drugstore. (Sorry, Alabama.)

"A lot of people really freak out about sex stuff, giving out their name and credit card online," he says.

"If you do it by yourself with your own software or open source or whatever you want to call it, it becomes untraceable, because you aren't spending any money or signing up to a large service. And you can customize it to do whatever you want it to do."

You won't find any nudity at Slashdong, and in the future you might not even see flesh. QDot has learned that his "robosapien" and other bots can hold parts and sex toys for the photographs that illustrate each project tutorial.

For qDot, the site is about engineering and education, not about adult products or entertainment. "I'm more interested in the sexiness of engineering than I am the engineering of sex," he says.

However, he's quick to point out the advantages for singles -- you can potentially have sex with anyone on the internet -- and for non-singles. "It's part of trying to maintain monogamy through technology," he says.

"A person can take their sex toy, run to Radio Shack, buy some parts," he says. "Not only are they getting off, they've learned about electronics, motor control, robotics and whatever else. It's cool because you can use a lot of things for sex, but everything you learn up to that point can be re-implemented for other projects."

Before I talked to qDot I never would have thought to build my own teledildonics system. Now, if I ever have a spare moment, I might tackle one of the simpler projects.

In the meantime, I'll keep saving up for a new motorcycle -- sans dildo.

See you next Friday,

Regina Lynn

- - -

Regina Lynn and qDot both frequent the Sex Drive forum, which you can join if you visit www.reginalynn.com . Or send her e-mail at [email protected].

Source

Links:

www.thethrillhammer.com
www.slashdong.org
www.sinulate.com
www.highjoy.com
www.deathbots.com
 
Penises Just Can't Commit


By Regina Lynn

02:00 AM Dec. 16, 2005 PT

Editor's note: Some links in this story lead to adultmaterial and are not suitable for viewing at work. All links of this nature will be noted with "NSFW" after them.

I'm trying to relax in the bath with my only waterproof vibrator, Elemental Pleasures' Panthère (NSFW), but I can't stop thinking about Drew.

Rather, I've written about toys a lot lately, and he sent me an e-mail last week explaining that he seessextoys as a threat, not an enhancement, to a long-term relationship.

Men have confessed their discomfort with se xual accou terments to me before. They see them as competition, or as a criticism of their lovemaking technique. They look at the ridiculously huge dil dos and wonder whether they'll meas ure up.

"It seems to me that introducing an artificial aid into lovemaking ... can definitely provide a great increase in physical pleasure," Drew (not his real name) writes. "(But it) does so at the expense of emotional pleasure, for both partners."

He takes great care to explain his reasoning without sounding judgmental or defensive. His e-mail is thoughtful and well-written, and he ties his concern about sexualaids to the emotional connection between lovers.

"For a dedicated couple, lovemaking is a vital component of a lasting relationship, an act that reaffirms and strengthens the bond between the partners," he says. "Introducing a toy into this equation adds a layer of abstraction that can only be destructive of that bond, even if the damage is extremely subtle."

For me, it's always been the opposite. In my 20s, I was embarrassed to bring toys to bed with my partner, even though we'd been together since we were teenagers and our relationship lasted almost 13 years. I thought toys were so deeply personal that the very thought of sharing them paralyzed me. (This was before cybersexand my subsequent reversal of all previously held sexual prejudices. But that's another column.)

After our (amicable) split, I reserved my trinkets for solo use. I was single for the first time as an adult, and no way was I going to bring out a toy with a new playmate, lest he'd wonder whether I'd used it with someone else the weekend before.

Now, approaching 35, I'm finally comfortable bringing toys into lovemaking. And I've found that my comfort level is directly proportional to depth of intimacy I feel with my boyfriend. It's a sign of love and trust -- basically, the opposite of Drew's fears.

We don't reach for the gadgets every time, and not even most of the time, despite what you might think from reading my columns. But it's something we can laugh about and play with together, and isn't that part of intimacy, too?

I have one friend whose husband believes introducing even the tiniest, teeniest, quietest prop is tantamount to bringing another man into the room. They have a good and active sexlife -- but to unilaterally reject your wife's tentative suggestion of trying a toy together illustrates a profound difference in how most men and women relate tosex.

In this case, her commitment to a strong sexualbond includes trying out new things and playing together. But his commitment is to pleasuring her with just his own body, and he interprets her suggestion as a hint that he's not adequate on his own. (Believe me, if that were true, adding a toy is not going to help much.)

Her husband is not unique in his reaction, alas. "When I am giving my wife pleasure, it is me, my skill, my knowledge of her body and feelings," Drew writes. "With a toy it is a piece of plastic, and I might as well not be there. How can I express my commitment with a toy?"

Repeat after me: A peniscan't express commit ment any more than my Panthère can.

Don't get me wrong. I'm a big fan of penises. Nina Hartley (NSFW) even told me I was a "cockhound," so I have it on good authority that I'm no misanthrope.

But a woman understands a man's commitment through his fidelity, through togetherness, through touch and words and breath and sound. Priapus has little to do with it.

Commitment is sticking together through the tough times, joining forces even when it seems easier to go separate ways, keeping the r elationship a priority over individual temptations or desires. And commitment is giving one another pleasure (sometimes even when you don't feel like it) and keeping sexa priority so, as Drewsays, you continually reaffirm your connection.

Men do show their commitment through action, including lovemaking. And a man's openness to novelties shows his commitment to keeping the fires burning, to experimenting with the unexpected. It says he wants to be playful, to give and receive pleasure, to try new things together. It shows he respects his partner's interests.

It also proves he's working hard to let go of the idea that his penis or his "technique" is the most important part of a woman's lovemaking experience. (As Ann Regentin wrote recently at Clean Sheets, "what straight people call foreplay bears a remarkable resemblance to what lesbianscall sex.")

Drew concludes that sexual aids are "depersonali zing" and wonders "how deeply a person can be committed to his or herpartner when toys are involved in love."

Judging from the overwhelmingly positive response from men after last week's introduction of the Happy Kitty, I'd say very deeply.

And you know what? If your partner is asking about trying toys with you, she's doing so because she's into sex with you. How can you not like that?

I certainly would never expect anyone to do anything sexually that seriously discomfits them, although I think it's good for us to challenge our boundaries from time to time. Yet I think we do ourselves, and our partners, a disservice if we dismiss nookie tech wholesale.

Considering all of the sexualtemptations in our modern world, it only makes sense that we would harness the power of human inge nuity to enhance sexu al pleasure and keep lovemaking exciting over a lifelong commitment. And that can include gadgets and gizmos along with everything else.

See you next Friday,

Regina Lynn

- - -

Regina Lynn hopes to see you at AdultExpo/CES in January. Stay tuned to reginalynn.com or join the SexDrive forum for details.

Commit
 
British Bars Selling Sex Toys in Machines


Mar 6, 11:12 PM (ET)

LONDON (AP) - Bars and nightclubs in London and other British cities have begun using vending machines that sell sex toys such as mini vibrators.

The pink Tabooboo machines had previously been used in public toilets in Britain, under the assumption that such settings gave buyers some privacy.

But Geoff Todd, manager of the Alphabet Bar in London's West End area, said the Tabooboo machine it installed in the middle of the bar is used daily.

"Some people use it just because it's in the bar. Some make a special journey, maybe because they are to embarrassed to go into a sex shop," Todd was quoted as saying by Monday's The Guardian newspaper. "Some buy the toys because they are a novelty, some do it for a laugh, some buy them as presents. It's been a great success."

In addition to bars and nightclubs in London, Manchester and Newcastle, the vending machines also have begun to show up in hairdressing salons, health clubs and retail stores, Tabooboo managing director Alan Lucas said.

He said the company also has exported about 20 of the machines to Italy and about 10 to the United States.

"The younger generation isn't phased by sex toys. They don't believe they equal pornography. Vending machines allow them to buy such products anonymously without going to a seedy sex shops to do so," Lucas said.

The 11 different sex toys carried by the Tabooboo vending machines sell for an average 5 pounds (euro7.30, US$8.80) each, Lucas said.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060307/D8G6GGF84.html
 
At a very minor tangent, it appears that something akin to teledildonics has already arrived:

Internet Enabled Rabbit Vibrator

Online sex has taken a new leap forward with the recent invention of the Internet Enabled Rabbit Vibrator. Now you can link directly anywhere in the world and hook up with a play partner for instant online sex. This dual-action vibrator is made of a sensual, see-thru purple jelly. There are rotating pleasure beads in the shaft of the dildo and a vibrating, rabbit clit vibe at the base. Just by itself, this rabbit vibrator is a high-quality and sexually gratifying sex toy.

ve744_241_325.jpg


Televibe - Phone/Internet Controlled Sex Kit

Finally you can truly touch your loved one or your submissive from across the globe. All you need is either a telephone or a computer with internet access. Masters or Mistresses can stimulate their subs with the 7 inch long, 1.5 inch wide G-Spot jelly insertable that can be administered in the anus or in the vagina. Once the 2 are connected by either the phone or computer the administrator has control of the vibe. The touch tones from the other phone or computer will make your TELEVIBE respond with one of 9 distinct functions!

# The functions provide the following sensations: 1-Pulsing
# 2-Fast Pulsing
# 3-Super Pulse
# 4-Throbbing
# 5-Buzzing
# 6-Rhythmic
# 7-Waves
# 8-Techno
# 9-Multipulse

lc125b_245_325.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Footballers win sex toy damages

A German sex toy firm is to pay German football stars Michael Ballack and Oliver Kahn 50,000 euros each after it used their names to sell vibrators.
The stars sued the firm Beate Uhse because it sold special World Cup vibrators called "Michael B" and "Olli K" last year without their permission.

The damages - £34,000 ($67,000) for each player - were awarded in Hamburg.

Ballack is a Chelsea midfielder, while Kahn is the Bayern Munich goalkeeper.

The footballers had originally demanded 60,000 euros each in damages.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6653803.stm
 
Men challenge sex toy 'discrimination'
A chain of pharmacies has been sued for discriminating against men over a decision to sell sex toys for women.
By David Thomas
Last Updated: 8:47AM BST 12 Aug 2008

Apoteket, the state-run chain in Sweden, has been reported to JämO, the country's equal opportunities ombudsman, over its decision to stock only female sex aids.

The chain introduced the lines of vibrators and other items in June, but two claims have already been made against it.

One said that Apoteket was guilty of double standards, giving a "misguided and untrue view on sexuality where a woman with a dildo is seen as liberated, strong and independent, whereas a man with a blow up plastic vagina is viewed as disgusting and perverted."

But the company has defended its decision, saying it would stock sex toys for men if there were any good ones on the market.

Eva Fernvall, who oversees products for Apoteket said the company believed "there are no products of good quality for men on the market".

"Should there be such products specifically for men, then there is nothing stopping us from selling them," she added.

The ombudsman has rejected the claims, saying that "Apoteket's goods are made available to men and women, and therefore Apoteket does not break the law regarding sex discrimination". :?:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... ation.html
 
This has got to made up...

Woman Dies After Using Jackhammer As Dildo
Posted on May 5, 2009 by tubesteak

ARNDALE, OK – Sheriff’s investigators have closed the unsettling case of a 49-year-old female construction worker found dead in her driveway after a neighbor witnessed her using a high-powered jackhammer to pleasure herself.

After a two-day investigation in which officials initially suspected foul play–Shirley Dent’s death on May 1 has now been ruled an accident “after severe internal distress induced by the machine was discovered,” Det.-Sgt. Karl Sprout of the Alpara County Sheriff’s Office said yesterday.

On May 1, a neighbor witnessed a naked Ms. Dent in her driveway “struggling to direct a jackhammer toward her mid-section.” The alarmed neighbor notified police after hearing ear-splitting moans of distress that carried over the raucous jackhammer. Authorities arrived at the scene to an unresponsive Ms. Dent, who was then transported to West Grenier Hospital where she was pronounced dead shortly thereafter.

The recently divorced Ms. Dent had been questioned by authorities three times over the past month after neighbors complained of her running a prostitution ring from her home. Records also show that Ms. Dent supplemented her income as the sole proprietor of a sex toy distributor.

Ms. Dent’s alleged extracurricular activities appear to be unrelated to her death. A neighbor who declined to be identified said, “She was a horny lady, especially after her husband moved out. My family could hear moans coming from her place all the time.”
 
MrRING said:
This has got to made up...

Dunno. It has been known for folks to attach dildos to electric power saws and drills and perhaps she just decided to go one better in the "sex machine" stakes.

That said I just can't see how the mechanics of this work (even if by midsection they are... beating around the bush and really mean mimsy, or if that is to specialist a medical term, then lady parts):

On May 1, a neighbor witnessed a naked Ms. Dent in her driveway “struggling to direct a jackhammer toward her mid-section

It is like an apparent suicide when the detective realises the trigger is so far down the rifle that there arms aren't long enough tor each. Unless she used her feet. It still doesn't explain why she was outside. I can't imagine there is a good place to try this but if you were then perhaps the privacy of your own home would be best.

That said it sounds so bizarre you'd think no one would make it up. :shock:
 
There is a difference between a dildo and a vibrator

- or so I am told! :oops:
 
rynner2 said:
There is a difference between a dildo and a vibrator

- or so I am told! :oops:

I can't say for certain, but I think if you are strapping it on to a a power tool (ooer :shock: ) you probably don't need any more vibration. Of course, if you wanted any revolving, grinding, bending and flexing you might want to look at a fake willy with more oomph, but usually, I'd imagine, it is overkill (no bad taste puns intended). I'd recommend you experiment and see which suits your needs, and let us know how you get on (possibly start with a French tickler on an electric toothbrush and work your way... up :lol: ).
 
OH, I SEE how it IS..... so it's only MEN that die doing stupid stuff on a dare?!!!!.....
 
Not being sure what a jackhammer looked like, I google-imaged it, and found The Windy City Gay Naturists. :shock:

Not sure I want to learn a. how a jackhammer is relevant to gay naturists or b. how comfortable naturism would be for enthusiasts of any sexual persuasion in a windy city. :lol:

Anyway, Philo_T, who says she was doing it for a dare? Looks like common-or-garden, gender-neutral stupidity to me.
 
Mighty_Emperor said:
I can't say for certain, but I think if you are strapping it on to a a power tool (ooer :shock: )

I read a historic treatise about the building of the tunnel through the Eiger Nordwand and it is mentioned that there were worker's protests when they were provided with a new type of jack hammer. (This is around 1900 or so.)

These had to be pushed more by the hips than by the belly and the workmen complained that they suffered frequent spontaneous "semen emissions" and after a while were too weakened to continue working. One of the workmen complained about "his trousers being all wet".
 
uair01 said:
I read a historic treatise about the building of the tunnel through the Eiger Nordwand and it is mentioned that there were worker's protests when they were provided with a new type of jack hammer. (This is around 1900 or so.)

These had to be pushed more by the hips than by the belly and the workmen complained that they suffered frequent spontaneous "semen emissions" and after a while were too weakened to continue working. One of the workmen complained about "his trousers being all wet".

You need to to tell me:

a. the make and model of this jackhammer

and

b. where i can buy one.

Right now!!!! :lol:
 
Funny though it is, the story about the Eiger Nordwand jackhammer is helpful to understanding the story about the woman killed by one.

It was the vibrations produced by the object in question which had the capability to induce orgasms. No undressing or penetration required, as those unfortunate men found.

So Ms Dent didn't need to be doing anything more suggestive than leaning the appropriate part of herself against the jackhammer, as the Eiger Nordwand workers were required to do.

Of course, she may have found a way to... shall we say,
get to know the jackhammer really well, but the article doen't suggest that.
 
Back
Top