A
Anonymous
Guest
Adam Rang said:Typing in 'Bush goat 9/11' brings up some interesting links.
http://209.123.142.199/lawgiver/911.asp
http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/story/0,7369,612355,00.html
The top story is bizzare. It takes two dictionary definitions for "somber" and then tries to tell us:
Now it appears that the somber reaction of President Bush is perhaps more revealing than at first glimpse. If the President "briefly turned somber" and "spoke briefly and somberly about the terrorist attacks," then the reporters were describing both his demeanor and speech as being shadowy, obscure, dark, unreal, without light, and suspicious. Was this a mistaken word of description, or were they accurately reporting what they saw and observed?
Anyone else confused? That has to be the stupidest conclusion I have ever seen made. Ever.