Greenrd, didn't you read your copy of FT? The whole reptoid thing seems to be catching on in a big way. Grays are out, lizards are in.
Icke seems to be nuts, gullible and uncritical, but is he really?
Sure, he "simply regurgitates it all in his books" (which, incidentally, I have no intention of reading,) but he also invites the audience to pick what they want to believe, doesn't he? The reason why he is so popular is surely because lots of people like what they hear.
The only things I've paid attention to regarding David Icke are three or four radio interviews with him in the Jeff Rense archives. He seems to be mostly interested in things like personal freedom and has a very clear ideal about what he believes the world should be like.
I really do think the conspiracy stuff, whether he actually believes any of it or not, is intended to support that, a means to an end.
----------------------------------------------------
Regarding the 'Protocols...' thing, Annasdottir didn't tell you there is a short feature about it on page 37 of the current FT.
In that other David Icke thread 'Mat' said the 'Protocols...' was used as an opportunity to discredit a lot of supposedly truthful information, to -as he put it- "tar such ideas with the brush of anti-Semitism, racism. (And subsequently, presumably, 'hoax', 'fake', etc..-JA.) This is a very effective psychological control device to warn people off certain conspiracy theories."
He didn't mention lizards though.
If Icke "says that they are are an accurate description of how the Lizards plan to take over the world and that they were deliberately rewritten by the Lizards to foment anti-semitism!"
Does he include the bits that were apparently lifted from those two fictional sources?
http://www.forteantimes.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1175&perpage=15&pagenumber=3
-J
----------------------------------------------------
Mat's original post:
"As far as I know Icke has the same position on the Protocols that he had from the Robots' Rebellion onwards, the same I have: that in itself it is a forgery, there is not a big Jewish conspiracy to take over the world; but that there is nevertheless such a conspiracy, just not a Jewish one. The Protocols mirrors in its suggestions and predictions an awful lot that has happened in the world since it was written; is this supposed to be just coincidence? Maybe whoever wrote it (or whoever wrote what it was cribbed from) knew a lot about a real (non-Jewish) conspiracy, planned from behind the scenes? This is Icke's position, and this is not anti-Semitism. Rather, the Protocols are useful to those who want to disinform people into disbelieving that there is any conspiracy going on, because they can tar such ideas with the brush of anti-Semitism, racism. This is a very effective psychological control device to warn people off certain conspiracy theories... even when those theories are avowedly non-racist, quite the opposite in fact! People are so scared of being thought of as racist or Nazi.
Here is the page where I have my copy of the Protocols:
http://matmcveagh.b0x.com/tbp/conspiracy/forces/religion/index.htm It also has many other articles, including in-depth analyses, and a news report about how the forger has likely been identified."
*Update:
That website ain't working, there appears to be cached versions here:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=mat+mcveagh+protocols