• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Huge Hydrogen Stores Found Below Earth's Crust

punychicken

Gone But Not Forgotten
(ACCOUNT RETIRED)
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
374
vast amounts of hydrogen in the earths crust!

Monday, April 15, 2002

LONDON -- Scientists have discovered vast quantities of hydrogen gas, widely regarded as the most promising alternative to today's dwindling stocks of fossil fuels, lying beneath the Earth's crust.

The discovery has stunned energy experts, who believe that it could provide virtually limitless supplies of clean fuel for cars, homes and industry.

Governments across the world are urgently seeking ways of switching from conventional energy sources such as coal, gas and nuclear power to cleaner, safer alternatives.

Energy specialists estimate that oil production will start to decline within the next 10 to 15 years, as the economically viable reserves start to run out.

Hydrogen gas has been hailed as the ultimate clean fuel, as it produces only water when burned. Until now, however, moves to switch to a "hydrogen economy" have been dogged by the cost of making the gas. The two most common ways -- extraction from natural gas and sea water -- are expensive and create environmental problems.

Now scientists at the American space agency Nasa have found that the Earth's crust is a vast natural reservoir of hydrogen which has become trapped in ancient rocks.

The team made its discovery while trying to explain how bacteria live many miles below the Earth's surface. Such bugs have no access to sunlight, forcing them to rely on another source of energy for life. Scientists suspected that hydrogen was the source.

According to Professor Friedemann Freund and colleagues at Nasa's Ames Research Center in California, the gas is produced when water molecules trapped inside molten rock break down to release hydrogen.

"In the top 20 kilometres of the Earth's crust, the conditions are right to produce a nearly inexhaustible supply of hydrogen," said Professor Freund.

Studies by the team of common rock types such as granite and olivine have revealed extraordinarily high levels of trapped hydrogen. Professor Freund said that his team had "tantalizing evidence" that as much as 1,000 litres of hydrogen may be trapped in each cubic metre of rock.

Although formidable engineering problems remain to be overcome in abstracting the gas, the sheer volume of the Earth's crust means that such a high concentration would solve the world's energy problems.

"Everyone thinks of gas and oil as the main sources, and it's very difficult to get anyone to take alternatives seriously," said Dr. David Elliott, the professor of technology policy at the Open University in London. "The possibility of vast reserves of hydrogen in the Earth's crust could change that mindset."

The low yield of energy from burning hydrogen compared to gas, however, means that vast quantities of rock would have to be mined.

Professor Freund believes that the extraction and crushing of rock to extract the trapped hydrogen is likely to be prohibitively expensive. The reaction which creates the gas takes place at depths far below those involved in oil extraction, which are typically about two miles down.

The most promising source of the hydrogen may be geological "traps" similar to those now drilled for natural gas. Professor Freund said: "One of these natural hydrogen fields is already known to exist in North America, and extends from Canada to Kansas."
 
Why is this better than the frozen methane thing?

And how do you stuff 1000 litres of gas into 1 cubic meter of rock? Doesn't 1000 litres fill that exact amount itself?
 
The rocks are porous and soak it up like a sponge, but 1000 litres per cubic meter does seem a lot. Hydrogen is also a "pure" gas, whilst gasses such as methane produce various harmful byproducts after combustion.

I think Malthus would be extremely interested :)
 
And how do you stuff 1000 litres of gas into 1 cubic meter of rock? Doesn't 1000 litres fill that exact amount itself?

Not necessarily - it depends on the temperature and pressure (think presureized aresol cans).

I must admit when I first started reading the article I was worried that maybe smoking a ciggie while digging the garden wasn't such a good idea. I was quite relived to realise the hydrogen is a couple of miles down! ;)

Jane.

(apologies for the spelling btw. I seem to be having a bad day).
 
The low yield of energy from burning hydrogen compared to gas....
I thought nasa's best rocket fuel was hydrogen and oxygen, how is it that it is less energy efficient than methane etc ?
I hope that the fuel tanks for cars would be rupture proof.... the chemists at uni xmas parties used to fill toy balloons with h2 on a string and light the string. I swear that was the start of my deafness!!!
 
Interesting article though I fear it's a non-starter. In Arabia you only need to stick a straw in the ground to get oil, whereas crushing huge tons of rock would be a economically unviable. That is, unless you find a large trapped deposit you can tap like a natural gas field, which is unlikely as H2 can pass through most things over time so probably wouldn't accumulate anywhere. The thing about hydrogen is also that it is very difficult to handle, apart from the explosive properties (which is also true of natural gas) it is such a small molecule it can seep through metal over long periods of time making storage a nightmare.

The article makes a number of mistakes and sweeping statements, Brian is quite right as H2's calorific value is much higher than CH4 so I don't know how they rationalised that remark.
*Ping*
Oh yeah, they mean yield, as in a shitload of rock will need to be shifted to generate the same amount of CH4 which just pops out of the ground with comparitively little effort.
Oil is most certainly not going to run out in 10-15 years (this belongs in the UL forum). And the 1000 litres of H2 in 1m3 almost certainly refers to 1000 litres at standard conditions, i.e. atmospheric instead of the high pressure 2 miles down.

The major benefit of H2 is the production of only water vapour upon combustion, as opposed to CO2 and H2 for methane and other hydrocarbons. However I seem to recall water vapour is a greenhouse gas too.....
 
Has anyone else noticed the huge reserves of hydrogen sitting just outside our borders? You know, the big blue wobbly bit?
Why the hell do you need to dig for it???
When I was at school I was working on an idea for a hydrogen powered car just for something to do. The fact that even a minor RTA would level a street always caused problems.
How about a condenser? Of course, you'd end up having to empty out a bloody great water tank every so often, which might be a bit of a pain.
 
Back
Top