• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

If you can't trust the CIA, who CAN you trust?

ogopogo3

Gone But Not Forgotten
(ACCOUNT RETIRED)
Joined
Oct 25, 2001
Messages
1,371
http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/internet/03/20/cia.web.privacy.ap/index.html

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The CIA got caught with a hand in the Internet cookie jar.

The agency removed software from one of its Web sites this week after a private group discovered that the CIA was using banned Internet tracking technology called "cookies," said Mike Stepp, who manages the CIA's public Web site.

"It was a mistake on our part. It was not intentional," Stepp said Tuesday. "The public does not need to be concerned that the CIA is tracking them. We're a bit busy to be doing that."

Cookies are small software files often placed on computers without a person's knowledge. The files can make Internet browsing more convenient by letting sites distinguish user preferences, but they have been criticized for violating privacy because they can track Web surfing.

The government issued strict rules for how federal agencies may use cookies in 2000 after it was discovered that the White House drug policy office had used the technology to track computer users viewing its online anti-drug advertising. The rules ban the use of "persistent" cookies, which track Web habits over years.

Daniel Brandt discovered on Thursday that a CIA site had placed one of those long-lasting cookies on his computer. Brandt is president of Public Information Research, a private San Antonio-based group that preserves publications related to intelligence and business.

Brandt said he discovered the cookie, which keeps working until 2010, when he was looking at the Web site for the CIA's Electronic Reading Room, which provides access to previously released agency documents.

"They're not supposed to be doing this," Brandt said. He said he was particularly concerned because the reading room site allows users seeking documents to search for particular words.

Redesign blamed, log files destroyed
"The keywords you put in reveal an incredible amount about what you're looking for and what your interests are," Brandt said. "It would be very, very tempting to track that kind of information."

A notice on the CIA Web site states, "The Central Intelligence Agency Web site does NOT use the 'cookies' that some Web sites use to gather and store information about your visits to their sites."

Brandt sent e-mail to the CIA with his concerns and the agency responded on Monday, removing the cookie software and some other temporary cookies that were discovered.

Stepp said an outside company had redesigned the reading room Web site, which was posted to the Internet on January 29.

"Unbeknownst to us, it was loaded with some software, commercial off-the-shelf software used for Web analysis," Stepp said. The software included a cookie that tracked repeat visitors to the site.

To make sure no improper information about site visitors had been recorded, Stepp said two sets of log files would be destroyed.

Congress issued a study last summer that found 300 cookies still on the Web sites of 23 agencies despite the government ban.
 
OK so the CIA has a new honest and open policy. So what agency is going to do the dirty work now?
 
You ain't from around here, are you? Why, the NSA, of course.
 
Always thought the NSA done the dirty work in any case. The CIA just cocked it up for them:)
 
Does anyone know if the NSA has the same ban on domestic espionage operations as the CIA (or so they claim).
And who needs cookies when you have
Echelon
Still the CIA World Factbook is one of the best reference works on the web
 
It's neither the CIA or NSA who are doing the dirty work these days. It's actually
 
Niles Calder said:
It's neither the CIA or NSA who are doing the dirty work these days. It's actually
Sorry about that I got cut off.

As I was saying it's actually an organisation calling itself, funded by unvouchered "black buget" money and operating out of a hidden facility in, disguised as the Corporate HQ. I know this because.

What's really terrifying is not only that these people are completely unaccountable, they're working on an international theatre using technology right at the current cutting edge. They have a system called that make Echelon look like your mother holding your mail up to the light. Not only can they intercept emails and the like in real time they can also censor them and send them on their merry way.

There's nothing that these bastards couldn't achieve. They satsify every paranoids Illuminati or NWO and the point is that only a handful of people on the outside know of their existance and none of us can prove a thing!

Niles "Full Grasp of the Truth" Calder
 
Niles, do you mean the royal and ancient order of bufalloes ? I have heard they are up to some very fine charitable works but don't quote me on that.
 
intaglio said:
Niles, do you mean the royal and ancient order of bufalloes ? I have heard they are up to some very fine charitable works but don't quote me on that.
Okay
 
Blimey, it's the Norman Collier thread.

A....... ah.... ....fah... ....a.... ....me.... ....uh... ...eh.... ......ollocks!
 
Niles Calder said:
Not only can they intercept emails and the like in real time they can also censor them and send them on their merry way.Niles "Full Grasp of the Truth" Calder
And there was me blaming Lineone...
 
Back
Top