Ah yes, easier to see in that frame there, in fact. Would you agree that the 'second version of the figure' as shown in that freeze-frame, is sort of sideways-on, and possibly sort of half-bent (almost in a skiing pose, for want of a better description)? That's what I'm immediately seeing, anyway.
It's difficult because even in the 'first version' of the figure, one can see what
appears to be a face (possibly even with three dots for eyes and mouth (or eyes and nose)... but... it's so hard not to just think "must be simulacra", you know?
I really wish they'd done a comparison video so we could rule out... things...