I hear ya! The only kind of Facebook I endorse involves anthropodermic bibliopegy...World UFO Day is July 2, 2021.
Social media such as Facebook ( I am not a Facebooker ), etc.is trying to generate interest to walk with signs near the White House on that day to demand UFO information to be released.
Given there are 15,000 National Guard around this area, I do not think this is a good idea.
...or will the public get an insight into this phenomenon?
Elizondo failed entirely to respond to Mick West's questions. West put forward the demonstrably sensible explanations for these phenomena, and all Elizondo could respond with is 'our analysis was different'.Metabunk's Mick West interviews Elizondo and offers up his mundane explanations for the Navy UFO videos!:
I'd have to agree that I don't think Elizondo answered all of Mick's questions to satisfaction and didn't seem to understand the mechanics of the tracking system. In think what is going on is what I have mentioned before; This whole exercise is just a way to introduce the subject again to the public --because they are being forced to do it by the recent actions of the phenomenon. They wouldn't even be talking about it at all if some of the pilots hadn't gone on the Internet to discuss their experiences after the Nimitz incident, and others were being traumatized from their experiences, and could also spill the beans on the Net. They are trying to get ahead of the situation I think, without giving anything away. The whole thing is a calculated operation. Elizondo gets these ambiguous portions of footage released and then he and Justice and others have to be very circumspect about what they say, but the footage is controvertible and doesn't conclusively prove anything. Member of Congress were shown video and information that would damage national security if widely seen, and surely there is a lot more footage and sensor evidence that is more shocking than what Congress saw too. So, Elizondo is being disingenuous --that's a fact, because he knows much more than he is willing to discuss -- Steve Justice, too. Elizondo didn't seem familiar with Mick's work because he doesn't care about it. Elizondo was a manager --not a scientist in these endeavors, and that became apparent to me during the interview. I think there is indeed other data and footage concerning these incidents we aren't allowed to see (that's a fact), and I am sure there is a lot more. I was amazed when Elizondo was asked about what the names of the videos meant, and he said he didn't know!Elizondo failed entirely to respond to Mick West's questions. West put forward the demonstrably sensible explanations for these phenomena, and all Elizondo could respond with is 'our analysis was different'.
That implies either that Elizondo, or his 'analysts', have information that we do not have access to, and that he is not willing to share with us;
or that Elizondo is too stupid to realise that his analysis is mistaken. Both are probably true.
One thing is certain; Elizondo is not dedicated to sharing the whole truth with the public, so his entire campaign to 'make the facts clear' is a sham.
They are certainly real and I am sure there is a LOT more data and evidence we are not seeing. I think Elizondo and the government is being as circumspect and as careful as possible to NOT to produce anything that would prove anything, only controvertible snippets. You can see Elizondo's concern with secrecy and wording in the interview. Just look at his resume.I went back and read again the interview between Fox’s interviewer Maria Bartiromo and former intelligence head,
John Ratcliffe, and he states that we are not taking about one pilot’s sighting or one satellite warning.
Ratcliffe says we are taking about a multitude of top secret defense systems being set off by a UFO.
For me this is GAME OVER !
UFOs are real.
Should have got Jeremy Paxman to interview him, he wouldnt let him get away with not answering a questionI'd have to agree that I don't think Elizondo answered all of Mick's questions to satisfaction and didn't seem to understand the mechanics of the tracking system. In think what is going on is what I have mentioned before; This whole exercise is just a way to introduce the subject again to the public --because they are being forced to do it by the recent actions of the phenomenon. They wouldn't even be talking about it at all if some of the pilots hadn't gone on the Internet to discuss their experiences after the Nimitz incident, and others were being traumatized from their experiences, and could also spill the beans on the Net. They are trying to get ahead of the situation I think, without giving anything away. The whole thing is a calculated operation. Elizondo gets these ambiguous portions of footage released and then he and Justice and others have to be very circumspect about what they say, but the footage is controvertible and doesn't conclusively prove anything. Member of Congress were shown video and information that would damage national security if widely seen, and surely there is a lot more footage and sensor evidence that is more shocking than what Congress saw too. So, Elizondo is being disingenuous --that's a fact, because he knows much more than he is willing to discuss -- Steve Justice, too. Elizondo didn't seem familiar with Mick's work because he doesn't care about it. Elizondo was a manager --not a scientist in these endeavors, and that became apparent to me during the interview. I think there is indeed other data and footage concerning these incidents we aren't allowed to see (that's a fact), and I am sure there is a lot more. I was amazed when Elizondo was asked about what the names of the videos meant, and he said he didn't know!
Luis Elizondo is a former employee of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (OUSDI) and a former U.S. Army Counterintelligence Special Agent. He is now the Director of Global Security and Special Programs at To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science.[1]
Elizondo just kept on talking didn't he? Mick began to look as though he was sucking on a lemon..Should have got Jeremy Paxman to interview him, he wouldnt let him get away with not answering a question
I will always remember the Paxman interview with Michael Howard where he asked tje same question 12 timesElizondo just kept on talking didn't he? Mick began to look as though he was sucking on a lemon..
I'll take a look!I will always remember the Paxman interview with Michael Howard where he asked tje same question 12 times
I know others who believe the alien deal theory, and they had me read this some time ago:feinman,
My opinion is that the deal Eisenhower and Churchill made with aliens years ago is over, and E.T. Is forcing our hand.
It started with the Nimitz tic-tac UFOs and has escalated to where governments of the world have to say some about all
this UFO activity
Now you have the former National Intelligence person, John Ratcliffe, saying these UFOs are tripping top secret
warning systems all over the world.
All of a sudden it is a different ballgame !
UFOs just got devilish !
John Ratcliffe’s opinion carries a lot of respect.
Maybe they are our guardians, that is why there have been no recorded physical attacks from alians on earth, they are mearly watching over us to make sure we or something else does destroy the world.I know others who believe the alien deal theory, and they had me read this some time ago:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1949483185/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Personally I think that is anthropomorphizing the phenomenon. It doesn't have anything to worry about from us. I'm pretty sure our hypersonic missiles would just shut down if we tried to use them on some of the devices --or not even start, having been obviated far in advance of our knowledge of it. Notice how the devices do what they will over our airspace etc. with impunity.
Some folks in the government see them as a demonic manifestation apparently. Yet another reason why direct contact with we crazy apes is not an option at this time.