• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

2012 movies

sherbetbizarre

Special Branch
Joined
Sep 4, 2004
Messages
5,247
As you probably know, the world is going to end on December 21, 2012.

Well according to the Mayan calender anyway. See the thread...

http://www.forteantimes.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3966

I expect a few movies on this subject will appear in the coming years, starting with a biggie...

Sony has snapped up "2012," a spec script for a 2009 summer tentpole release that Roland Emmerich will direct.

Sony has essentially committed to greenlight the film, signaling that studios are open to flashy packages after the resolution of the writers strike. Production will begin in late summer or early fall.

Deal came on the same day that Emmerich pitched his vision and his budget projections for the film, which he scripted with "10,000 B.C." co-writer Harald Kloser. Execs at various studios, who read the script Tuesday

Several studios bid on the project, while some shied away from a pricetag that could hit $200 million.

The title refers to the date on which the world is supposed to end, and it frames an ensemble disaster epic akin to "The Day After Tomorrow," the blockbuster that Emmerich sold in a similar spec sale and which turned into a global hit for 20th Century Fox.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117981245.html?categoryid=13&cs=1
 
Can't they just scratch out the 00 on the crop of millennial disaster flicks and pencil in 12 ?
 
I think that's what they did.
 
From THIS article -

Authors disagree about what humankind should expect on Dec. 21, 2012, when the Maya's "Long Count" calendar marks the end of a 5,126-year era.

Journalist Lawrence Joseph forecasts widespread catastrophe in Apocalypse 2012: A Scientific Investigation Into Civilization's End. Spiritual healer Andrew Smith predicts a restoration of a "true balance between Divine Feminine and Masculine" in The Revolution of 2012: Vol. 1, The Preparation. In 2012, Daniel Pinchbeck anticipates a "change in the nature of consciousness," assisted by indigenous insights and psychedelic drug use.

...something tells me Roland Emmerich will be going with the "widespread catastrophe" theory :)
 
First out of the blocks is cheapo 2012: DOOMSDAY

In this epic disaster, four strangers on a journey of faith are drawn to an ancient temple in the heart of Mexico on December 21, 2012. For the Mayans it is the last recorded day. For NASA scientists it is a cataclysmic polar shift. For the rest of us, it is Doomsday.

2012_large.jpg


http://www.theasylum.cc/product.php?id=140

Includes a Trailer - lots of concerned looks, a "race to save humanity", plus someone screams "What's happening?", which is fair enough.
 
I'm gonna stick my neck out and say the world isn't going to end on Dec 21, 2012. If I'm proven wrong feel free to bring this post back up to shame me.
 
In Hollywood-land it's far too easy to blow up the world these days.

If only it was just as easy to find decent scripts writers, as you can be certain that the script for this one will stink like a bucket of very rotten fish.
 
Makes it look like a Michael Bay film (except for the distinct lack of dogs humping legs, other dogs and Michael Bay himself ............. etc). :)
 
Relax, the end isn't nigh
Nasa condemns fear-mongering website used to market new film
By Steve Connor, Science Editor
Saturday, 17 October 2009

For the past 30 years, business leaders, former government officials and scientists have been secretly working on a plan to save humanity from destruction when the Earth collides with another planet on 21 December 2012.

They have set up a covert Institute for Human Continuity which has now agreed to go public and warn the world that there is a 94 per cent probability of "cataclysmic forces" destroying our planet in three years' time.

Its website offers survival kits and encourages people to sign up for a lottery to decide who will be among the lucky few chosen to be saved. :shock:

You are probably thinking that this is an elaborate hoax – you would be right. But hundreds of people have apparently been taken in by the nonsense put out by Sony Pictures as part of a "viral marketing" campaign for its film 2012, set for release next month.

Nasa is taking the issue so seriously that an astronomer at the agency has spoken out to condemn the use of the hoax website, which claims the world is going to end in 2012.

David Morrison said he had received more than 1,000 enquiries from members of the public who were concerned that Nasa scientists were involved in a conspiracy to deny that they were tracking the movements of Nibiru, a hitherto undiscovered planet on a collision course with Earth.


Dr Morrison, a distinguished scientist at Nasa's Astrobiology Institute, said that the marketing behind the film, distributed by Columbia Pictures, was making some people so scared that he feared they could harm themselves.

"They've created a completely fake scientific website. It looks very slick. It talks about this organisation having existed for 30 years and it consists of international scientists and business people and government officials having concluded that there is a 94 per cent chance of the Earth being destroyed in 2012 – and it's all made up, it's pure fiction. But obviously some people are treating it seriously," Dr Morrison told The Independent.

"I've even had cases of teenagers writing to me saying they are contemplating suicide because they don't want to see the world end. I think when you lie on the internet and scare children in order to make a buck, that is ethically wrong," he said.

There is nothing on the website instituteforhumancontinuity.org to indicate it is a hoax. It states that scientists are tracking a "planet X" on the fringes of the Solar System and mixes real scientific phenomena with complete fiction, such as a simulation of planet X's near-Earth trajectory.

The website urges people to sign up to a lottery guaranteeing every person of the planet an equal chance of survival in 2012 with the offer of a place in one of the Institute for Human Continuity's "safe havens". Only a small Sony Pictures copyright notice at the bottom of the screen and a link to the film's own website give any hint that this is a purely fictional website.

Dr Morrison said the idea of a mystery planet called Nibiru dates back 30 years to fictional books about supposed predictions of ancient Summerian astrologers. It was taken up by others linking a 2012 planetary collision with the end of the Mayan calender. Interest in the idea has resurfaced in the lead-up to the film's release, Dr Morrison said. "It is too bad, but there is no law against lying on the internet or anywhere else except in a court of law."

Vikki Luya, Sony's publicity director, said: "It is very clear that this site is connected to a fictional movie. This can readily be seen in the logos on the site, including the Sony Pictures Digital copyright line and the reference to the '2012 Movie Experience'. It is also evident in the user-generated videos, as well as the numerous online references to this marketing campaign."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien ... 04340.html
 
Saw 2012 earlier... Yes it's rubbish, but quite entertaining when Cusack and Co are running away from the always-just-an-inch-behind-them outrageous cgi...

Best way to see this is on Boxing Day TV with family, food and drink so you can zone out during the painful talky bits.

Danny Glover appears as the too-old-for-this-shit President.
 
I was dragged to this over the holiday weekend as my husband and stepdaughter think the big screen is the only way to watch disaster porn. It was slightly worse than I expected. Not one woman in the cast has a useful skill, the closest any of them come to an heroic action is when poor Doomed Bimbo rescues her little yappy dog, and my husband and I were both offended (possibly unnecessarily as no one here as mentioned it) on behalf of the Brits we know online when the Queen appeared in the rescue ships. We agree that there's no way she'd be there; she'd have stiffened her upper lip, sent the princes to safety, and gone down with the palace. She may be a figurehead, but she's a figurehead who knows her job and can be trusted to do it!

The other things I object to are pretty much de rigeur for the genre and not worth mentioning except in the post-movie summing up of stupidities in the car.
 
PeniG said:
....I were both offended (possibly unnecessarily as no one here as mentioned it) on behalf of the Brits we know online when the Queen appeared in the rescue ships. We agree that there's no way she'd be there; she'd have stiffened her upper lip, sent the princes to safety, and gone down with the palace. She may be a figurehead, but she's a figurehead who knows her job and can be trusted to do it!....

Actually I thought that too...

I quite liked the film though, basically it was all about blowing up the planet a spectacular manner, and it did that very well 2012, the rest was just your usual disaster movie plot to get you from one set piece to another.

As Sherbert says it's total tosh, but entertaining tosh, if you don't go with expectation of deep insights into the human condition.

Nice to see old Hapgood getting a name check.

The flight out at the being as LA disappeared down a chasm reminded me a lot of John Martin's painting "The Great Day of His Wrath" if you see the actual painting there's even a train disappearing down into the abyss (it's too small to see on reproductions)...now there a man who was born about 200 years too early, he'd have been superb film-maker in the block-buster mode..
 
Back
Top