• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

4chan Causing Psychological Damage?

uair01

Antediluvian
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
5,449
Location
The Netherlands
I couldn't find a thread to post this in ...


On this Twitter thread there's an interesting discussion of how (if at all) 4chan damaged a whole generation.
(Weird, but I'm reading books on anorexia right now (it has become a whole new literary genre!) and they describe a similar process of slow (self-) indoctrination and psychological change that starts innocently but can ruin a life. There I see a similar "normalization of shitty behavior".)

I kind of wish there was a support group for mid-20s adults who had their brains melted and their personalities permanently damaged by being a kid on 4chan in 2009. My therapist doesn't know what the fuck "check out these dubs" means and I don't feel like explaining it to her.

I know this reads like a joke but bro if you were on 4chan as a fully grown adult between 2006-2012 you have collective trauma let alone a minor. It's taken years to undo the normalization of shitty behavior and content that I was programmed as a wee lad into thinking was ok.

As a kid you don't understand that apathy is a bad thing. You think the stoicism of your peers is maturity and you never realize that the only *break* from that apathy they ever have is when they destroy just to feel lucid. You sacrifice everything you love in earnest to it.

That nihilism that suddenly breaks into violence whenever something strikes a sour note isn't a product of the internet but it is a product of online centralized communities. Even you can even see this by the gradation of kindness 4chan has from its specific to general boards.

The more centralized things are the more people feel compelled to engage in general trends, the less they feel the desire to generate their own or a sense of value to their actions. The more specific the board, the less this was the case. /b/ as the totally general board? Worst.
(Worried Rice is gonna disagree with me about a lot of shit I say in this thread lol)

/v/ was a mild improvement over that but *everyone* online plays videogames, it was still a tremendous centralized hub of anonymized users. 4chan was a wholesale rejection of the WANT of value.

It was extremely liberating if you already felt like you were creating nothing of value to go into a place to talk where nobody *wanted* to have more value than you. An anonymous user telling you to "eat shit and choke" was no more or less intimidating than one praising you.

My point was that psychologically, this culture was *extremely* unique to the time. Your 50-something therapist with a jitterbug isn't going to understand why you're so scared of people knowing your first and last name, or your address, or ever giving out your phone number.

They aren't going to get that compartmentalizing your online identities impulsively is a learned defense mechanism from watching other people's lives be ruined by the internet, they won't get why you fear being visible or vulnerable or having sincere public displays of emotion.

They won't get why you're terrified of associating the loved ones you have with your online identity because god forbid you should fuck up but were lucky enough that nobody can't find *your* information they'll know that your close friends and family might not be so lucky.

The 4chan childhood experience is the same kind of trauma the children of doomsday preppers have- because your anonymity isn't just one choice, it's a routine. You must always hold onto it for dear life every step of the way or it can shatter in an instant and it never goes back.
 
4chan doesn't psychologically damage people; the lack of an authentic social life and meaningful relationships beyond the virtual world of the Internet does.

I'm very fond of my Internet friends (who are almost completely distinct from my real-life friends and family), but if I abandoned the latter for the former, I'd likely be in trouble; if I'd only ever had the former, I'd likely be in big trouble. If it's a place like 4chan, your friends may be fun for verbal sparring and cheap laughs, but none of them is going to even know about your funeral, let alone attend. 4chan doesn't break people, it entraps people who lack the repair-kit that most of us build up through childhood and adolescence. As ever, we're probably mistaking symptom for cause.

Personally, if there were a hierarchy of online risks, I'd put those obsessed by the parasocial relationships of Twitch further up the ladder of endangerment than those who spend time as apprentice edge-lords whose ersatz interactions rely on the endless recycling of stale memes, and who mistakenly learnt that 'nigger' is a punchline and that swatting a sport: most people grow out of all this, but online obsession can put you on the road to heartbreak, financial ruin and suicide.

As to developing a desensitisation to porn, gore and bigotry, 4chan hardly holds as monopoly.

Welcome to the Internet -- humanity's dark underbelly!
 
Not just 4chan but certain facebook groups, subreddits and other forums. The internet affords us the ability to find like-minded people (hurray) that we might otherwise not encounter many of in our lives. The problem comes when these groups start developing toxic behaviours and strong in-groupism (not sure how to put it) as part of their group cultures. Also the primacy of those interests to a person's life becomes amplified by the existence of strong communities focused around them. These problems of course exist in interest groups outside the internet but may be exacerbated by the ease of finding others with similar niche interests on the internet.

As one of millions of examples, there's a subreddit for people who don't want to have children. That's a perfectly reasonable desire in my opinion – I don't want children either. But the group culture has devolved into something completely obnoxious and toxic, with posters regularly referring to parents as 'breeders' and children as 'crotch-goblins'. The same thing happens with some internet communities of atheists – again, I don't believe in God, but I would never wish to be associated with those communities.
 
I like 4chan. I like unrestricted freedom of speech. I think it is healthy and good. 4chan is a bit like the human id, it is true, but I would rather see that there is an open public forum for these thoughts so they don't become repressed and fester into something more dangerous. Say what you like about 4chan, but it did actually galvanize a lot of positive activities too. 4chan became a recruiting ground for hacktivists like Anonymous at a time of steep conservatism when the left was dead in the water. I personally don't think that people should be forbidden to speak about things like nihilism, suicide and race hatred. The danger only occurs when there is no contrary opinion being aired. And yes, children are dirty little crotch goblins.
 
I like 4chan. I like unrestricted freedom of speech. I think it is healthy and good. 4chan is a bit like the human id, it is true, but I would rather see that there is an open public forum for these thoughts so they don't become repressed and fester into something more dangerous. Say what you like about 4chan, but it did actually galvanize a lot of positive activities too. 4chan became a recruiting ground for hacktivists like Anonymous at a time of steep conservatism when the left was dead in the water. I personally don't think that people should be forbidden to speak about things like nihilism, suicide and race hatred. The danger only occurs when there is no contrary opinion being aired. And yes, children are dirty little crotch goblins.

So, how long have you been in therapy?
 
Oh, I like it too.

Full of daft and thoughtful stuff but never taking it quite fully seriously.

My Youth had Punch for that. But at least Punch was respectable.

As for objectionable stuff online, well, theres a lot, but most of us are mature enough not to take it to heart.

(One of the most unhappy I saw was an english language site which was actualy a hotbed of rants against foreigners and their degenerate pidgin, and talk of purifying english of this yuk...starting with norman-french...)

Privacy is a whole nother matter.
 
So, how long have you been in therapy?
The subtext of this comment is that you want to shame me for having a mental illness, and indeed I do have one; PTSD, as a result of my time in the Middle East where I saw a number of atrocities being committed. I was going to receive EMDR therapy for, but then covid-19 came along. What you just did constitutes online bullying. I suggest you apologise and withdraw this comment.
 
Not just 4chan but certain facebook groups, subreddits and other forums. The internet affords us the ability to find like-minded people (hurray) that we might otherwise not encounter many of in our lives. The problem comes when these groups start developing toxic behaviours and strong in-groupism (not sure how to put it) as part of their group cultures.

I'd put it this way ... The overt problem may emerge when these groups (as wholes, or their individual members en masse) develop a uniformity / conformity in behaviors among themselves and / or when interacting with others. This uniformity / conformity can be as benign as providing bases for mutual recognition and individual self-identification, or it can be as toxic as forcing regimentation and motivating animosity toward "others."

These basic elements have always been part of the human social experience. The central change induced by having such social experience in the virtual online realm results from two factors intrinsic to online interaction. The first is the reduction or loss of interpersonal cues and consequences that serve to dampen excesses or mitigate extremes in the physical (face-to-face) realm. The second is the potential for disengagement of one's online persona from anything in one's actual person or personality. The former allows people to go too far, and the latter allows people to believe nothing they do or say necessarily matters (to themselves). In combination these factors allow one to evade the sort of personal authenticity and personal responsibility one must otherwise painfully / laboriously develop and maintain in the "real world" interactional space.


Also the primacy of those interests to a person's life becomes amplified by the existence of strong communities focused around them. These problems of course exist in interest groups outside the internet but may be exacerbated by the ease of finding others with similar niche interests on the internet. ...

The amplification is also enhanced by constraining oneself to interactions with self-selected others with similar orientations / opinions. The group becomes a pressure cooker for reinforcing and compressing the focal belief(s) around which the group has coalesced to the exclusion of any / all alternatives. It's like having ready-made off-the-shelf cults available on a casual drive-thru basis.
 
4chan doesn't psychologically damage people; the lack of an authentic social life and meaningful relationships beyond the virtual world of the Internet does.

Not singling out 4chan, but internet forums and especially Social Media (where people are more likely to post with their real name and photo rather than with the nom de plume and avatar more commonly found on forums) can damage people...by amplifying feelings of alienation, being different, not fitting in, and by channeling undeserving anger onto people posting in good faith.
 
Not just 4chan but certain facebook groups, subreddits and other forums. The internet affords us the ability to find like-minded people (hurray) that we might otherwise not encounter many of in our lives. The problem comes when these groups start developing toxic behaviours and strong in-groupism (not sure how to put it) as part of their group cultures. Also the primacy of those interests to a person's life becomes amplified by the existence of strong communities focused around them. These problems of course exist in interest groups outside the internet but may be exacerbated by the ease of finding others with similar niche interests on the internet.

As one of millions of examples, there's a subreddit for people who don't want to have children. That's a perfectly reasonable desire in my opinion – I don't want children either. But the group culture has devolved into something completely obnoxious and toxic, with posters regularly referring to parents as 'breeders' and children as 'crotch-goblins'. The same thing happens with some internet communities of atheists – again, I don't believe in God, but I would never wish to be associated with those communities.

There's a Reddit sub I regularly browse, though never post on where I've observed similar behaviours. All gangs/cults/groups etc tend render their out groups as monolithic blocks and are at least dismissive where they are not derogatory. The many issues with online interaction highlighted here by various posters just accelerate and exacerbate it.
 
The subtext of this comment is that you want to shame me for having a mental illness, and indeed I do have one; PTSD, as a result of my time in the Middle East where I saw a number of atrocities being committed. I was going to receive EMDR therapy for, but then covid-19 came along. What you just did constitutes online bullying. I suggest you apologise and withdraw this comment.

Hey, man, there is NO shame in having a mental illness. Plenty of us here have it.
 
Hey, man, there is NO shame in having a mental illness. Plenty of us here have it.
NP, actually I find that often the people with the biggest prejudice against mental illness are those who suffer from it. Weirdly, my diagnosis was actually quite recent. Last December in fact. I had no idea I was suffering from PTSD. Trust me when I say that 4chan had nothing to do with it.
 
As long as you know you need a bit of help, then that's good enough for me.
 
As long as you know you need a bit of help, then that's good enough for me.
Having PTSD doesn't in any way invalidate my opinion. Or are we back to square one and I need an apology?
 
Having PTSD doesn't in any way invalidate my opinion. Or are we back to square one and I need an apology?
What is going on here? Do you fancy him or something? GNCs original remark was perfectly innocent and clearly intended to be humorous and it just fell flat. It definitely wasn't bullying or anything else of that nature. Lets all just chill. :group:
 
There's a Reddit sub I regularly browse, though never post on where I've observed similar behaviours. All gangs/cults/groups etc tend render their out groups as monolithic blocks and are at least dismissive where they are not derogatory. The many issues with online interaction highlighted here by various posters just accelerate and exacerbate it.
b3ta is cliquey like that. I gave up on it years ago.
 
Back
Top