ENTIANONMULTI said:
As for the US only fighting in areas where Al Qaida is, this is a chicken and egg situation, also Al Qaida isn't an organisation with membership cards membership secretaries, so proof of who the enemy really are is difficult.
So, Al Qaida is a 'shadowy' terrorist organization whose existence must be accepted as a matter of faith,right? No member ship cards etc. How do you know they exist at all? Because the CIA told you so? Hell,Al Qaida has replaced the USSR as our 'new' permanent enemy. It's what keeps the CIA funding flowing in this post cold war world. That's a hell of an ulterior motive.
You say Al Qaida is only active in areas where the USA military is active because they are there to fight us. I say 'they' only appear to be active in JUST those areas because 'Al Qaida/terrorist' are convenient labels that are applied to anyone and everyone who resistances American domination.
Do you honestly expect us to believe that the people of Afghanistan & Iraq didn't take exception to having their countries invaded? That none of them fought/are fighting against us just for that reason? and that everyone who is fighting us over there is a member of Al Qaida/terrorists? Come on.
The big question is,what is Al Qaida? Well,I don't think it's any one thing it's several. So,here's my list:
1. AQ is a list (the data base) of Islamic militants who answer to the CIA & other Western intelligence services (MI5/6,Mossad) These are the guys who brought down The Soviet Union.
2. A mythical,non existent, world wide,highly sophisticated terrorist network completely independent of the CIA. America's Military Industrial complexes'
new boogie man. The one that justifies maintaining a huge military & it's cost & the needed threat to keep the people paying for it without protest. AQ is a much much better enemy than the USSR because it isn't tied to any one country and can be claimed to be active anywhere they want a war for what ever reason (or even at home to justify the loss of civil liberties). An all purpose enemy that can never be defeated because it doesn't exist.
3. A convenient label applied to anyone who resists American domination.Thus anyone who fights us is either AQ or a terrorist. This is why they only 'appear' where the US military is.
4. A convenient label applied to 'patsys' ('terror' cells in the West). The CIA (and others) send operatives into Mosques etc. until they gain the trust of the denomination. By this time, they have identified the young,disgruntled young men they seek. They approach them,"want to joint AQ"? if they accept, they are given a mission,money,explosives,arms etc. (whatever is needed for the mission). During this time they are protected from legitimate law enforcement (if the police,FBI etc are tipped off they are called off from above..see 911 for examples). If the PTB decide the attack should take place, they see to it that it does. If they decide against it,they can bust them & call it a 'sting' operation. Since they control any investigation there's no chance of being caught. It's creating their reality. Considering the payoff,why wouldn't they?
If you've got something to counter this or ANY evidence that what I've proposed isn't true,I'd love to hear it.