• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Cost of STDs

ruffready

Justified & Ancient
Joined
Aug 6, 2002
Messages
2,366
when (some who think their above it all)you play you

WILL pay!! why don't some folks "get it"? with a lilltle "thinking" they can avoid "being a part of this story"!!:nooo: Explosion of sex infections overwhelms health service
By Jeremy Laurance Health Editor
10 March 2003


Soaring rates of sexually transmitted infections are overwhelming the NHS and threatening the health of a generation of young people, according to a committee of MPs.

An inquiry into the NHS sexual health service by the Commons Health Select Committee has concluded that it is in crisis, with a shortage of resources, facilities and staff. Waiting lists are growing and delays in treatment are putting partners of infected people at increased risk, it found.

The committee, which is to meet this week to finalise its report, is expected to highlight the Government's failure to implement its sexual health strategy, published in summer 2001. The strategy was given £47.5m in funding, less than half the cost of introducing screening for chlamydia, a disease that causes infertility in women.

David Hinchliffe, the Labour MP for Wakefield and committee chairman, said: "Frankly, the whole sexual health service is a shambles. Professionals are crying out for help and not getting it. I do not use the word crisis lightly, but I think we have a crisis here."

Pressure on the sexual health services has intensified in the last decade, fuelled by changing sexual behaviour. Cases of gonorrhoea have risen 86 per cent in five years, and those of chlamydia have doubled. Syphilis is making a return and the rate of HIV infection rose to its highest level last year.

The impact of the rise in diseases has been seen in a doubling of the number of people attending clinics in the last decade to more than one million a year. Traditionally, patients receive immediate treatment to minimise the risk of passing their passing infections on to new sexual partners, but the "open access" service has collapsed in parts of the UK.

The average waiting time for an appointment nationwide is now two weeks. In that time a disease can be passed on. Genito-urinary medicine is the only medical speciality in which patients are encouraged to turn up without a referral from their GP because quick access is known to be crucial in controlling the spread of disease.

Specialists say the service has a 90 per cent shortfall of consultants and that the £47.5m set aside by the Government is inadequate. A plan to introduce national screening for chlamydia in women under 25 would cost twice that sum.

One specialist said: "The 10 per cent prevalence rate for chlamydia is absolutely horrendous. Some of us feel on that basis the Government should be rolling out a national screening programme. But the Health Department has not allocated the money, so it is running 10 more pilot schemes."

One of the biggest threats is the growing incidence of HIV, with 70 per cent of heterosexual cases contracted abroad. Modern drug treatments mean patients are surviving longer at an annual cost of about £15,000. Taking account of the risk of passing on the infection, the saving to the country of avoiding a single case of HIV is put at between £500,000 and £1m.

Mr Hinchliffe said yesterday: "Despite the Government having set out a sexual health strategy, the picture we gained is one of a service facing very serious difficulties."
9 March 2003 23:46
 
"edited" thread "title" to something "more clear" :)
 
Is this all our society cares about any more how much things cost I heard a report about domestic violence costin 20million and psycopaths running up huge bills. So it doesn't matter how many people die of diseases or women are battered or people raped and murdered. If it doesn't cost money does it not matter is it not immoral. Britain put an end to child prostitution not because it would save money but because it was right but now its all how much it costs. this is true decadence, Our MPs have huge pay increases this war on terror will cost billions in the end i'm surprised its going on at all then. I don't mind paying taxes to help the sick if I see progress but I see it going to new motor ways and improving London not the lost and lonely but our ahem glorious capital and I'm sure from what I've heard there are similar problems in the states also.
 
Well I care about how other people's frankly quite irresponsible behaviour is costing the health service money that could be spent elsewhere. If young people think they are mature enough to have sex, they also should be mature enough to have safer sex. If people want casual sex, then fine, but make sure you reduce the risks by being sensible !
 
If people want casual sex, then fine, but make sure you reduce the risks by being sensible !

Unfortunately younsters don't equate being sensible with having fun, their attitude is live for the moment and damn the consequences, I'm not sure you can ever change that attitude.
 
[/B]
Unfortunately younsters don't equate being sensible with having fun, their attitude is live for the moment and damn the consequences, I'm not sure you can ever change that attitude. [/B][/QUOTE]
Tell me about it - I spend every single day of my working life surrounded by 1,850 young people aged between 16-19. The noise alone is unbelievable.
 
But I am not just talking about sex I'm talking about murderers, rapists drug dealers and batterers these things actually hurt people I just think it is more important that we lok at the moral case for STD's and unwanted pregnancies that is something we all care about, but money rich and powerful people avoid paying high taxes by having foreign accounts more often than not the very poor don't pay taxes and hard working folk don't get to say as much as the powerful but if we make a moral stand more people have to take notice.
 
Demon Avenger said:
But I am not just talking about sex I'm talking about murderers, rapists drug dealers and batterers these things actually hurt people I just think it is more important that we lok at the moral case for STD's and unwanted pregnancies that is something we all care about, but money rich and powerful people avoid paying high taxes by having foreign accounts more often than not the very poor don't pay taxes and hard working folk don't get to say as much as the powerful but if we make a moral stand more people have to take notice.

Please! There is nothing worse than trying to legislate morals. If you really want to be moral (read good, otherwise you need to define "moral" in your post) then go do volunteer work in a VD clinic or give lectures on bettering ones self in local prisons. But DO NOT go around making laws against the things that you find repugnant. No one forces you to take drugs, or have irresponsible sex. You also have the opportunity to raise your own children in a manner you see fit, teaching them the ethics you choose. However, the most vile, obtrusive annoying laws (to me) are the Mrs. Grundy laws. People never say, "I'm doing this bad thing and can't seem to stop meself, make a law agin it." No. They say "my neighbor does this thing and it offends me. Make a law agin it".

Drug addicts are sick. Help them, punishing them does not work. People with STDs need antibiotics, not lectures. And so on....

Morality starts at home, folks, not in the offices of lawyers.
 
Is anyone else having real difficulty reading this thread?

As for STDs; People want sex. People are stupid. These will always be true.
It's just a matter of looking out for one's self.
 
No, I couldn't make sense of it either, but I didn't like to say !
 
Re: Standard Trunk Dialling

Dear 'Old Codgers,'
I remember, back in the Sixties, when Standard Trunk Dialling meant you could phone anywhere in the British Isles, just by adding the correct area code to the local number, without having to phone the operator. Wonderful!

It's sad and confusing to me, that it seems to be causing so many terrible problems now.

Yours Sincerely,

Ada Ramsbottom (Mrs)
 
Anyway, aren't we calling them STI's these days?? Something to do with "Disease" being seen as pejorative or something.

Bit like KFC, people didn't like the "fried" connatations lol:D
 
They are diseases. Nasty, dirty, filthy diseases, contracted by people who have no concept of their own wellbeing.
 
Hey I'm not defining morals and I did use to work with people who had caught STD's or got or gotten someone preganant and if you don't think it's morally wrong to batter someone then don't pay for and move to another country and don't.

People make mistakes and people do evil and telling people it's expensive wont make it go away. I'd rather have my morals than trying to squeeze a feeble argument out of capitalistic ideas of money and wealth against the worlds ills.
 
Maybe the species "human" is reaching certain limits as far as how we can medically deal with what is basically animal behavior.

If humans existed in nature, the various STD's would have killed off people possibly faster than the current rate, where people live for years with said disease, so you might have been able to pass it on to just a few people before it caught up with you rather than thirty or fourty.

And primitive humans wouldn't have antibiotics and other sytheticly pure drugs to fight off the diseases, and when some dolt doesn't take the full regimine of antibiotics and a few STD cells exist to live another day with a new immunity to said drug, the antibiotics lose effectiveness until what we have won't work with the new infections and they run roughshod over people around the world.

It's like a human "potatoe famine" - our world population is huge, the boundaries between us are small, and STD's are the Red Death holding sway over our modern party. 28 Days Later may not be that far off (or so my paranoia tells me....:D )
 
Back
Top