A
Anonymous
Guest
doesn't it seem that there have been too many earthquakes in politically sensitive areas recently to be accounted for by chance?
Taipei, several in Afghanistan, and New York state.
There's no direct evidence for an earthquake machine, but some very interesting circumstantial evidence.
Is it not a good whack outside of chance, for not just Taiwan, but actually the capital of Taiwan to have an earthquake, and in the same 4 to 6 weeks, politically central Afghanistan to have several, and then New York state.
It's a pretty big jump, admittedly. But if you find that it's very difficult for these to occur by chance, intelligent intervention is the only other possibility.
Why China? greatest means, motive, and opportunity.
Just what would happen if one converted gigawatts of energy to low frequency sound aimed at faultlines, i wonder?
Taipei, several in Afghanistan, and New York state.
There's no direct evidence for an earthquake machine, but some very interesting circumstantial evidence.
Is it not a good whack outside of chance, for not just Taiwan, but actually the capital of Taiwan to have an earthquake, and in the same 4 to 6 weeks, politically central Afghanistan to have several, and then New York state.
It's a pretty big jump, admittedly. But if you find that it's very difficult for these to occur by chance, intelligent intervention is the only other possibility.
Why China? greatest means, motive, and opportunity.
Just what would happen if one converted gigawatts of energy to low frequency sound aimed at faultlines, i wonder?