• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Europa

A

Anonymous

Guest
The Gallileo probe, currently in orbit around Jupiter, is to be destroyed by plunging it into the giant planet's atmosphere. The reason, according to Guy Webster from NASA:-

NASA, Mr Webster explained, did not want the ailing craft accidentally colliding with Europa, a Jovian moon thought to be covered in a salt-water ocean under a global ice cap.

"Galileo may be carrying Earthly microbes that could contaminate the environment with life. We don't want to seed Europa with anything organic."

The full story can be read here: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/11/03/1036308205556.html

Does this strike anyone else as rather a strange thing to say? Granted, if there's the possibility of life on Europa we wouldn't want it to be contaminated with microbes from Earth. But Europan life, if it exists, is supposed to be in the oceans under the ice and NASA have never expressed any concern about contaminating the Martian surface with Earth microbes carried by any Mars probes.

So are NASA trying to tell us something? Do they already know that there is life on Europa? A conspiracy theory in the making or just my furtive imagination doing overtime? I wonder what Hoagland would have to say?
 
I think you may be reaching a little ;)

IMO the reasoning behind it is they don't want to contaminate a potentially fecund moon with earthly organisms, because in 50 years time (or so) when we send more advanced probes up to take hard samples, they would inveriably pick up signs of life that would not be indigenous.

I think they're merely trying to preserve the Heisenberg principle in what is a relatively new space programme - after 50 years we don't want to start messing about do we? :)
 
schnor said:
I think you may be reaching a little ;)

IMO the reasoning behind it is they don't want to contaminate a potentially fecund moon with earthly organisms, because in 50 years time (or so) when we send more advanced probes up to take hard samples, they would inveriably pick up signs of life that would not be indigenous.

I think they're merely trying to preserve the Heisenberg principle in what is a relatively new space programme - after 50 years we don't want to start messing about do we? :)

You're almost certainly right, but you can see how some conspiracy theorists could interpret this this! ;)
 
Exactly, you're damned if you say anything at all, and you're damned if you keep quiet.

Ho hum, lets just hope my anti-tin-foil-hat particle beam will be developed at Area 51 like "they" predicted :blah:
 
I remember reading somewhere the possibility of massive balloon like creatures living in Jupiters atmosphere collecting free hydrogen and giving birth in lightning storms :eek!!!!:
 
Simplest explanation:

Mars: they decided back in the 50s-60s that it was devoid of life. Once the evidence started coming in that it might once have harboured life during its past, it was too late to worry about contamination.

Europa: they don't know one way or the other, so rather than take a chance on contaminating the moon before they get more evidence...

Or does anyone have other ideas...?
 
schnor said:
Ho hum, lets just hope my anti-tin-foil-hat particle beam will be developed at Area 51 like "they" predicted :blah:

So what you got against tin foil?
 
Nothing, it's tin-foil-hats that I don't like
 
Zygon, it was the original premise that wasn't quite correct. If you follow the link in my previous post you'll find that they did sterilise the landers that were sent to Mars. Assuming that the policy were to be carried forward into a manned Mars mission, it makes you wonder what kind of ordeals that the astronauts will have to go through. ;)
 
Man, you don't even want to know what's in store for you! :wince:
 
From last week's New Scientist:


Life could be tough on acid Europa

09:45 15 February 04

Far from being a haven of ice and water and an ideal spot for the search for alien life, Jupiter's moon Europa may be a corrosive hotbed of acid and peroxide. That is the conclusion of researchers who met last week to prepare for NASA's proposed Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter, an ambitious mission to study Jupiter's moons.

Almost all the information we have about Europa comes from the spacecraft Galileo, which completed its mission to study Jupiter and its moons close up before NASA dramatically crashed it into Jupiter in 2003.

Although the general perception of Europa is of a frozen crust of water ice harbouring a salty subterranean ocean kilometres below, researchers studying the most recent measurements say light reflected from the moon's icy surface bears the spectral fingerprints of hydrogen peroxide and strong acids, perhaps close to pH 0, if liquid.

But they are not sure whether this is just a thin surface dusting or whether the chemicals come from the ocean below. The hydrogen peroxide certainly seems to be confined to the surface, as it is formed when charged particles trapped in Jupiter's magnetosphere strike water molecules on Europa.

But parts of the surface are rich in water ice containing what looks like an acidic compound. Robert Carlson of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, thinks this is sulphuric acid.

He says that up to 80 per cent of the surface ice in some spots may be concentrated sulphuric acid, and suggests this may be a veneer formed by surface bombardment with sulphur atoms originally thrown out from volcanoes on Io, another of Jupiter's moons.

Other scientists think the results suggest that the acid derives from Europa's internal ocean. Tom McCord of the Planetary Science Institute in Winthrop, Washington state, points out that the greatest concentrations of acid seem to be in areas where the disrupted surface suggests that ocean liquid has gushed upward and frozen.

McCord thinks that the acid on the surface began as salts from the ocean underneath largely magnesium and sodium sulphates. Intense surface radiation caused chemical reactions, he says, which left an icy crust containing a high concentration of sulphuric acid as well as other sulphur compounds.

Jeff Kargel of the US Geological Survey in Flagstaff, Arizona, believes the sulphuric acid is coming directly from the ocean. He thinks that Europa's heart is rocky, with undersea volcanoes releasing sulphur-containing compounds and oxygen that react with the ocean water to form sulphuric acid.

"Europa has an Io hiding underneath the ocean," he says. If the surface sulphates have come from the water deep below, Europa's ocean might be an "acidic sulphate brine".

That could be bad news for life, as strong acids tend to destroy organic compounds. But it does not rule out the possibility - some terrestrial species of bacteria thrive in environments with a pH as low as zero.

Another blow to researchers hoping to probe this ocean for life comes from hints that Europa is much hillier than previously thought. Paul Schenk of the Lunar and Planetary Institute reports that a dark spot on Europa's surface is a 350-metre depression situated near a 900-metre rise - a total relief of 1250 metres. To support such a large relief, he calculates that the ice layer must be 10 to 30 kilometres thick, which is a daunting distance for any probe to drill through.

However, researchers are unlikely to find out much more from Galileo's data. Its measurements cover only a small fraction of Europa's surface, and much of the detail is obscured by background "noise" and low resolution.

"I don't think we're going to have a definite answer until we get back with better spectrometers, better resolution, and maybe a lander," McCord told New Scientist. Figuring out how to do that is part of his job as a member of the science team for the Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter, due to launch in 2012.

"If the surface is made of sulphuric acid, landing should not be a problem as long as the ice stays frozen," he says. But if it becomes liquid, the acid could be strong enough to eat through most materials used to make spacecraft. That may give pause to proposals for a probe that melts through the surface to study the ocean below.

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994664
 
Well, they don't know the concentration of any acid or salts dissolved in the water of Europa yet- it seems likely that much of it will come from Io, in which case it is probably only a surface deposit,

although the tidal warming that seems to heat Europa may also produce volcanos/black smokers to pump sulphur into the water.

I think it might make certain kinds of chemotrophic life more lifely rather than less, unless this acid sea is excessively corrosive.

Mars too will have had a lot of sulphur compounds in its water, especially toward the end of the Noachian when the seas were drying up. The seas could have been bitter and below freezing toward the end.
 
Ah! Just read this:
It will also visit Titan, which has perhaps the most astonishing extraterrestrial landscape in our solar system. To explore this giant moon, the spacecraft will send out two seemingly antique contraptions: a hot-air balloon to fly over the deserts and mountains, and a boat that will float on a sea of liquid hydrocarbons.

It fulfils so many SF dreams except I wish I was on that hot-air balloon.

Extraterrestrial rafting: Hunting off-world sea life
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2 ... tml?page=1
09 November 2009 by Stephen Battersby
Magazine issue 2733.

Sniffing out life on Titan (Image: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona/SPL)

3 more images

IF LIFE is to be found beyond our home planet, then our closest encounters with it may come in the dark abyss of some extraterrestrial sea. For Earth is certainly not the only ocean-girdled world in our solar system. As many as five moons of Jupiter and Saturn are now thought to hide seas beneath their icy crusts.

To find out more about these worlds and their hidden oceans, two ambitious voyages are now taking shape. About a decade from now, if all goes to plan, the first mission will send a pair of probes to explore Jupiter's satellites. They will concentrate on giant Ganymede and pale Europa, gauging the depths of the oceans that almost certainly lie within them.

A few years later, an even more audacious mission will head towards Saturn to sniff the polar sea spray of its snow-white moon Enceladus. It will also visit Titan, which has perhaps the most astonishing extraterrestrial landscape in our solar system. To explore this giant moon, the spacecraft will send out two seemingly antique contraptions: a hot-air balloon to fly over the deserts and mountains, and a boat that will float on a sea of liquid hydrocarbons.

This plan for ocean exploration was announced in February, when the science chiefs of NASA and the European Space Agency decided to press ahead with the planning stages of both missions. Jupiter is the destination that tops the schedule, probably because the Europa Jupiter System Mission relies on well-tested space technology. The plan is for EJSM to lift off in early 2020, in two pieces. NASA's contribution, the Jupiter Europa Orbiter (JEO), and ESA's Jupiter Ganymede Orbiter (JGO) will be launched within a month of each other and plot parallel courses for Jupiter, arriving after six years. They will then engage in a complex dance, visiting various moons before each probe homes in on its prime target.

JEO has the tougher task. It will have to spend a long time in the inner reaches of Jupiter's radiation belts, where it will come under intense bombardment by high-energy electrons that would quickly disable an ordinary spacecraft. Though JEO will be built using electronics hardened against radiation, it will have to be clad in aluminium armour to survive in this hostile region.

When it finally goes into orbit around Europa, JEO's instruments will explore not just the moon's surface, but its depths too. The first hints that this moon's crust hides a liquid water ocean came from Voyagers 1 and 2, which saw a flat landscape criss-crossed with cracks when they flew by in 1979. This was confirmed in the 1990s by NASA's Galileo spacecraft. Galileo also found that Europa distorts Jupiter's magnetic field, which could be accounted for by an electrically conducting layer below the moon's ice. Most planetary scientists see this as compelling evidence for a subsurface sea of salt water.

JEO will map the magnetic field of Europa in even finer detail, and also measure the shape of its gravitational field. Putting the two together will give us further insights into the moon's structure - especially the thickness of its ice crust and the depth of its ocean.

The orbiter will also be armed with ice-penetrating radar. If the crust is only a few kilometres thick, the radar might even be able to peer right through to the ocean beneath. In any case, JEO should reveal much new detail about the inner workings of the crust itself, says Bob Pappalardo, one of the NASA team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California, which is developing the mission. "We want to get at the plumbing of Europa."

Could anything be living down there in the Stygian waters? If so, it is not going to be getting its nourishment from sunlight in the way that most life on Earth ultimately does. Instead, astrobiologists suggest it could feed off hydrogen sulphide or methane spewed out by thermal vents on the sea floor, as some creatures do in our oceans. To digest this chemical soup, Europan life forms would also need a supply of oxidising chemicals. It is hard to see where these could come from, other than from the moon's surface, where the intense radiation around Jupiter splits water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen. While most of the hydrogen escapes, the oxygen can latch onto molecules on the surface. But can it get to where ocean-dwelling life can make use of it?

That's where the plumbing comes in. If the crust is thin, there may be places where the ice melts, so water could gurgle along cracks between the ocean and the surface. If it is many kilometres thick, as most geologists suspect, the plumbing may be more sluggish. This process could still carry a breath of oxygen into the depths as warmer blobs of ice rise and old crust cycles down to replace it.

There is even a chance that JEO could find direct evidence of life. Jupiter's gravity might crack open Europa's crust, creating vents that blow out plumes from the ocean beneath. JEO could sample them and analyse the molecules they contain using its on-board mass spectrometer. "If we find hydrocarbons, that will be exciting," says Brad Dalton, a planetary scientist at JPL. "If we find peptide chains or even proteins, that is going to have serious repercussions."

Complex molecules like these would be big news, but there is no reason to think that life on Europa should have Earth-like biochemistry, so Dalton and his colleagues must cast their net wide. "The trick is to design a system that can acquire the broadest and most detailed information possible, so it will be sensitive not only to what you expect, but to the things you are not expecting," he says.

There is no reason to think that life on Europa should have Earth-like biochemistry
The second spacecraft of the pair, Europe's JGO, could confirm the existence of a much larger ocean when it goes into orbit around Ganymede, the biggest moon in the solar system. If there is liquid water under the crust it would be the largest ocean outside of Earth: at more than 80 million square kilometres, it would be about the size of the Atlantic.

Deep and dead
As a habitat for extraterrestrial life, Ganymede is a far less promising prospect than Europa, however. Its magnetic field, measured by the Galileo probe, indicates that there is probably a layer of water about 150 kilometres down, isolated by an ancient, static crust of ice above and a thicker ice layer below. It is hard to imagine how a Ganymedian life form would find anything to eat.

JGO will also swoop past Callisto, the outermost of Jupiter's large moons. According to theoretical models, even cold Callisto is likely to carry an ocean deep under its ancient crater-pocked carapace of ice - although, as on Ganymede, the chances of anything living there appears slim.

Having both spacecraft in the system at once will allow for some unique observations, says Pappalardo. Comparing the outer moons with Europa should give extra insights into how moons form around gas-giant planets. Such planets are common around other stars, and many are in much closer, warmer orbits than Jupiter and Saturn. Some will have moons with surface seas, offering promising sites for life.

Even in our solar system, not all seas are locked away under an icy layer. The second expedition to explore alien oceans aims to send a craft to visit Saturn's moons, notably Titan. Here in the outer solar system it's far too cold for surface seas to be composed of water. Instead, Titan is believed to have seas of liquid hydrocarbons, mainly methane and ethane, which would form gases on Earth. The Titan Saturn System Mission, planned by NASA and ESA for blast-off in the mid-2020s, will not only sample an alien sea, but will even go boating on it.

While looping round Saturn, TSSM will also visit tiny Enceladus (pictured). This moon, which is believed to have a rocky core wrapped in a thick ice coat, stunned planetary scientists when they found a giant plume of water and ice blasting out from its south pole. "This icy moon is spitting its guts out," says Athena Coustenis, head of the European half of the TSSM mission. Small, cold moons like this are not supposed to be volcanic, and it remains unclear whether the plume originates in a sea of liquid water, or from warm caverns in the crust. The latest results from the Cassini probe provide conflicting indications on how much salt the plume contains, but a high concentration would suggest that it originated in an ocean.

The surface of Titan - TSSM's ultimate destination - remained hidden until the Cassini mission parachuted the Huygens probe onto its surface in 2005. We now know that Titan presents a bewildering landscape of desert dunes, mountains of water ice, and methane rivers and lakes. With a panoply of cameras and other instruments, TSSM will find out more about the giant moon's make-up, including whether it has a watery ocean under its icy surface.

Titan also provides a unique opportunity to splashdown and sail on an alien sea: it is the only world we know, besides our own, with seas on its surface. So in the most audacious part of the mission, TSSM will launch a pair of anachronistic explorers; a hot-air balloon to peer down on the deserts and mountains (see "Balloon for an alien moon"), and a small raft to bob about in the sea of liquid methane and ethane.

Titan provides a unique opportunity to splashdown and sail on an alien sea
The raft will splash down in Kraken Mare, near Titan's north pole, which at more than 1000 kilometres across is the moon's largest body of liquid. During the 4 hours its batteries are expected to last, the craft will scan the surface and sample the frigid fluid - its temperature is around -180 °C - to analyse the carbon-based chemicals known to be present. These molecules are generated not by life, as far as we know, but by ultraviolet light from the sun driving reactions in the atmosphere. From there they are thought to fall to the surface, perhaps caught in methane rainstorms. Titan's surface might hold more organic material even than Earth.

The big question is how much headway these molecules have made along the road to life. The raft will carry a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer to identify complex chemicals. It may seem improbable that life would be able to progress at such low temperatures but, if it has, the lander should catch its scent.

One of the chemical characteristics of life, on Earth at least, is its ability to distinguish between mirror-image molecules, generally preferring left-handed to right-handed structures. The lander's instruments will be able to tell if one handedness predominates. Terrestrial life also leaves it mark on the mix of isotopes in the molecules it makes: plants on Earth prefer carbon-12 to the heavier carbon-13, for example. If similar processes are at work on Titan, the lander should find them.

It all sounds splendid, but this expedition remains far off. The decision to prioritise the Jupiter mission means our return to Saturn will be delayed. At best, it will launch in 2024 or 2025, says Jonathan Lunine of JPL, who leads NASA's involvement in TSSM. The journey will then take a full nine years. So, fingers crossed, by 2035 or thereabouts, instruments built on Earth could be soaring in a balloon over Titan, and riding the ocean waves on our maiden voyage on an alien sea.

Balloon for an alien moon
"If you want to put a balloon anywhere in the solar system, Titan is the place," says Athena Coustenis of the Paris-Meudon Observatory in France, who heads the European half of the Titan Saturn System Mission (TSSM). "It is much easier than Venus or Mars. Actually it is easier than Earth."

Titan's gravity is one-tenth that of Earth's, and the atmosphere is denser. The weather is calm, too. Coustenis doesn't expect storms to hit the balloon. Perhaps the worst that will happen is a rare shower of methane rain, which might coat the balloon with dark particles of the organic gunk that is created in the upper atmosphere.

The craft will rely on hot gas for buoyancy. As it is parachuted into Titan's atmosphere, a device containing a highly radioactive isotope of plutonium and capable of generating almost 2 kilowatts of heat will warm up the gases in the envelope above (see diagram). This is a nuclear-powered hot-air balloon.

Borne by the gentle east-west winds recently mapped by Cassini, the balloon should then start drifting undisturbed at an altitude of about 10 kilometres. It should take about six months to travel 16,000 kilometres and circumnavigate Titan.

The craft should get a fine view of the moon's eerily Earth-like landscape. The equator is dominated by a range of water-ice mountains named Xanadu and a series of great deserts with parallel-combed dunes composed of dry, gritty particles of organic material that has rained from the sky.

Sampling this stuff is not in the plan at the moment, but it's not out of the question, says Jonathan Lunine, who leads NASA's involvement in TSSM. "We might look at being able to drop a package on a tether, or land the balloon to collect material."

The balloon might not even be entirely at the mercy of the winds: it could be fitted with a motor-driven propeller. Lunine has suggested exploiting the possibility that the winds may blow in different directions at different altitudes. By changing altitude to catch wind blowing the right way, it might be able to tack back on itself, he suggests.

If it is lottery-winner lucky, the balloon may even spot a watery sea on the surface of the moon. From time to time, a comet or asteroid must hit Titan, smashing its crust and melting some of the ice. Lunine calculates that these pools could persist for more than 100,000 years for the largest impacts. And with all those complex organic molecules lying around, who knows what kind of primordial soup could be brewing there...

Stephen Battersby is a writer based in London
 
Hopefully the mission to Europa will be saved.

One Astrobiologist’s Plan to Save the Search for Alien Life
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/ ... -missions/
By Dave MosherEmail Author August 27, 2012 | 6:30 am | Categories: Space

A conceptual illustration of the Europa Jupiter System Mission, or EJSM, which consists of an orbiter for both Europa and Ganymede. Image: NASA/Michel Carroll
Jupiter’s moon Europa hides an ocean of water beneath its icy crust that might harbor extraterrestrial life.

Unfortunately, big dollar signs have kept alive the fictional decree in Arthur C. Clarke’s Space Odyssey series to leave Europa alone: No robot has ever landed on, drilled into or orbited the chilly world. Only a handful of spacecraft have flown by.

A panel of scientists determined in 2011 that NASA’s plans to explore the moon with a single spacecraft, called the Jupiter Europa Orbiter, or JEO, would cost about $4.7 billion. That amount of cash, they wrote, “is so high that both a decrease in mission scope and an increase in NASA’s planetary budget are necessary to make it affordable.”

But even before the panel slammed the mission’s financial feasibility, astrobiologist Pabulo Henrique Rampelotto of Brazil’s Federal University of Pampa was plotting to save exploration of Europa.

In a study published July 13 in Astrobiology, Rampelotto argues that nixing one large orbiter and instead sending three small spacecraft — two orbiters and a probe carrying surface impactors — could spread out both the cost and the risk while hitting all of JEO’s science goals, and then some.

“[T]he main advantages are the complete access to the habitability of Europa, simpler mission design and low cost for each mission,” Rampelotto wrote in an e-mail to Wired. “Europa is considered the prime candidate in the search for life in our solar system. Its ocean may be in direct contact with the rocky mantle beneath, where the conditions could be similar to those on Earth’s biologically rich sea floor.”


Both NASA and the European Space Agency hope to explore Europa and Ganymede, another of Jupiter’s moons, sometime in the next two decades because both bodies may hide a liquid ocean. In the joint space exploration plan, called the Europa Jupiter System Mission, NASA would launch JEO within this decade. Around the same time that spacecraft launches, Europe would rocket its own Jupiter Ganymede Orbiter into deep space.

Budget hawks, however, aren’t buying into NASA’s $4.7 billion dream. Accounting for other higher-priority missions, JEO would stretch further NASA’s shrinking annual planetary science budget of $1.5 billion.

“I believe you will not find someone who continues to support the $4.7 billion … mission concept,” Rampelotto said. “And that is interesting because before the release, no one was considering the possibility of an alternative mission concept.”

'Europa is considered the prime candidate in the search for life in our solar system.'
— Pabulo Henrique Rampelotto
Rampelotto beat the panelists to the punch by proposing his three-spacecraft mission.
If built and launched within the next few years, mission one — an orbiter to measure the thickness of Europan ice and see how deep its oceans go — could reach Europa between 2020 and 2025. A second orbiter would launch a few years later, map the surface in visible and infrared light, and determine if any organic chemicals are present.

“Mission two is technically easier than mission one and could be launched very soon too,” Rampelotto wrote. “After we have those results from missions one and two, mission three would be mature enough to be launched.”

That mission would pound the surface with impactors, penetrate between 3 and 33 feet of ice, and then beam data about the ice’s composition to Earth. It’s unlikely any impactor would reach the subsurface ocean, however, because the thinnest ice may be 1.8 miles thick. Even below that depth, only lakes of water far above the ocean may be locked in the icy crust.

“But, if delivered in potential landing sites where liquid water from the ocean could have recently reached the surface or near surface, we could analyze indirectly the ocean composition, including signals of life,” Rampelotto wrote.

Rampelotto’s plan to barnstorm Europa offers no concrete costs for each mission, which he said would require “advanced studies” to determine. So the idea isn’t without its critics. “NASA team leaders … have advised me that penetrators are difficult and risky to deliver and the best option continues to be a lander,” Rampelotto wrote.

Bob Pappalardo, a planetary scientist who studies Europa and is helping NASA develop future missions to the moon, said Rampelotto’s scheme is a logical one during tight budgetary times. But he noted saving money by splitting up a big mission into smaller ones brings about another issue: fear of commitment.

“The reality is that NASA is not going to want to fund or begin a program of missions, based on the reaction to the Mars sample return suggestion,” said Pappalardo, who wasn’t involved in Rampelotto’s study. “That went over like a lead balloon [at the White House], in terms of being a long-term budgetary relationship.”

Pappalardo hopes that, if there are signs of a recovering U.S. economy in the next few years, they will spur the current presidential administration to open its tight wallet.

“Right now the goal is to do anything at Europa,” he said. “I really hope we’ll come back to our senses soon. I don’t see the vision for planetary science that was present in the past.”

“We need to be planning on the future,” he said. “As it stands, in a few years, we won’t be launching anything. We’re in danger of losing our leadership in planetary science.”
 
Maybe no geysers as well. Some old geezer imagined them?

Now you see it, now you don't. Europa's 200-kilometre-high water jets may have been downgraded from major discovery to major mystery. Follow-up searches have yet to see the geysers again, while older observations don't seem to support their existence. Some people are now wondering if the jets are far rarer than expected – or if they were ever there to begin with.

"It's a real puzzle now," said Donald Shemansky of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, who presented the analysis of spacecraft data at the American Geophysical Union conference in San Francisco on 18 December that contradicted the idea of regularly erupting plumes.

We already suspected that Jupiter's icy moon Europa had a vast ocean of water beneath its frozen crust. But excitement surged last year when a team led by Lorenz Roth of the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas, announced that the Hubble Space Telescope had spotted a small bump of water coming from Europa's south pole, meaning the moon was shooting its insides out into space.

This made the moon an ideal target for orbital probes to attempt to fly through the jets and detect the presence of life. ...

http://www.newscientist.com/article...sappear-in-a-cloud-of-mystery.html#.VJgngF4gA
 
A plan to launch a spacecraft to Jupiter's moon Europa in the 2020s passed a major hurdle, as NASA approved the mission concept and gave the go ahead to move forward into the formulation stage of development.

Sending a flyby mission to the icy moon of Jupiter is considered key in helping scientists determine how likely life is to exist there. If the probe shows that conditions on Europa would permit microbial life, other moons in the solar system, such as Saturn's moon Enceladus, might host life as well.

The current plan would see the spacecraft do 45 flybys of Europa while orbiting Jupiter every two weeks. Science goals include taking images of the icy surface, as well as remotely probing the moon's interior and composition.

"Today we're taking an exciting step from concept to mission in our quest to find signs of life beyond Earth," said John Grunsfeld, associate administrator for NASA's Science Mission Directorate, in a statement. ...

http://www.space.com/29713-europa-m...id=612741830141030400&adbpl=tw&adbpr=15431856
 
Sounds to me like NASA are big Arthur C Clarke fans. 2010: Odyssey Two, saw earth men traveling to the very same Moon. In NASAs case its 2020...spooky.
 
Europa is an ice-covered moon orbiting Jupiter that likely hosts an undergound ocean. Perhaps that ocean contains life. Perhaps it doesn’t. But we’re not going to know for sure until we send a probe there to check things out.

NASA announced last week that it’s one step closer to flying by Europa dozens of times after launching in the 2020s. The mission concept was approved and funding is ongoing. To get under that ice (virtually), NASA could include a radar instrument called REASON(Radar for Europa Assessment and Sounding: Ocean to Near-surfaces). But what if we were to eventually send a robotic landing mission?

Britney Schmitt, a member of the Europa mission team, told a conference last week that her team in Antarctica is testing out the very techniques that could be used at Europa, hundreds of millions of kilometers away. [Photos: Europa, Mysterious Icy Moon of Jupiter]

http://www.space.com/29732-jupiter-...id=613466582598037504&adbpl=tw&adbpr=15431856
 
Sounds to me like NASA are big Arthur C Clarke fans. 2010: Odyssey Two, saw earth men traveling to the very same Moon. In NASAs case its 2020...spooky.

Yes, and look what happened to them.

Which part of "All these worlds are yours - except Europa. Attempt no landings there" do NASA not understand?!
 
The search of life beneath the ice: why we’re going back to Europa

Last month NASA gave the “all systems go” for a new mission to Europa. But why go back? After all, we’re still sifting through the data from the Galileo probes fly-bys from more than a decade ago.

The short answer: it’s all about life.

The Jovian moons – named after Jupiter’s lovers by Simon Marius – have been a source of scientific speculation since Galileo trained his telescope on Jupiter in 1610, announcing his discovery in the Sidereal Messenger.

But the idea that Europa and other moons of Jupiter might harbour life is relatively new, as is the notion they might have hidden oceans beneath their icy surfaces. Indeed, these speculations demonstrate just how fast our conceptions of the solar system, and life, can change. ...

Read more at http://www.deepstuff.org/the-search...ere-going-back-to-europa/#mZ1HD5mEb1w2T6uu.99
 
Didn't they see the well-known space documentary from 1968?
The one where we were explicitly told to attempt no landing on Europa.
 
Didn't they see the well-known space documentary from 1968?
The one where we were explicitly told to attempt no landing on Europa.
Or what? In 2061: Odyssey Three we land on Europa without consequence or interference from the monoliths.

In 3001 it's revealed that at the end of 2061 the Europa monolith asks for orders from extra-solar monoliths and receives an order to destroy humanity, but then the Europa monolith was surely powerful enough to stop us from landing on Europa in the first place (that whole bit about turning Jupiter into a star and all....), so the destroy humanity orders are not because we landed there. We were weighed by the monoliths against the potential of the Europans, just as the monolith weighed the Europans against the natives of Jupiter in deciding to turn Jupiter into a star to help the Europans along.
 
Or what? In 2061: Odyssey Three we land on Europa without consequence or interference from the monoliths.

In 3001 it's revealed that at the end of 2061 the Europa monolith asks for orders from extra-solar monoliths and receives an order to destroy humanity, but then the Europa monolith was surely powerful enough to stop us from landing on Europa in the first place (that whole bit about turning Jupiter into a star and all....), so the destroy humanity orders are not because we landed there. We were weighed by the monoliths against the potential of the Europans, just as the monolith weighed the Europans against the natives of Jupiter in deciding to turn Jupiter into a star to help the Europans along.

Thanks Kamalktk - that has saved me a lot of money in buying AC's books.... now, can we all gather around to learn all about "Spoiler" button :)
 
In the Empire Strikes Back Vader tells Luke a secret about his father. Thats not spoilt owt as it?
 
Back
Top