• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Is Light God?

KeyserXSoze

Gone But Not Forgotten
(ACCOUNT RETIRED)
Joined
Jun 2, 2002
Messages
944
http://www.al.com/news/citymagazine/index.ssf?/base/news/1077966928214300.xml
Divine Light?

A new book seeks God in the details of quantum physics

02/28/04

DALE SHORT, Contributing Writer

"If this light bothers you, we can sit somewhere else," Lee Baumann tells me. We've just settled onto the couch of his suburban living room, and the big picture window is blazing with late-afternoon sunshine.

"Light is fine with me," I tell him. And because light is generally no big deal, neither of us realizes the irony of the exchange.

The premise of Baumann's new book is that light is a big deal. In fact, he asks, what if light is... quite literally... God?

On first approach, the idea sounds like the kind of musing that rises with the smoke of a hookah at a late-night gathering of grad students convened in a shabby apartment to debate the mysteries of the universe.

Which is why, Baumann explains, he's spent 20 years assembling his evidence: experiments in quantum physics textbooks, and quotes from some of the great scientific minds of our time. The result is the book God at the Speed of Light: The Melding of Science and Spirituality.

The concept is spurring discussion on Internet boards and (by sheer chance, according to the author) has even infiltrated Hollywood. The director of the network TV series Joan of Arcadia credits Baumann's book as one of a handful that influenced her concept of the show: a modern takeoff on the Joan of Arc story, about a small-town teenage girl who is regularly visited by God.

How did Baumann arrive at his God-as-light theory? In a word, slowly.

"I grew up in a fundamentalist church," he says, "but in childhood I had some experiences that started me questioning the idea of a higher intelligence, and in college I questioned it even more."

Baumann is a trim, 40-ish man with graying hair and a short beard, and the cadences of his speech sound, not like a preacher, but rather a physician or teacher, both of which he happens to be. He left private practice to work as a corporate consultant in the medical field.

"By the time I began my clinical practice, I was definitely a religious skeptic. But over the years, when I'd read books about physics and about near-death experiences, I kept pulling out all these spiritual or supernatural elements, trying to classify them, which eventually led to writing the book."

In a nutshell, Baumann's argument deals with what he calls "the three omni's":

"Light has been proven to be omnipresent, which means it's everywhere in the universe at once. And as an entity for which time doesn't exist, light is omniscient because it's aware of everything in past, present and future.

"For the third part, light's omnipotence, I have to take physicists at their word because it's a very complex concept. But basically, when scientists try to measure the energy levels of electrons or atoms, they come up with infinities, which makes the equation meaningless.

"They have to perform what Stephen Hawking calls a 'mathematical trick' to eliminate the infinity aspect and let the equation work. The technique is called 're-normalization.' You can find out more about it on the Internet, but basically it means that light appears to have infinite energy.

"And of course, omnipresence, omniscience and omnipotence are the same qualities that we use to describe a supreme being. Add the fact that people who undergo near-death experiences repeatedly experience the sensation of entering into a great light, and the concept is just very convincing for me. Very logical."

This is probably a good time for a brief public service message, for readers who are over 40: If you haven't kept up closely with developments in science since you finished school, your concept of how the universe works is as obsolete as the eight-track tape and the vacuum tube.

The orderly cosmos described in our old science textbooks was the brainchild of Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727), famous deviser of the theory of gravity (apple falling from tree, etc.) and father of the many universal laws that proceeded from it. Today's textbooks refer to his immensely influential view of things as "the Newtonian universe." Think of that system as a place for every galaxy, and every galaxy in its place.

But then came the 20th century, which gave us Albert Einstein and ushered in the branch of physics known as quantum mechanics. Einstein and his colleagues made literally earth-shaking discoveries that (a) brought us atomic weapons, and (b) poked Newton's theories full of black holes. The same mathematical formula that made possible Hiroshima and Nagasaki showed us a drastically revised world that, at the level of the atom, is all but incomprehensible to a logical mind.

In this new universe, order and symmetry and the neat proofs of geometry are, it turns out, not the rule but the exception. Light and matter coexist, uneasily, with pockets of anti-matter so dense they consume even light rays into their black maw.

The very unpredictability of physical events has become its own branch of science, known as "chaos theory," and detailed for the lay reader in James Gleick's popular book Chaos.

This frightening and confusing universe is not some random speculation, Baumann emphasizes, but is drawn from the known facts as the world's leading experts now understand them.

"I admit, the concepts are so far out they don't make any sense," he says. "So a little humility goes a long way, for all of us. You always have to be prepared to change your hypotheses. But the main concepts have been accepted now for decades, and this is the best knowledge we have."

The notion of light being "aware" of anything, much less the future, sounds to the skeptic like a touchy-feely, New Age invention. But it's proven scientific fact.

Baumann's book gives an overview of two historic physics experiments performed to determine the nature of light. One, the "double slit" experiment, proved that light waves behave differently when they're being studied than they do in isolation. The other, known as the "quantum eraser," went a step further, showing that light waves can actually anticipate future experiments and alter their behavior accordingly, "which, from a Newtonian standpoint," Baumann adds, "is something that could never, ever occur."

The larger implications of light's metaphysical shenanigans are even more mind-boggling. In God at the Speed of Light, Baumann introduces the concept with an analogy from physicist Nick Herbert:


One of the main quantum facts of life is that we radically change whatever we observe. Legendary King Midas never knew the feel of silk or a human hand after everything he touched turned to gold. Humans are stuck in a similar Midas-like predicament: we can't directly experience the true texture of reality because everything we touch turns to matter.


In other words, our everyday lives are technically an illusion. The objects and surfaces that we perceive as real are only the temporary intersection of our consciousness with the "true" universe, made entirely of energy.

"Which raises the question of this wooden floor," Baumann adds, tapping it with his heel. "If we weren't here looking at it, would this floor still exist? Well, it would, but it exists only as a nebulous, ill-defined mass of wave forms. It's not until some type of measurement or observation occurs, and you have what's called 'the collapse of the wave function,' that the nebulous mass of waves solidify into concrete, particulate matter."

Likewise, Baumann had no idea that the publication of his book (by the A.R.E. Press, which stands for Association for Research and Enlightenment, part of a Virginia foundation honoring the work of the famous clairvoyant Edgar Cayce) had solidified into the consciousness of a TV mogul until he was searching the Internet last fall for mentions of God at the Speed of Light.

One of the Google hits was the text of an interview with Barbara Hall, a Hollywood insider best known for her role in creating such shows as E.R., Chicago Hope, and Northern Exposure, promoting her new TV series Joan of Arcadia.

"I was totally blown over," Baumann recalls. "She named my book as one of a few that had helped inspire her to create the new series. Since then, things have just gone wild with the book's reception. It's been great."

He makes it a point to catch every episode of Joan, and so far he's impressed: "It's great family entertainment, and it has a good spiritual basis, good values. And of course, the actors are phenomenal - Mary Steenburgen, Joe Mantegna, and all the rest.

"I think there's really been a hunger for spiritual subjects since 9-11," Baumann says. "People are viewing their priorities in a new light. If they weren't questioning their lives before, they began to when they saw the scope of that tragedy. Why would a loving God allow something like this to happen?"

But Baumann's concept of God as omnipresent, familiar light which, at the moment of death, steers our true path home to the afterlife raises troubling questions of its own.

Such as: If a tunnel of light is the typical near-death experience, what do blind people see when they die?

Baumann doesn't hesitate. "There's a writer named Kevin Williams, who's compiled an extensive collection of case histories on his website neardeath.com, and it turns out that blind people see light, just as sighted people do."

So if light is God, why does too much God give us skin cancer?

This time, Baumann hesitates. "Good question. Light definitely has destructive properties, especially the ultraviolet spectrum, which is part of light," he says. "On the other hand, lasers are a form of light too, and they're used in medicine today to destroy those same kinds of cancerous growths. I don't know. It's hard for me to relate destructive qualities to a loving God."

And perhaps the biggest question of all: if light actually represents good and darkness represents evil, what about recent data that suggests the universe has far more dark material than light? Is goodness, by definition, a losing battle?

"Another excellent question," Baumann says. "I'm still struggling with that. One thing I've found fascinating is that scientists have examined regions of space that are total darkness in a total vacuum, and they've found that each cubic meter of darkness contains more than 400 million photons. They're non-visible photons, electromagnetic radiation. But they're light particles still, in total darkness.

"Could black holes be the evil of the universe? It's an interesting theory, but obviously nobody has the answer. I suspect it's just a matter of time until someone finds sound scientific answers to that. But right now, it's just speculation."

A typical audience at one of Baumann's lectures on the subject, these days, is composed of some true believers who share with him, afterward, their own near-death experiences - as well as some true skeptics, who tell him he makes some interesting points but they can't quite buy his theory.

"That's fine," he says. "They're in the same place I was, many years ago. I mean, most of these physics concepts are so unbelievable that no rational human being can accept them, the first time around. I reviewed some of these experiments thoroughly, 15 or 20 times, before I finally understood what the ramifications were.

"All I ask is that people keep an open mind."

Baumann's next book, which he's researching now, is another foray into the intersection of the scientific and the spiritual. It's a medical analysis of the trance-state "readings" done in the first half of the 20th century by Edgar Cayce, the clairvoyant whose foundation published God at the Speed of Light.

"Cayce is a fascinating figure," Baumann says, "and fortunately he was smart enough to hire a stenographer to document every trance state he was in, some 8,000 or 9,000 of them. Basically, in this self-induced hypnosis he was able to access the, for lack of a better word, collective unconscious, the source of all knowledge in the universe. He would diagnose, at a distance, people with medical conditions and prescribe treatments, some of them so futuristic that, even now, alternative medical groups are having trouble accepting them. But his success rate, at times, was phenomenal."

All of Cayce's readings are available on the Internet and CD-ROM. Baumann has actually traveled several times to the library in Virginia Beach to see the original hard copy.

"When they published my book, I barely knew who Cayce was, and now I'm really caught up in the implications of his work," Baumann says. "I'm beginning to believe there's no such thing as serendipity."

He laughs and squints out the window into the sunlight, sitting there with God smeared all across his face.
 
Ok, so he's read about Goethe (or possibly Turner)
 
Or he's been reading William Blake:

From the Auguries of Innocence:
God appears, and God is light
To those poor souls who dwell in night,
But does a human form display
To those who dwell in realms of day.


This sounds to be one of those books where mystical waffle is masquerading as physics.
 
Good post, Kayser!

If anybody really wants to blow one's mind along similiar lines, I can recommend the Science Fiction classic:

'A Voyage To Arcturus' (1920), by David Lindsay.

Therein it's suggested that even 'light' itself is just a shadow cast by the evil Demi-urge, of the book "Crystalman" to obscure the true nature of God.

A more Gnostic SF book it would be hard to find.

...

Information on recent deluxe edition: Savoy Books, 'A Voyage To Arcturus'. With a review by Michael Moorcock at the bottom of the webpage.

Online Copy: Litrix.Com 'A Voyage To Arcturus'
 
A 'Voyage to Arcturus' is an amazing book, and apparently influenced CS Lewis's Cosmic trilogy: "Out of the Silent Planet", "Perelandra" and "That Hideous Strength"

The influence is strongest in "Perelandra" (set on Venus) which is a very strange and dreamlike reworking of the story of the fall of mankind in Eden.
 
Re: Good post, Kayser!

AndroMan said:
If anybody really wants to blow one's mind along similiar lines, I can recommend the Science Fiction classic:

'A Voyage To Arcturus' (1920), by David Lindsay.

What a coincidence! I was thinking about that book in the morning. Thinkging about how interesting it was and the origin of the name Sutur. You can check it out for free at the Project Guttemberg Library online.
 
Re: Good post, Kayser!

AndroMan said:
'A Voyage To Arcturus' (1920), by David Lindsay.

Therein it's suggested that even 'light' itself is just a shadow cast by the evil Demi-urge, of the book "Crystalman" to obscure the true nature of God.
That's funny. I can remember when I was young and going to Catholic school suspecting that the heavenly 'light of God' that everyone was always singing about was evil and only masquerading as 'good.' :eek: Maybe that's because my eyes are sensitive to light.
 
Re: Re: Good post, Kayser!

Bannik said:
That's funny. I can remember when I was young and going to Catholic school suspecting that the heavenly 'light of God' that everyone was always singing about was evil and only masquerading as 'good.' :eek: Maybe that's because my eyes are sensitive to light.
Your obviously a Scots Calvinist at heart! ;)
 
I feel like slapping this guy. He has gotten several things wrong about physics, and seems to take some analogies a bit too far. I don't think that book would be worth wasting money on to be honest.
 
I read once that in the early early creation of the universe there was so much radiation that if you were to look up to the sky at night the sky would be white not black. I wonder how that works into the theory.
 
God is Light

Sounds like a bit of a crank. For one thing, God has a few other attributes which distinguish Himself from light: benevolence, for example, wisdom, justice, yada yada yada.

Also, since scientists have slowed light down to a crawl in experiments, they have exhibited an ability to control--even stop--light beyond the power of mirrors. "God" would therefore not be all-powerful at all. You could in principle lock him up in a cage from which he would not escape in any reasonable length of time.

Everybody is talking Quantum in the paranormal and parascientific communities nowadays. Fashionable and incomprehensible, the two qualities that are wanted to sell books, ideas and puff-n-stuff.

Light as God sounds kinda Zoroastrian-Manichean-Mary Eddy Bakerish. No wonder the Gnostic idea of an Evil Demiurge turns up in this thread. In the first century there were already masses of "New Agers" plundering pagan, judeo-christian, and mystical sources for elaborate para-scientific systems.

Nothing new under the Sun. Well, not in the philosophico-religio-magico-nonsensical arts.
 
Victorian Novels

I did a quick peek at the Internet for Victorian novels.

This site is mostly British Literature classics and near-classics (lots of Bulwer-Lytton and Dickens) but has a bibliography if you are close to a good library.

Victorian Novels

I started reading a novel by a young lady with good connections entitled The Semi-Detached House, published by Virago books. It is mildy amusing--not as good or as stylish as Jane Austen but it does has a lot of sub-urban local colour, including the mysterious omnipresent parrot whose calls torment the entire neighbourhood but to whom nobody will own up. More along the lines of Diary of a Provincial Lady from the 1930's.

Nothing Fortean yet, but what do you expect from a semi-detached house? Piano-playing at all hours, apparently.
 

"For the third part, light's omnipotence, I have to take physicists at their word because it's a very complex concept. But basically, when scientists try to measure the energy levels of electrons or atoms, they come up with infinities, which makes the equation meaningless.

"They have to perform what Stephen Hawking calls a 'mathematical trick' to eliminate the infinity aspect and let the equation work. The technique is called 're-normalization.' You can find out more about it on the Internet, but basically it means that light appears to have infinite energy.

Ummmm, no.

When "scientists try to measure the energy levels of electrons and atoms" the don't come up with infinities. Also light doesn't have infinite energy. The guy seems to have picked up a few random ideas and then misinterpreted them in the "light" of his own pet theory. ;)
 
I know very little about physics, and even I could see his observations were a little odd:

"Light has been proven to be omnipresent, which means it's everywhere in the universe at once."
Eh? If I turn a cardboard box upside down and look inside it, I can just see blackness. Because there's no light in the box.
One, the "double slit" experiment, proved that light waves behave differently when they're being studied than they do in isolation.
Surely when they're being studied, they'd be in isolation?
"When they published my book, I barely knew who Cayce was, and now I'm really caught up in the implications of his work," Baumann says. "I'm beginning to believe there's no such thing as serendipity."
I'll just go and fetch us some tinfoil hats, then, Lee :)
 
taras said:
I'll just go and fetch us some tinfoil hats, then, Lee :)

But for goodness sake, please doon't wear them (especially near me!) on a bright, sunny winter day when there's snow on the ground. It'd give a whole new meaning to the expression "God blind me". ;)
 
Actually he's right about the double slit experiment

And technically there are virtual photon/antiphoton pairs being produced in empty space - but so are other virtual particles
 
"Light has been proven to be omnipresent, which means it's everywhere in the universe at once. And as an entity for which time doesn't exist, light is omniscient because it's aware of everything in past, present and future.

It's not omnipresent, because I can guarantee you there's no light inside my asshole right now.

Also, if it's omniscient, please figure out a way to manipulate the data it's carrying. That would be something awesome.

Third, I love the way people will come up with some new concept, which does catch on, because people love fads, and weak minds always want something to believe in.

In case I've offended anyone here, I'm sorry. I'll give you a flashlight. :)
 
The Frog said:
It's not omnipresent, because I can guarantee you there's no light inside my asshole right now.

No white light, but the "light" spectrum could also include ultraviolet,infared,x-ray or corpuscular radiation(solar wind) which can "fly" right through the top of your head and out your asshole and right through the earth and out the other side.;)
 
He mentions how UV-radiation harms us, and how he has difficulty getting this to fit with a good God. What about the fact that if it wasn't because of the ozone layer, life on Earth would be having a very hard time. And gamma rays as well, they don't seem to have "purpose" other than destruction. Why does God have those then?
 
Matthew said:
No white light, but the "light" spectrum could also include ultraviolet,infared,x-ray or corpuscular radiation(solar wind) which can "fly" right through the top of your head and out your asshole and right through the earth and out the other side.;)


That would explain that burni--- uhm... nothing.
 
Back
Top