• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Joan of Arc 'Relics' Tested for Authenticity

ramonmercado

CyberPunk
Joined
Aug 19, 2003
Messages
58,323
Location
Eblana
Joan of Arc 'relics' to be tested

A team of scientists is hoping to determine whether charred human remains on display in a French museum are those of 15th Century heroine Joan of Arc. Forensic expert Philippe Charlier and his team will spend six months testing remains including a rib and some skin.

The relics are said to have been found at the stake in the Normandy town of Rouen where Joan was burned in 1431.

France's national heroine - canonised in 1920 - was convicted of heresy and witchcraft and burned alive aged 19.

Dr Charlier said the tests would not determine with certainty whether the remains are Joan of Arc's - but they would help to work out how likely they are to be genuine.

The rib, currently housed at a museum in Chinon owned by the Archdiocese of Tours, is "remarkably well preserved" according to Dr Charlier.

Researchers at the Raymond-Poincare Hospital in Garches near Paris will use DNA testing and carbon dating to determine whether the bone belonged to a woman, as well as its exact age, Dr Charlier said.

Complex case

He said no DNA comparison with possible descendants will be carried out because Joan of Arc's family tree is probably false.


LEGEND OF ST JOAN
1412: Born in Domremy, Champagne
1425: Saints' voices tell her she will be France's saviour in Hundred Year's War
1429: Helps mount a campaign against the English in Orleans
1430: Captured and ransomed to English, condemned for heresy and witchcraft
1431: Burned at the stake
1455: Trial verdict annulled
1909: Beatified
1920: Made a saint


Dr Charlier said Joan of Arc was burned three times on 30 May in 1431, following her trial in the Normandy town of Rouen. She died of smoke inhalation.

Nothing was said to remain after the third cremation except her ashes - which were reportedly thrown in the River Seine in Paris.

Dr Charlier has a track record in forensic history.

Last year he identified the cause of death of Agnes Sorel, mistress of the 15th Century French king Charles VII, as mercury poisoning, but was unable to determine whether it was murder.




Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/w ... 711784.stm

Published: 2006/02/14 12:18:02 GMT

© BBC MMVI
 
Joan of Arc remains 'are fakes'

Bones thought to be the holy remains of 15th Century French heroine Joan of Arc were in fact made from an Egyptian mummy and a cat, research has revealed.
In 1867, a jar was found in a Paris pharmacy attic, along with a label claiming it held relics of Joan's body.

But new forensic tests suggest that the remains date from between the third and sixth centuries BC - hundreds of years before Joan was even born.

The study has been reported in the news pages of the Nature journal.

Forensic scientist Dr Philippe Charlier, who led the investigation, told Nature: "I'd never have thought that it could be from a mummy."

Rouen relics

France's national heroine - canonised in 1920 - was convicted of heresy and witchcraft and burned alive in 1431, aged just 19.

The "relics" were said to have been found at the stake in the Normandy town of Rouen where Joan was burned.

The remains consisted of a charred-looking human rib, chunks of what appeared to be blackened wood, a 15-centimetre fragment of linen, and a cat thigh bone.

In medieval Europe it was common practice to throw black cats into the pyres of supposed witches.

Recognised as genuine and sacred by the Church, the "remains" are now housed in a museum in Chinon belonging to the Archdiocese of Tours.

Stink bombshell

Dr Charlier, from the Raymond Poincare Hospital in Garches, near Paris, obtained permission to study the relics from the France's Catholic Church last year.

He used a range of scientific tests such as spectrometry, electron microscopy, and pollen analysis.

Those tests dated the bone to between the seventh and third centuries BC, Dr Charlier said. The cat bone dated from the same period and also was mummified.

The researchers also found pollen from pine trees, probably from resin used in ancient Egyptian embalming. Pines did not grow in Normandy during the 15th Century.

Dr Charlier also recruited two smell experts, Sylvaine Delacourte and Jean-Michel Duriez, from the perfume industry.

They were independently asked to sniff the relics as well as nine other samples of bone and hair from Dr Charlier's lab without being told what they were.

Both smelled hints of "burnt plaster" and "vanilla" in the samples. The plaster smell backs up claims that Joan was burnt on a plaster stake, to make the spectacle last longer.

But a vanilla smell is inconsistent with cremation. It comes from the compound vanillin, which is released during the decomposition of a body.

Medicinal purpose

Analysis of the black crust covering the rib and the cat bone showed that it was not caused by fire, but an embalming mix of wood resins, bitumen and chemicals such as malachite.

In medieval times and later, powdered mummy remains were used for medicinal purposes, "to treat stomach ailments, long or painful periods, all blood problems," Philippe Charlier told the Associated Press.

The researchers' assumption is that a 19th Century apothecary was behind the fake, and transformed the remains of an Egyptian mummy into a fake relic, Dr Charlier said.

Why it was done remains a mystery.

According to Philippe Charlier it was probably not for money: "Perhaps it was for religious reasons.

"Perhaps it was created to increase the importance of the process of beatification in 1909."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6527105.stm
 
Bones thought to be the holy remains of 15th Century French heroine Joan of Arc were in fact made from an Egyptian mummy and a cat

Purrfect!
 
Yu-Ani or AQr-Khem

Can't we calmly sit down as friends and reach the compromise position that Joan of Arc was actually "Yu-Ani of Ar-Khem," an ancient Egyptian were-cat who survived until the 15th Century AD?
 
Only if I can think of a really awful pun to support your theory!
 
Back
Top