- Joined
- Sep 27, 2004
- Messages
- 11
Just a question that hit me while I was trying to figure out how to tie the velcro fasteners on my shoes:
A moron and a normal person see what appears to the normal person to be a jet in the sky. The moron, who doesn't know much of anything, doesn't know what it is and declares it to be a UFO while the normal person declares it to be a jet. Later it turns out the object really was a plane so the normal person's identification of a identified flying object was incorrect thereby rendering their original observation to be in hindsight a misidentified identified flying object while the moron's observation remains the same, a unidentified flying object which may be misidentified. Anyway, given the facts, both people originally must have seen a unidentified flying object and as such identified the object as being a unidentified flying object and therefore both knew what it was and were both correct, weren't they? :gaga:
PS: I told him it wasn't something called a jet!
A moron and a normal person see what appears to the normal person to be a jet in the sky. The moron, who doesn't know much of anything, doesn't know what it is and declares it to be a UFO while the normal person declares it to be a jet. Later it turns out the object really was a plane so the normal person's identification of a identified flying object was incorrect thereby rendering their original observation to be in hindsight a misidentified identified flying object while the moron's observation remains the same, a unidentified flying object which may be misidentified. Anyway, given the facts, both people originally must have seen a unidentified flying object and as such identified the object as being a unidentified flying object and therefore both knew what it was and were both correct, weren't they? :gaga:
PS: I told him it wasn't something called a jet!