• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Piltdown Man Hoax / Forgery: Who Was Behind It?

taras

Least Haunted
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Messages
1,625
Location
Edinburgh
Piltdown: Cryptograms & Conan Doyle

Elementary, my dear scientists
By Jonathan Gornall
Is there proof that Conan Doyle was the Piltdown hoaxer?


FIFTY years ago this week, Dr J. S. Weiner, an eminent British palaeontologist, sat through a conference in London about early human beings, wondering idly why nobody had so much as mentioned Piltdown Man, the so-called Missing Link and Britain’s great contribution to the evolution debate. It was, he mused, as though Piltdown — a few bones and teeth unearthed in Sussex between 1912 and 1913 — was regarded by the palaeontology community as the relative whom nobody wanted to see at family gatherings: a skeleton, as it were, in the human family cupboard.
Examining the skull fragments, teeth and jawbone, he came to a shocking conclusion. Under a microscope, it was clear that the teeth had been shaped by a file. Piltdown Man was a fake. Far from being the Missing Link between people and their ape ancestors, the skull was barely 600 years old and the jaw, crudely amended and with teeth filed to fit patterns of human mastication, belonged to an orang-utan. In 1912, the whole question of human ancestry was open and, because Piltdown appeared to validate contemporary views, science saw what it wanted to see.

The story broke in The Times on November 21 of that year, and the witch-hunt was on. The finger pointed first at Charles Dawson, the lawyer who had dug up the bones in a Sussex gravel pit, but in the years since, almost nobody involved has escaped accusation. All along, though, one shadowy figure has haunted the margins of the case — Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the creator of Sherlock Holmes. He lived at Crowborough, a few miles from Dawson’s dig, which he visited. Read in the light of the hoax, his classic sci-fi adventure The Lost World, serialised in Strand Magazine just before the Piltdown find, appears to be littered with so many clues that even the dim Watson would have caught the drift. But, as Holmes was fond of saying: “You see, but you do not observe.” I was nudged back on the trail of Conan Doyle by the news that a vast cache of the author’s papers, bequeathed to the nation in 1997 on the death of his daughter Dame Jean, has remained unseen in mysterious legal limbo. Perhaps it contained a hint, or even a full confession. Conan Doyle, after all, had an interest in palaeontology, experience as a doctor working with teeth, access to all the Piltdown parts and a penchant for jokes. What’s more, he had known, met and flattered Dawson, who told a friend that the great man “seemed excited about the skull. He has kindly offered to drive me in his motor anywhere . . .”

Such as up the garden path, perhaps? Conan Doyle was a known prankster: he faked a photograph for his book The Lost World, with himself made up as the lead character, Professor Challenger.

Chris Stringer is the head of human origins at the Natural History Museum, whose office in South Kensington is next door to where the Piltdown remains languish in two drawers. He has little doubt that Dawson, an amateur palaeontologist seeking fame and the only man present when all the Piltdown pieces were found, was guilty. He concedes that Dawson might well have had an accomplice, and that there are “interesting coincidences” in The Lost World, but that’s all.

My last hope for an academic ally is in New York: Richard Milner, an associate in the anthropology department at the American Museum of Natural History and an internationally known Darwinian scholar. He first indicted Conan Doyle at the Linnean Society of London in 1997 but admits that his prime suspect has so far eluded conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. Despite his penchant for setting evolution to music — his startling show Charles Darwin, Live and In Concert, was hailed by Time Out as the “smartest show in NY” — Milner is a serious academic and not, sadly, keen to torpedo a lifetime’s reputation by allowing me to hijack his name.

Sometimes, though, enthusing about the clues that the great mystery writer appears to have strewn in his wake, Milner veers dangerously close to the conclusion I am willing him to reach. In his original copy of the Strand, he points out the photograph of “Challenger” — Conan Doyle, made up with false beard and eyebrows — and the author’s signature: “Yours truly (to use the conventional lie), George Challenger”.

“Conan Doyle does seem to be saying, ‘Catch me if you can.’. I mean, what’s the name of the professor? Challenger!” The challenge, Milner theorises, was to a scientific establishment that had mocked his belief in spiritualism. “I can imagine him getting totally p***ed off. ‘I’m the creator of Sherlock Holmes, don’t tell me I don’t know what’s rational and provable. I bet you scientists would go for the flimsiest evidence if it supported your most cherished beliefs’.”

So why didn’t he spring the trap? “A little something called the First World War,” Milner suggests. Intensely patriotic, Conan Doyle was advising the Government on a number of issues in the run-up to 1914. “If a man wants to influence war policy, he doesn’t go round saying, ‘Oh, by the way, that skull in Piltdown? I planted it. Ha ha ha’.”

And then Milner spills one clue from The Lost World that I had missed. At the time, cryptograms, codes using secret symbols, were all the rage in children’s magazines. In chapter 15 of The Lost World is a cave map. Milner believes it could be a tough cryptogram — and the smoking gun. There are only 18 characters, too few for an easy frequency analysis. But if so, he imagines that the message will say something like “Ape jaw, human skull”. He’d like to hear from an intrigued cryptographer. Armed with this suspicion, I reread the passage in the book where the explorers are handed the map, which Challenger believes at first is “clearly some sort of script”. “Unless,” says Summerlee, “we have come upon a primitive practical joker, which I should think would be one of the most elementary developments of man.”

Elementary? Well, quite, my dear Watson.


THE LOST CLUES

THE serialisation of The Lost World, in which Professor Challenger and his team find “missing link” apemen living in South America, began in the April 1912 edition of Strand Magazine — eight months before Charles Dawson told the Geological Society that he had found the remains of an early human fossil in a shallow gravel pit near the village of Piltdown in Sussex. Conan Doyle lived in Crowborough, a few miles from Piltdown, and Dawson later claimed that the dig produced its first finds within a year of the author’s arrival in the area in 1908. Work began on The Lost World in 1911. The narrator, journalist Edward D. Malone (a “most insignificant unit” on the Daily Gazette), is sent to grill Professor Challenger.

Clue one: Malone’s news editor denounces Challenger as “Sir John Mandeville redivivus”, a reference to an exposed literary fraudster. What about the bones he says he has found? “First one out of an Irish stew. Second one vamped up for the occasion. If you are clever enough and know your business, you can fake a bone as easily as you can fake a photograph.”

Clue two: Conan Doyle packs the book with references to the geological and palaeontological profile of Sussex and the Wealden clay in which Piltdown was found. Challenger spots a dinosaur’s footprint and exclaims “Wealden! I’ve seen them in the Wealden clay!”

Clue three: Challenger refers to Sir Edwin Lankester, director of natural history at the British Museum, as “my gifted friend”. Lankester, writing in 1906, had predicted the type of finds that might attend discovery of a “missing link”. The fraudulent Piltdown haul echoed his predictions. In 1876 Lankester had exposed the spirit-medium Henry Slade as a fraud and prosecuted him. Conan Doyle later came out as a spiritualist.

Clue four: Fear of an evolutionary bogeyman is evoked in The Lost World with a reference to the curupuri — a spirit feared by the Amazon tribes and described as a “kind of orang-utan”. Piltdown’s jawbone turned out to be that of an orang-utan.

If you think you can crack the cryptogram, e-mail [email protected]
 
Pictogram

Attached is Conan Doyle's cave map - the "cryptogram".
 
There is a much more devastating case against Charles Dawson,
whose history of faking artifacts was extensive. The case is made
very convincingly by John Evangelist Walsh in his 1996 book Unravelling
Piltown. Well worth a read. :)
 
There's another Doyle theory, put forward by Robert Anderson in 1996, that the cave map from The Lost World actually represents the Piltdown area.

If the map of the cave marked X - the one explorers use to escape - is superimposed on a Piltdown map:

The middle branch, which leads to a dead end in the book, leads to Barkham Manor, where Piltdown Man - another 'dead end' - was found.

The left branch - the true exit - leads to Moon's Farm. The explorers know they have reached the end of the passage when they see the moon.

Anderson writes as if Sherlock Holmes were investigating the case:

"You've lost me, Holmes. Other than its proximity to Barkham Manor, what significance could a golf course possibly have to the Piltdown mystery?"

"Ah, you disappoint me, Watson. How many holes are there on a course? And how many caves were there?"
 
Here is a list of suspects in the Piltsown Hoax, I haven't read through it yet though I remember reading the case for Hinton being the culprit a few years ago.
 
An inside job?

There is a big piece in the Sunday Times today (I think it might be UK only though but check):

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-531-855851,00.html

This theory is that it was carried out by bullied scientists at the British Museum specifically Charles P. Chatwin.

Selected quotes:

[Dr Kenneth] Oakley was convinced that the Piltdown fraud was a vengeful prank that went too far. The junior museum staff hated their boss and had contrived to make a fool of him. Smith Woodward's close friendship with [Charles] Dawson, well documented in archives, was the canvas on which they would paint their conspiracy. [Charles P.] Chatwin marshalled young palaeontologists, including Martin Hinton, and they planted an ape jaw and human brain case, suitably aged and stained, in the Piltdown gravel pit. When Piltdown ignited the world's interest, the conspirators swore to keep the secret until their dying day.

That many of them went on to have long, successful scientific careers meant reputations would have been devastated if they broke their oath of silence. Oakley told Reynolds and his fellow guests that he could not have made this news public in 1953, for he was still working at the museum and some of the conspirators were still alive and in positions of considerable power. "There would have been very serious consequences. It wasn't a crime, but it was an act of gross scientific fraud," says Reynolds. "Chatwin would have been fired, for a start, and since the perpetrators were still alive they would have had to testify at a thorough David Kelly-style inquiry. People would have wanted to know how science had been misled by virtually a whole department at the museum. Oakley would have suffered too, though he probably would have been exonerated eventually. But they all kept quiet."

Professor Chris Stringer, the NHM's merit researcher on hominids, finds it very plausible that Smith Woodward's unpopularity prompted such a prank. Stringer first came to the museum in 1969: "In those days, staff at the museum were part of the civil service and, like many public institutions, it was still very hierarchical. It is easy to see how this kind of environment could have spawned a practical joke, which later escalated out of hand."

"When the members of staff who worked there when I arrived in 1971 first came to the museum," says the vertebrate curator, Andy Currant, "they were still expected to iron the curator's newspaper each day before he arrived. It was definitely within the living memory of older members of staff that the more junior curators were treated more like servants than colleagues."

Blinded by ambition and self-importance, Smith Woodward fell for Dawson's lies. "The fact that the museum harboured a nest of hoaxers is extraordinary," says Reynolds. "But what was worse was that Smith Woodward was duped by Dawson, who was supposed to be his friend."

There's more evidence of a plot. When the loft in the museum's southwest tower was cleared out in the 1970s, a trunk bearing the initials of Martin Hinton came to light. Inside were bones and teeth stained in a similar manner to the Piltdown remains. Chris Stringer called these findings "very convincing". Claims that Hinton was the instigator of the Piltdown fraud were published in Nature magazine in 1996 and are the subject of a forthcoming book. Hinton had another motive beyond mere dislike of Smith Woodward: he was a Lamarckian. Lamarckism is a discredited theory of evolution that, unlike Darwinism, holds that traits acquired or lost during a creature's lifetime can be passed on to offspring. Though the Piltdown remains were not connected to this debate, did Hinton want to make sure that his hated Darwinist boss looked a fool?

Hinton's box of stained bones and teeth, perhaps the prototype forgeries, frames him squarely as a co-conspirator. There's more. Hinton went on to become keeper of zoology. In 1945 he retired and moved to Somerset (now Avon). He remained a respected, influential scientist; it's no surprise that Oakley did not want to incriminate him in 1953. But in 1954, Hinton met a BBC producer in Bristol, John Irving, who asked him about Piltdown. Hinton told him the forgery had been an inside job, but he denied responsibility and would not reveal the hoaxer's name because, he said, he was still alive. Hinton died in 1961.

Was it Chatwin he was protecting? Chatwin was still very much alive and respected. In 1920 he joined the Geological Survey, later becoming chief palaeontologist. Oakley told the dinner party that one of the culprits had later become a high-ranking civil servant. Of all the members of the museum's geological department in 1912, only Chatwin achieved "high rank" in the civil service. He died in 1971, four years before Oakley's revelatory meeting with Reynolds, when he said he was finally free to say who had done it.

and relevant to the start of this thread:

Many fanciful names were put forward as perpetrators of the hoax after its exposure, including that of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, celebrated creator of Sherlock Holmes. Holmes said: "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." The latest evidence echoes another quote: "It's elementary, my dear Watson."

And I must say, although a less exciting conclusion, this theory does have a lot of merit and unless someone unearths any direct evidence it has to be up there as one of the front runners (as far as I'm concerned anyway).

One (amongst many) interesting things:

Next month they will be re-exhibited for the first time since the fraud was exposed 50 years ago, as part of the commemorations for this quintessentially English saga.

Should be interesting :)

Emps
 
If your going through Piltdown, look out for the pub sign, a grinning skull thats winking.;)
 
By the accounts I have read of Conan Doyle, Unlike his fictional creation he too often "saw" but did not "observe", and was a pretty gullible guy. He was fooled and indeed promoted the Cottingley Fairies and refused to believed that his one -time friend Houdini did not have psychic powers and could not comprehend that meduims would dream of faking such abilities. ". If he did play jokes etc he should have applied some of his skeptical observations to his own beliefs which were virtually unshakeable such as in Spiritualism.
 
I seem to remember reading a news story last year in twhich it was stated that a suitcase had been found containing the kit that was used to fake the Piltdown bones.

Anyone one else remember reading it?

I'll try and track down some URLs
 
Arthur ASCII: You said:

I seem to remember reading a news story last year in twhich it was stated that a suitcase had been found containing the kit that was used to fake the Piltdown bones.

Anyone one else remember reading it?

I suspect it is the one mentioned in the article (and quoted in my post above) e.g.:

When the loft in the museum's southwest tower was cleared out in the 1970s, a trunk bearing the initials of Martin Hinton came to light. Inside were bones and teeth stained in a similar manner to the Piltdown remains.

Emps
 
Piltdown review points decisive finger at forger Dawson

Researchers have finished an eight-year study of one of the most infamous forgeries in the history of science - the fake human ancestor Piltdown Man.

They conclude that the forged fossils were made by one man: the prime suspect and "discoverer" Charles Dawson.

The human-like skull fragments and an ape-like jaw, complete with two teeth, shook the scientific world in 1912 but were exposed as a hoax in 1953.

New tests show the bones came from two or three humans and one orangutan.
What we've been able to demonstrate is a signature, a fingerprint throughout all of these specimens

The research, published in Royal Society Open Science, was a multi-disciplinary collaboration including palaeobiologists, historians, dental experts and ancient DNA specialists. ...

Full Story: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37021144
 
When Piltdown Man was unveiled before a meeting of London geologists in 1912, he was heralded as paleoanthropology's "missing link," the long-sought transitional form between modern humans and our great ape ancestor. He had a smallish skull, a chimp-like jaw, and a mixture of primitive and modern teeth to boot. Plus, he was a local; to this gathering of Brits, it would have seemed completely right and proper that humankind got its start just down the road in Sussex.

There was just one problem: He was a fake.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...wn-man-one-of-sciences-most-notorious-hoaxes/
 
The Piltdown hoax is still mentioned by some creationists as 'evidence' that there is a scientific conspiracy to discredit the biblical narrative. Even though scientists determined it was a hoax. It's nice to see some resolution to this episode.
 
Back
Top