• Forums Software Updates

    The forums will be undergoing updates this weekend: Saturday 7th - Sunday 8th June 2025.
    Little to no downtime is expected.
One Local Authority has been importing old Daleks for some
time and retraining them as classroom teachers.

But today's kids weren't so easily scared. By lunchtime on day
one the Daleks quit en masse at the sight of one of their
number, brain scooped out, being taken for wheelies in the
playground.

I blame the Local Authority. They should never have unmanned
the poor creatures by removing their right to exterminate. :hmph:
 
Its also frightening to think that intelligence may be reduced to an algorythm,

And by the way, the Daleks weren't that scary... Now Metal Mickey, thats scary
 
lucydru said:
I AM NEVER GOING TO BE FRIENDS WITH AN ANDROID, NEVER!

But Luce, I thought we are friends!

Niles"To err is human. Ergo all problems are caused by humans..."Calder
 
We already have Artificial Intelligence - Deeper Blue beating Kasparov was the first and last demonstration of that. We also have neural nets that can compose music. Doesn't mean that one can do the other. The true test of artificial intelligence will come when Deeper Blue decides that playing Chess is not enough and wants to go and watch Status Quo. What we have now are predictive algorithms. Given a specific task, any reasonably programmed machine can out perform a human (even now, apparently, playing Go). Any of these machines can also pass the Turing test, because they are inquisited by experts in their field. Artificial intelligence will come when a Chess computer can give a reason why it prefers "Twelfth Night" over "Macbeth", or when a musical neural net can tell you that "West Side Story" is the same as "Romeo and Juliette". Intelligence, in my opinion, can be defined not by how much you know, but the way in which you apply what you do know. Until an artificial intelligence can comment on something outside it's programming, it is not cogniecent. A chess playing, Shakespeare loving, mathematical genius is not alive if it can't tell you that no matter how hard you pump it, you burst tyre isn't getting any bigger!
 
Daleks

When I was a kid (about 1986ish), me, my Dad and my sister had been to visit Lancaster Castle. When we came out after doing the tour we saw, down a cobbled backlane, a Dalek wheeling about in circles waving it's arm things. I wish that I had imagined this, but I didn't. There were no cameras/vans/people, just a dalek casting a long shadow over wet cobbles...
 
Anton, have you heard of COG? If you haven't you should look him up. He is the most amazing robot (IMHO). He was built with the brains of a five year old child, but also with the capacity to learn much more. He is now pretty amazing, and advancing. With an old head, he learnt to focus his eyes perfectly on objects. The designers made him a different head, and he managed to focus it perfectly straight away. As robots go, this guy is amazing.

Sally, have you ever read Douglas Adams (The Hitch Hikers Guide)?

DH
 
COG, I've never heard about him. And what do you mean the brain of a 5 year old. As far as I know they don't judge their advances in robot technology to be more than the brain of a grasshopper so far. So with a brain of a 5 year old we wouldn't need to be discussing if we can do AI anymore.

That darn I keeps slipping.
 
This is related to the AI unit at MIT, tho if you are going to the website good luck, because its real slow to load :hmph:
 
Is it Kismet you mean? I don't understand why they don't get Muppet to build them a whole face for it.
 
Robots are being let loose in a colony of machines in an attempt to find out whether they can learn from their experiences.

The scientists behind this unusual experiment describe it as an evolutionary arms race for robots, with the machines struggling to collect energy.

The Living Robots experiment will be open to the public from 27 March at the Magna science adventure centre in Rotherham in England.

Visitors will be able to watch the real life Robot Wars in a purpose-built arena, designed to hold 500 people.

Hunting prey

For the experiment, the robots have been divided into predators and prey.

The prey robots are small grey metal creatures on wheels that get their energy by positioning their solar panels near sources of light.

The larger predator robots get their energy by locating and hunting down the prey to extract their battery power.

The robots all operate without any human intervention, designed to learn by themselves and evolve.

Scientists hope the experiment will reveal that these robots have the ability to use their accumulated experiences to enable them to
develop improved escape routines and more complex hunting strategies.

"You may find that the predators will go into packs and hunt in packs which will be the clever things to do," said Professor Noel Sharkey of Sheffield University.

"My own feeling is that they won't hunt in packs until they are very evolved and to begin with they actually will try to fight each other off to get at the prey."

Electronic genes

The ultimate aim is to build more intelligent robots for dangerous tasks like exploring distant planets, where machines might need to adapt to changing environmental conditions.

Professor Sharkey and his dedicated team at the Creative Robotics Unit at Magna spent the last 18 months developing the robots.

Both the predator and prey robots are controlled by neural networks that take input from their sensors and send output instructions to their drive motors. This is what enables and controls their behaviour.

Most of the sensing on the robots is done with their infrared sensors.

The machines can evolve by uploading their electronic genes to a remote computer.

The principle of survival of the fittest will apply as only robots which survive for a given length of time will be allowed to re-enter their electronic genes into the breeding pool.

(Source - the BBC website)
 
You can do this online - in a virtual world of course - at

http://www.techosphere.org.uk

Create your own robots and send them out into the virtual world to eat and reproduce, fight, hunt etc.
You just set them up and off they go - you get a report every now and then telling you how they are getting on - it's fabulous!

.....sorry.....I'll get my coat.......

:rolleyes: :)
 
Robot cameras will predict crimes before they happen

According to this item from The Independent.
 
Soccer Robotics

The BBC report on a World Cup for robots here .

'Running concurrently with the human World Cup, automatons will play in Japan in June in the annual Robocup tournament.

The event is officially described as "the robot world cup soccer tournament". Priscilla will take part in the first "humanoid league" to be held at the event. '

Never heard of this before.

P.S. Is anyone else having trouble with getting the forum to display properly? I seem to be getting a lot of mesages that just show a picture in the space for text - nothing else. Probably comes of being an slavish IE user. :(
 
Maybe I'm just soft, but I couldn't help thinking on another level with this one - WHY was it trying to escape? If it's thinking, does that mean it has free will? Does it mean it can determine between something it wants and something it doesn't want?
Could this lead to it not wanting to be in captivity, and hence seeking escape?
Or am I just reading way too much into this.

pinkle
 
'Thinking' in this case was the headline but really the robots learn from their experiences and mistakes.
As for free will it's an interesting thought and one which has been addressed in many films and books from (loosely) Fritz Laings Metropolis to Robocop.These bots have already learned the fight (if not fight/flight) lesson to get seviced afaik.
Personally i have a sneaking suspicion it was looking for a pub to watch England-Brazil :D
 
Of course, we don't know for sure that the robot was trying to escape from its evil overlords. For all we know it just got lost on the way to the recharge point.

There are, however, a number of worrying aspects to the article:

from The Age Online
The small unit, called Gaak,

Gaak? What kind of name is that? Do they want it to get picked on in Robot School?

Gaak made its bid for freedom yesterday after it had been taken out of the arena where hundreds of visitors watch the machines learning as they do daily battle for minor repairs

These robots are being forced to fight for their very survival as entertainment for crowds of oil-thirsty gawkers? Has the RSPCM* heard about this?
("Twenty quatloos on the newcomer...")

He later found it had travelled down an access slope, through the front door of the centre and was eventually discovered at the main entrance to the car park when a visitor nearly flattened it with his car.

Obviously the Yorkshire police need to start some kind of Robot Awareness training.

And he added: "But there's no need to worry, as although they can escape they are perfectly harmless and won't be taking over just yet."

Isn't that just what they want us to believe?

On a more serious note, it would be foolish to leap to the conclusion that these robots have actually developed sentience. We can only determine sentience in others by observing behaviour. We assume other humans are semtient, because we believe ourselves to be. Much easier than developing a system that is self-aware, is to develop one that looks like it is. Of course, then we are faced with the opposite problem, how do we prove that it isn't?


*Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Mechanoids.
 
Astronauts onboard the International Space Station are studying strange fluids that might one day flow in the veins of robots and help buildings resist earthquakes

Link Here
 
Cyber Christ

Well, not quite but here's the story from the BBC:

Robot insect walks on water

By Ivan Noble
BBC News Online science staff


Scientists have developed a robotic insect which walks on water.

The team, based at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the US, were testing out a theory about how one family of foraging insects performs the same trick.

Previous theories put forward to explain how water striders (Gerridae) manage to propel themselves across the surface of ponds and lakes had one major problem.

They predicted that young water striders should be too weak to move, while nature shows clearly that they are not.

Rowing and surface tension

Surface tension explains why water striders do not sink below the surface as they stand on water.

But a careful experimental study was needed to explain how they propel themselves forward.

"What we did was to apply some conventional techniques of flow visualisation in fluid dynamics," MIT's John Bush told BBC News Online.

"You basically sprinkle dye or tiny particles into the water and record what happens with a high-speed camera."

Dr Bush and his collaborators, David Hu and Brian Chan, discovered that the secret to the water strider's locomotion is that it rows across the water without penetrating the surface.

The rowing motion leaves a telltale vortex behind each foot, clearly visible on camera.

The robotic version of the water strider is bigger than its real-life counterpart and its motion less graceful, but it does seem to show that the MIT team has managed to capture the essence of a natural phenomenon.

Details of the research appear in the journal Nature.
==========================
 
Roboboffin

Researchers create first robot scientist

By Gareth Cook, Globe Staff, 1/15/2004

Researchers said yesterday that they have created the world's first robotic scientist, a system that can form theories, devise experiments, and then carry out the experiments almost entirely without human help.


The system, say its British creators, did just as well as biology graduate students in solving a problem in genetics, according to an article in today's issue of the journal Nature. Although the system uses robotic equipment common in modern laboratories, this is the first time that a machine has carried out so many of the roles traditionally done by scientists.

With technology becoming increasingly sophisticated, the announcement adds to a sprawling debate seen in fields as diverse as drug discovery and the exploration of Mars about what role humans will play in the future of scientific discovery.

In biology, as in many sciences, automation has given scientists powerful tools to find masses of information, but not the tools to make sense of it all, a problem the new system is aimed at helping to solve.

"In a number of areas scientific data is being generated at enormous rates, creating the need for the automated analysis of the data," said Ross D. King, the system's co-inventor and a professor at the University of Wales, Aberystwyth.

Though a robotic scientist may evoke images of a gleaming steel humanoid, clad perhaps in a starched white lab coat, the new invention is instead a modest collection of off-white boxes connected by wires in King's Welsh laboratory.

One computer acts as the brain, formulating experiments and interpreting the results, while other pieces of equipment carry out the experiments, drawing on a large library of materials.

Some scientists questioned whether the system, dubbed the "Robot Scientist" by its creators, deserved the title of scientist. For human scientists, some of the most interesting discoveries happen when researchers notice something they weren't looking for and suddenly change course, said Stuart Schreiber, a Harvard professor who is one of the intellectual leaders in automating aspects of modern biology. And breakthroughs often come when a scientist discards a basic assumption of the experiment. The Robot Scientist, on the other hand, is bound by the set of rules programmed into it.

"When Deep Blue recognizes a seemingly incomprehensible move by Kasparov, it doesn't have to consider that the rules of chess are incorrect," said Schreiber, comparing the system to IBM's chess-playing computer.

The Robot Scientist works in an area of biology known as functional genomics, which is concerned with uncovering the roles that different genes play in the machinery of life. As a test, the system was told to discover how certain genes affect a complex chemical pathway inside yeast cells. The task for the computer, and a common one in biology, was to figure out which genes are involved in which steps of the pathway by testing yeast cells with different genes removed.

The mind of the Robot Scientist is a piece of software, created by King with his colleagues in Manchester, London, and Aberdeen, which forms a hypothesis about which gene is involved in what step of the pathway and then devises an experiment to test the hypothesis.

This computer then sends these commands to a piece of robotic lab equipment, which can select all the appropriate ingredients, including a yeast cell with the appropriate gene removed. The robotic lab equipment can then observe the outcome of the experiment -- whether the yeast cell grows successfully -- and feed the information back to the Robot Scientist's main software, which decides whether the experiment vindicates the hypothesis and then selects a new experiment to learn more.

The Robot Scientist was able to determine the functions of the genes quickly and accurately, according to the paper. When a group of graduate students were asked to choose and design experiments with the same aim, only the best performers did as well as the robot, said King. Scientists who have seen the paper said that the system did not represent a major advance in either robotics or artificial intelligence, but rather a milestone in combining the two.

"I don't think it is a surprise that this is possible," said Gad Shaulsky, a Baylor College of Medicine genetics professor who was not involved in the research. "What is really wonderful about this is that they did it."

Pat Langley, a specialist in the use of artificial intelligence for scientific discovery at Stanford University, said that credit for the first robot scientist should go to a more modest experiment run by another researcher in 1990. That work is cited in today's paper, but King said that system used only very limited amounts of background knowledge, which restricted it to much simpler lab work, and was not able to consider multiple hypotheses -- a hallmark of the scientific process. Robots are already doing the work of scientists in a wide array of areas. Since the Apollo program, most space exploration has been done by robotic satellites that report back to human controllers. In biology, gene sequencing that once had to be done manually is now done by machines. And some mathematicians have even turned to computers to help them prove theorems, a development that some view as even more humiliating than a computer program beating a chess grand master.

The Robot Scientist isn't likely to be used in laboratories unless it becomes more sophisticated and cheaper to build, Shaulsky and others said, but it could be of interest to pharmaceutical companies, which do large amounts of automated research in their search for new drugs. Shaulsky said that he already uses an artificial intelligence software program, called "GenePath," to help design genetics experiments.

In the work reported in Nature, King and his colleagues used the Robot Scientist on genes whose function is already known, so they could be sure of their results. Now, though, they plan on using it to look at yeast genes that are not understood -- about 30 percent of the total. If that works, and the system discovers genuinely new information, it will earn the Robot Scientist a new level of respect from its warm-blooded colleagues, King predicted.

http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2004/01/15/researchers_create_first_robot_scientist/
 
Reminds me of the Alicebot and her insistance that I wasn't god or her father. She never managed to prove that either of my claims were false.
 
Dawn of the Robot Dogs

This is starting to really lead the way for robots. I think...

Check out this link:

http://xdesign.eng.yale.edu/feralrobots/

And check out this article that I got the above link from...

Robot Dogs Get Social Conscience Installed
By STEPHEN SINGER

NEW HAVEN, Conn. (AP) - They sniff, wag their tails, fetch and run in packs. Inside their plastic and metallic skins, robotic dogs programmed by engineering students at Yale University even have a social conscience.

The mechanical canines, equipped with just about everything but a wet nose, are wired to sniff out toxic materials at former landfills and radioactive sites, providing environmental information about parks, school yards and other public spaces.

The robots have spurred toxic search projects in the United States, Europe and Australia. They are the brainchild of Natalie Jeremijenko, a lecturer in engineering at Yale and self-described technoartist.

"Technology is a social actor," she said. "These dogs are programmed into instruments for social activism. It's technological politics in another form."

The dogs were originally designed, manufactured and marketed commercially as toys by Sony Electronics Inc., Mattel Inc. (MAT) and other companies.

Sony's AIBO, which has been on the market since 1999 and sells for $1,599, is intended to draw emotional responses from its masters, said Jon Piazza, a spokesman for Sony robotics entertainment in New York. The dogs' software platform is available on the company's Web site and may be used for other purposes, he said.

For example, a competition has drawn 20 universities with programmed robotic toys that participate in a "Robo Cup," he said.

The Yale project is different.

"I think that's a surprise," Piazza said.

Jeremijenko, a mechanical engineer and computer scientist, designed the robotic dogs 18 months ago as a spinoff from a research project she began in the late 1990s that she calls an Interaction Triggered System. Its intent was to see how people interact with technology.

Distribution and cost are two major advantages of transforming the dogs into community activists. The toys are easily available, and gutting them for a university engineering project is the least expensive way to teach robotics, she said.

And dogs - the real ones - are a good model for robots because they're companion animals and "can sense things we can't sense," Jeremijenko said.

Robotic technology is hardly new. It's increasingly being applied to repetitive factory tasks or dangerous work such as defusing bombs or finding victims in collapsed buildings.

Advances in microtechnology lead to ever-smaller sensors as engineers and scientists seek new uses.

For Jeremijenko, it's the feral dog project - so named, she says, because feral dogs are street-smart and wily.

The dogs'"brains" are upgraded and their "noses" programmed to pick up the scent of common volatile organic compounds - such as paint thinners or dry cleaning fluids - or more dangerous toxins. They also are built to navigate a variety of terrains.

In addition, cameras are placed in the dogs' hindquarters to allow researchers to observe their interaction with handlers.

The dogs also are wired to move in packs. To collect samples from a larger area more effectively, the pack is programmed to follow the dog with the strongest sensor reading.

The result is the collection of data from a broad area with time-specific samples and extensive mapping of the area being surveyed.

The robotic dogs have been assigned to work at several sites, often with youngsters who are fascinated by the machines and, Jeremijenko hopes, learn from the experience.

Of 12 robotic dogs wired at Yale, several have been put to work at Hamden, where tests have found arsenic, lead and other pollutants in soil beneath a school and nearby homes. Four canine robots also have been sniffing around a park on former Consolidated Edison property along the Bronx River in New York.

Jeremijenko's project has spawned an Internet presence, inspiring others to sic robotic dogs on sites in Belarus that were in the path of radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl nuclear plant, on sites in Australia used for atomic testing in the 1950s, and on radioactive waste sites in Idaho.

The dogs are available "wherever there's a site of community interest and kids are interested in robotics," Jeremijenko said.

They also advance her teaching philosophy.

"It's part of a larger shift in education: how to apply your knowledge to local problems," Jeremijenko said. "It's extremely important that engineers understand the social implications of their designs."

She also has a practical concern.

"Anyone who wants to dump a robotic dog, bring them here," Jeremijenko said of her lab at Yale. "Call this the robotic dog pound."



Article Came From Here
 
I quite like those Sony dogs. If I could find an excuse for buying one as a legitimate company expense then I probably would.

But lets face facts. A Sony cat would be a far more subtle and interesting software and mechanical engineering triumph.

A properly functioning dog has fairly predicatble behaviour IMO. Almost the reverse is true of cats.

I like cats and dogs.
 
The car's on its own in this desert dash

From a stripped down humvee with radar and GPS to a motorbike called Ghostrider kept upright by a gyroscope, the US military aims to kick-start robot vehicle research.

Ian Sample
Thursday March 4, 2004
The Guardian

It could be the most extraordinary race ever held. Next week, a hotch-potch of off-road cars, trucks, golf carts and maybe even the odd motorbike will battle it out in a mad dash across the hazardous terrain of the Mojave desert. The incentive is simple: the first to cross the finishing line within 10 hours wins
The car's on its own in this desert dash

From a stripped down humvee with radar and GPS to a motorbike called Ghostrider kept upright by a gyroscope, the US military aims to kick-start robot vehicle research.

Ian Sample
Thursday March 4, 2004
The Guardian

It could be the most extraordinary race ever held. Next week, a hotch-potch of off-road cars, trucks, golf carts and maybe even the odd motorbike will battle it out in a mad dash across the hazardous terrain of the Mojave desert. The incentive is simple: the first to cross the finishing line within 10 hours wins $1m (£536,000). But there's a catch: none of the vehicles will have a driver.
It may resemble a real life version of the Wacky Races, but there's a serious point to the race of the machines. Dreamed up by the Pentagon's defence advanced research projects agency (Darpa), the Grand Challenge, as the competition is known, is seen as a way to kick-start research into unmanned vehicles. The US military believes that robotic vehicles capable of finding their way from A to B using only onboard sensors and computers, could one day be sent into battle, to ferry supplies and carry out reconnaissance. Congress expects as much, requesting that by 2015 one-third of all army ground vehicles be unmanned.

Darpa doesn't usually opt for such wacky measures to develop the military technology of tomorrow. But concerned at the lack of headway being made by the usual defence contractors, the agency decided to lay down the gauntlet to all US citizensin the hope of attracting fresh thinking. Out of 86 teams to apply, about 20 will turn up for a qualifying round this Sunday at the speedway track in Fontana, California. Once there, the teams must demonstrate that their vehicles can get around without human intervention, avoiding obstacles as they go. Those that succeed will then be eligible to enter the race proper, a week on Saturday.

Darpa is keeping details of the race route secret for now. All they have disclosed is that it will be largely off-road, beginning in Barstow, California, and finishing some 200 or so miles away in the town of Primm, just across the Nevada border. On the way, the robotic vehicles can expect to encounter mountains and gulleys, cliffs and ditches, hairpins and boulders. As if the natural hazards won't be tough enough, Darpa has some obstacles of its own it will scatter along the course. "It's a difficult challenge. There are so many things that could happen," says Scott Gray, spokesman for Carnegie Mellon University's Red team.

Final details of the race course will be given to each team on a CD just 2 hours before the race starts. The CD will contain GPS coordinates of about 1,000 waypoints defining the course. To avoid disqualification, each vehicle in the race must not only hit each waypoint, but stay within set "corridors" between them. Vehicles that stray off course will immediately be shut down by chase cars following close behind or by helicopters watching the race from above.

The contest has attracted teams whose members range from school children and garden-shed robot enthusiasts to off-road racers and engineers at the country's top robotics institutes. The Red team at Carnegie Mellon's Robotics Institute is one of the most experienced, and arguably favourite to win. Led by William "Red" Whittaker, who has previously sent robots into Three Mile island and Chernobyl, the team have stripped down a surplus US military humvee and kitted it out with stereo cameras, radar, laser scanners and GPS receivers. Onboard computers will hold in their memory satellite images of the local terrain, which the vehicle can use with GPS data to work out if it is close to hidden dangers, such as a cliff over the brow of a hill it is hurtling up. The radar and laser scanners will pick up any obstacles, such as boulders or other vehicles, in the way.

Darpa has expressly forbidden the use of Wacky Races tactics that might scupper the chances of the other contestants. The robotic vehicles are not allowed to carry weapons and must tackle obstacles by going round them, rather than squashing them or batting them out of the way.

In tests, the Red team's vehicle, Sandstorm, has reached speeds in excess of 70mph. "We like to think we've got a good chance of winning. We've certainly put in the work to make it successful," says Gray. "But you never know what will happen. It could rain, which might short-circuit the electronics. Or a vehicle right next to us could go off course and bump us out," he added.

At the University of California, Berkeley, Anthony Levandowski and his team are taking a completely different approach to the Grand Challenge. Instead of taking the easy route and modifying a car, they are entering a motorbike. "We thought about what is the best way to get across rough terrain, and the answer is a motorbike," says Levandowski. "The only problem is motorbikes have this big problem in that they just won't stand up by themselves."

The team have spent the best part of a year developing gyroscopes and other technologies for keeping the bike upright. It works, but only just. The eery result, a bike with no rider, has aptly been named Ghostrider.

Levandowski admits his team have made life tough for themselves, but says their plan was always to try something nobody else would consider. "If we fail, at least we tried to do something innovative, something that's never been done before."

The remaining entries are mostly converted army vehicles or four-wheel drive cars, with the exception of TerraMax, a giant six-wheeler built by a team at Ohio State University.

As the teams work around the clock to get their contraptions ready to race, final preparations are taking place along the race track too. While Darpa officials add more obstacles to the course, a team of biologists have been dispatched to "sweep" the route for endangered desert tortoises that might get squished on race day. Any likely looking burrows are being penned in for the day to stop the tortoises wandering out into the mayhem.

Despite the effort that has been put into getting the different vehicles ready in time, many engineers secretly admit they don't fancy their chances of finishing the course, let alone winning. One engineer was convinced at least one car would meet its fate at the bottom of a cliff. "Let's just hope the video cameras are running when that happens," he says.
m (£536,000). But there's a catch: none of the vehicles will have a driver.
It may resemble a real life version of the Wacky Races, but there's a serious point to the race of the machines. Dreamed up by the Pentagon's defence advanced research projects agency (Darpa), the Grand Challenge, as the competition is known, is seen as a way to kick-start research into unmanned vehicles. The US military believes that robotic vehicles capable of finding their way from A to B using only onboard sensors and computers, could one day be sent into battle, to ferry supplies and carry out reconnaissance. Congress expects as much, requesting that by 2015 one-third of all army ground vehicles be unmanned.

Darpa doesn't usually opt for such wacky measures to develop the military technology of tomorrow. But concerned at the lack of headway being made by the usual defence contractors, the agency decided to lay down the gauntlet to all US citizensin the hope of attracting fresh thinking. Out of 86 teams to apply, about 20 will turn up for a qualifying round this Sunday at the speedway track in Fontana, California. Once there, the teams must demonstrate that their vehicles can get around without human intervention, avoiding obstacles as they go. Those that succeed will then be eligible to enter the race proper, a week on Saturday.

Darpa is keeping details of the race route secret for now. All they have disclosed is that it will be largely off-road, beginning in Barstow, California, and finishing some 200 or so miles away in the town of Primm, just across the Nevada border. On the way, the robotic vehicles can expect to encounter mountains and gulleys, cliffs and ditches, hairpins and boulders. As if the natural hazards won't be tough enough, Darpa has some obstacles of its own it will scatter along the course. "It's a difficult challenge. There are so many things that could happen," says Scott Gray, spokesman for Carnegie Mellon University's Red team.

Final details of the race course will be given to each team on a CD just 2 hours before the race starts. The CD will contain GPS coordinates of about 1,000 waypoints defining the course. To avoid disqualification, each vehicle in the race must not only hit each waypoint, but stay within set "corridors" between them. Vehicles that stray off course will immediately be shut down by chase cars following close behind or by helicopters watching the race from above.

The contest has attracted teams whose members range from school children and garden-shed robot enthusiasts to off-road racers and engineers at the country's top robotics institutes. The Red team at Carnegie Mellon's Robotics Institute is one of the most experienced, and arguably favourite to win. Led by William "Red" Whittaker, who has previously sent robots into Three Mile island and Chernobyl, the team have stripped down a surplus US military humvee and kitted it out with stereo cameras, radar, laser scanners and GPS receivers. Onboard computers will hold in their memory satellite images of the local terrain, which the vehicle can use with GPS data to work out if it is close to hidden dangers, such as a cliff over the brow of a hill it is hurtling up. The radar and laser scanners will pick up any obstacles, such as boulders or other vehicles, in the way.

Darpa has expressly forbidden the use of Wacky Races tactics that might scupper the chances of the other contestants. The robotic vehicles are not allowed to carry weapons and must tackle obstacles by going round them, rather than squashing them or batting them out of the way.

In tests, the Red team's vehicle, Sandstorm, has reached speeds in excess of 70mph. "We like to think we've got a good chance of winning. We've certainly put in the work to make it successful," says Gray. "But you never know what will happen. It could rain, which might short-circuit the electronics. Or a vehicle right next to us could go off course and bump us out," he added.

At the University of California, Berkeley, Anthony Levandowski and his team are taking a completely different approach to the Grand Challenge. Instead of taking the easy route and modifying a car, they are entering a motorbike. "We thought about what is the best way to get across rough terrain, and the answer is a motorbike," says Levandowski. "The only problem is motorbikes have this big problem in that they just won't stand up by themselves."

The team have spent the best part of a year developing gyroscopes and other technologies for keeping the bike upright. It works, but only just. The eery result, a bike with no rider, has aptly been named Ghostrider.

Levandowski admits his team have made life tough for themselves, but says their plan was always to try something nobody else would consider. "If we fail, at least we tried to do something innovative, something that's never been done before."

The remaining entries are mostly converted army vehicles or four-wheel drive cars, with the exception of TerraMax, a giant six-wheeler built by a team at Ohio State University.

As the teams work around the clock to get their contraptions ready to race, final preparations are taking place along the race track too. While Darpa officials add more obstacles to the course, a team of biologists have been dispatched to "sweep" the route for endangered desert tortoises that might get squished on race day. Any likely looking burrows are being penned in for the day to stop the tortoises wandering out into the mayhem.

Despite the effort that has been put into getting the different vehicles ready in time, many engineers secretly admit they don't fancy their chances of finishing the course, let alone winning. One engineer was convinced at least one car would meet its fate at the bottom of a cliff. "Let's just hope the video cameras are running when that happens," he says.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/feature/story/0,13026,1161125,00.html
 
now thats the first step to terminator (tm)




send in the robots from robot wars :yeay: :D
 
Robo-translators

Robo-talk helps pocket translator

By Jo Twist
BBC News Online technology reporter

Small robots with friendly faces have helped out in the development of handheld translation gadgets to be tried out by travellers in Japan.

Visitors landing at Tokyo's Narita Airport will be able to hire a device which can translate the local lingo.

The speech-to-speech technology was developed by NEC, tested in Papero robots and then put in PDAs.

Papero is the first all-hearing, all-seeing robot to be able to talk in conversational colloquialisms.

The PDA hire scheme is part of a wider project, e-Airport, to make Japan's main international airport the most hi-tech in the world.

Lend me your brain?

As well as being able to understand and imitate human behaviour, Papero (Partner-Type Personal Robot), is the first robot to translate verbally between two languages in colloquial tongue.

It can cope, in other words, with slang and local chatter, and has a vocabulary of 50,000 Japanese and 25,000 English travel and tourism related words.

After Papero demonstrated its translation ability, the PDAs borrowed its brain and tongue. Users can talk into the device and it will talk back in almost-perfect Japanese in a second.

It has voice recognition, digital voice translation and a voice synthesiser to talk to users, explained Chris Shimizu, NEC's corporate relations manager, and the quality of the voice spoken back to users is much more human than robotic.

The devices also serve as mobile phones, and have airport and local guides, as well as unlimited wireless net access.

Local challenges

The development of this accurate speech-to-speech technology has been a result of joint research efforts from NEC in Japan and in Europe.

"The accuracy is dependent on the size and quality of the dictionary on the handset or PDA but is usually very close to 100% accurate," Mr Shimizu told BBC News Online.

Years have been spent developing the technology to cope with the challenge of understanding different speech patterns, accents and colloquialisms.

"The technology can pick these up straight away because of its understanding of linguistic inference.

"Also, it doesn't require a user to pre-register their voice."

Developments in the quality and accuracy of speech-to-speech, high speed translation technology could find its way into mobile phones soon too.

"Most certainly, it is absolutely ideal and it is most likely this technology will be utilised," said Mr Shimizu.

Business travellers and tourists can try out the PDAs before the scheme is offered commercially in other airports and tourist centres at the end of 2004.

Papero has been sent back to continue its old job as a personal companion to family members in Japanese homes.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/technology/3513623.stm

Published: 2004/03/04 09:15:06 GMT

© BBC MMIV
 
melf: Its heading that way isn't it :(

Another report:

ROBOT RACE: A GIANT LEAP FOR UNMANNED KIND

Bizarre race part of Pentagon's plan to reduce number of humans on battlefields


Rene Sanchez
The Washington Post

March 11, 2004

FONTANA, Calif. -- The last time Jim Radford and his friends took their bizarrely customized pickup truck out for a late-night test drive, police cars swarmed them.

"They had never seen anything like it," Radford said. "They thought we were terrorists."

He gave them the far-fetched facts: No, officers, we're computer scientists and engineers. Training for a road race the world has never seen. Just ask the Pentagon.

The explanation kept them out of trouble. And now he and his crew are here at the California Speedway, making frantic final preparations for a strange showdown against other high-tech teams in the Mojave Desert on Saturday that could one day revolutionize warfare.

It will be a race across nearly 200 miles of rugged terrain, featuring robotic vehicles in all shapes and sizes that have been built and programmed to drive a predetermined course through difficult and sometimes unexpected conditions entirely on their own.

No humans behind the wheel, no navigators using remote control.

"We're all trying to do what they say can't be done," said Scott Wilson, captain of a university team from southwest Louisiana that has named its entry CajunBot.

The winner of the race, if there is one, will collect a
ROBOT RACE: A GIANT LEAP FOR UNMANNED KIND

Bizarre race part of Pentagon's plan to reduce number of humans on battlefields


Rene Sanchez
The Washington Post

March 11, 2004

FONTANA, Calif. -- The last time Jim Radford and his friends took their bizarrely customized pickup truck out for a late-night test drive, police cars swarmed them.

"They had never seen anything like it," Radford said. "They thought we were terrorists."

He gave them the far-fetched facts: No, officers, we're computer scientists and engineers. Training for a road race the world has never seen. Just ask the Pentagon.

The explanation kept them out of trouble. And now he and his crew are here at the California Speedway, making frantic final preparations for a strange showdown against other high-tech teams in the Mojave Desert on Saturday that could one day revolutionize warfare.

It will be a race across nearly 200 miles of rugged terrain, featuring robotic vehicles in all shapes and sizes that have been built and programmed to drive a predetermined course through difficult and sometimes unexpected conditions entirely on their own.

No humans behind the wheel, no navigators using remote control.

"We're all trying to do what they say can't be done," said Scott Wilson, captain of a university team from southwest Louisiana that has named its entry CajunBot.

The winner of the race, if there is one, will collect a $1 million prize courtesy of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. DARPA is likening the event to a 1927 competition in which aviation enthusiasts were dared to design a plane capable of making a transatlantic flight, for a $25,000 prize. A guy named Lindbergh won that one.

For military researchers, the contest is no joke. Congress wants one-third of ground vehicles used in combat to be autonomous by 2015, to keep more troops out of danger. But so far, defense contractors have not had success replicating the kind of technology that has led, for example, to the deployment of unmanned planes over Iraqi battlefields.

Anthony Tether, the director of the Pentagon agency, decided to issue a nationwide challenge in the hope that "a person in a garage someplace" would tinker his or her way to a technological breakthrough.

"This is extraordinarily important to the national security of the United States," Tether said here Monday. "This technology will save American lives."

He said he foresees a day when unmanned ground vehicles in a war zone will deliver supplies over long distances to troops without putting support personnel at risk. "Jessica Lynch comes to mind," Tether said, referring to the celebrated Army private wounded and captured when the convoy of maintenance vehicles in which she was riding was ambushed last spring shortly after U.S. forces invaded Iraq. She was later rescued, but 11 soldiers in her company were killed during the ambush.

The lineup for Saturday's race is not yet set. About 25 teams from across the country are spending the week putting their vehicles through qualifying trials on the infield of the California Speedway, which has been transformed into an obstacle course of grassy slopes, muddy ditches, rocky paths and abandoned cars.

The finalists, selected from an initial field of more than 100 teams, have come from colleges, engineering and computer companies, even a Southern California high school. Some of the teams include leaders in the fields of computer science and robotics. Others are a collection of weekend hobbyists with big dreams.

All of them have been working almost round the clock for months building and tweaking head-turning vehicles loaded with laptops and laser sensors, with video cameras, thick jumbles of computer cables, mapping data and Global Positioning System receivers.

No two vehicles look alike. Some resemble dune buggies, golf carts or the Mars rover. Others are wildly redesigned trucks and sport-utility vehicles. They have such names as Ghost Rider, Ladibug and Bob.

On Saturday, just a few hours before the race begins, the entrants will receive a CD-ROM with global positioning coordinates outlining the course they will program into their vehicles.

Most face long odds getting across the desert. "I would bet my life savings that no one completes this race," said Bill Zimmerly, a software specialist from Missouri, whose entry is a revamped Kawasaki all-terrain vehicle. "Think about it. Our brains are 1,000 times better than a computer, and it takes us about 16 years to learn how to drive a car. To get a vehicle to make all the same decisions we do when we drive is extremely difficult. We're all still early in the process of figuring this out."
million prize courtesy of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. DARPA is likening the event to a 1927 competition in which aviation enthusiasts were dared to design a plane capable of making a transatlantic flight, for a ,000 prize. A guy named Lindbergh won that one.

For military researchers, the contest is no joke. Congress wants one-third of ground vehicles used in combat to be autonomous by 2015, to keep more troops out of danger. But so far, defense contractors have not had success replicating the kind of technology that has led, for example, to the deployment of unmanned planes over Iraqi battlefields.

Anthony Tether, the director of the Pentagon agency, decided to issue a nationwide challenge in the hope that "a person in a garage someplace" would tinker his or her way to a technological breakthrough.

"This is extraordinarily important to the national security of the United States," Tether said here Monday. "This technology will save American lives."

He said he foresees a day when unmanned ground vehicles in a war zone will deliver supplies over long distances to troops without putting support personnel at risk. "Jessica Lynch comes to mind," Tether said, referring to the celebrated Army private wounded and captured when the convoy of maintenance vehicles in which she was riding was ambushed last spring shortly after U.S. forces invaded Iraq. She was later rescued, but 11 soldiers in her company were killed during the ambush.

The lineup for Saturday's race is not yet set. About 25 teams from across the country are spending the week putting their vehicles through qualifying trials on the infield of the California Speedway, which has been transformed into an obstacle course of grassy slopes, muddy ditches, rocky paths and abandoned cars.

The finalists, selected from an initial field of more than 100 teams, have come from colleges, engineering and computer companies, even a Southern California high school. Some of the teams include leaders in the fields of computer science and robotics. Others are a collection of weekend hobbyists with big dreams.

All of them have been working almost round the clock for months building and tweaking head-turning vehicles loaded with laptops and laser sensors, with video cameras, thick jumbles of computer cables, mapping data and Global Positioning System receivers.

No two vehicles look alike. Some resemble dune buggies, golf carts or the Mars rover. Others are wildly redesigned trucks and sport-utility vehicles. They have such names as Ghost Rider, Ladibug and Bob.

On Saturday, just a few hours before the race begins, the entrants will receive a CD-ROM with global positioning coordinates outlining the course they will program into their vehicles.

Most face long odds getting across the desert. "I would bet my life savings that no one completes this race," said Bill Zimmerly, a software specialist from Missouri, whose entry is a revamped Kawasaki all-terrain vehicle. "Think about it. Our brains are 1,000 times better than a computer, and it takes us about 16 years to learn how to drive a car. To get a vehicle to make all the same decisions we do when we drive is extremely difficult. We're all still early in the process of figuring this out."

http://www.thesunlink.com/redesign/2004-03-11/nationworld/422082.shtml

I am looking forward to seeing how things go - I suspect most of them will be embarassing failures but there might be some very interesting outcomes.

~goes and fetches some popcorn~

Emps
 
Robot Racers Catch a Break By Noah Shachtman

Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,62608,00.html

09:54 AM Mar. 10, 2004 PT

The rules were simple: If drone makers wanted to compete in the Pentagon's million-dollar, robotic, off-road rally, they had to make sure their creations could navigate a mile-long obstacle course first. The test was needed, Defense Department officials repeatedly said, to make sure the bots had a prayer of completing this Saturday's 210-mile journey across the Mojave Desert.

But when the qualifying rounds began Monday for this Grand Challenge, run by the Pentagon research arm Darpa, it quickly became clear (PDF) that only a handful of the bots could pass the exam on the opening day. The array of slight ditches and wide passages set up at the California Speedway were just too much for the drones.


So Darpa has rewritten the rule book (PDF), at least a little. Before, teams had to clear a "required demonstration of intelligent autonomous behavior and safety features around a short demonstration course." Now, it looks like just about any robot car will be on the starting line in the desert town of Barstow, California.

The semi-autonomous Acura MDX, put together by the students at Palos Verdes High School, managed only about 50 yards during its first qualifying heat.

"The principal was in the stands," explained Greg Larson, a Palos Verdes parent who's helping to supervise the team. "And it veered and headed right toward the principal before it hit a wall. It was like something out of Animal House."

Nevertheless, the kids would be "going to Barstow," Darpa director Tony Tether announced Tuesday at the DarpaTech conference in Anaheim. So is the team from UC Berkeley, which admitted in their literature that the farthest their unmanned bike had traveled during testing was 150 feet. The squads from Caltech and Ohio State University were also allowed in, even though their drones did not complete the obstacle course.

The only bot to complete the course so far is Sandstorm, the so-called "headless Humvee" from Carnegie Mellon University. The multimillion-dollar drone was the odds-on favorite to win the race -- or at least last the longest in the Mojave.

MSNBC reports that "There is also a growing sentiment that Saturday's course through the Mojave Desert ... may run closer to 150 miles than to the previously stated 210 or 300 miles."

At the Anaheim conference, Tether seemed unconcerned that the Grand Challenge guidelines had shifted.

After all, the race course is likely beyond the means of any drone to handle. So the California Speedway trials, he said, "are more for safety purposes."
 
Robocop

Time is GMT + 8 hours
Posted: 10 March 2004 1005 hrs

Locally-built robot set to become Hong Kong's latest cop

By Channel NewsAsia's Hong Kong Correspondent Melissa Hyak



HONG KONG: There is a new cop on the block in Hong Kong, all set to teach the public how to combat crime.

But the man in blue stands out for being the first of his kind in the territory - he is actually a robot.

After two predecessors from the US, Robotcop The Third is "born-and-bred", so to speak, in Hong Kong.

He was conceptualised and built by the best researchers at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

But his key features actually came from several students who won a Robotcop design competition.

"My design is to have a plasma hidden in the centre (of the robot), and then have it open up. I think the effect's better that way than the older ones, as if we're revealing a secret," said student Tseng Chung Hung.

Fellow student Lai Kai Yee meanwhile recalled: "I wanted to make the robot's arms more life-like, since it is supposed to be a police officer."

And the cop can indeed move freely with the help of infrared sensors.

It is also highly interactive - thanks to an advanced digital system and wireless technology.

It also outshines its predecessors with its safety features.

Unlike its Hollywood counterpart, there is not a single violent bolt in this Robotcop.

It might cost around HK0,000 to develop and build, but the service it provides the Hong Kong crime prevention drive is priceless.

Like its predecessors, its main role is to spread anti-theft and anti-triad messages.

Since it was first introduced in Hong Kong in 1988, the previous two Robotcops, both American imports, have taught 800,000 school children how to fight crime.

But the cost of engaging "foreign talent" was escalating.

So the police decided to go local, which they believe, will be even more effective.

"We wanted to have a Robotcop that's developed and made with Hong Kong technology. We believe there's a stronger sense of rapport and connectedness because of it," said Sidney Chau, Senior Assistant Commissioner of Police and Director of Crime & Security.

The latest Robotcop is also a great way to promote home-grown technology.

Professor David Young, Director, Applied Technology Centre, Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, said: "We had a hope, that with this Robotcop, we could show that Hong Kong's technology is world class. That we can also produce a world class robot.

"And we hope too, to inspire the young in Hong Kong, that they too can one day produce such technology, to be part of the world of science."

Slowing the crime rate and sparking the interest of a whole new breed of scientists - surely heavy responsbilities for this latest addition to the Hong Kong population.

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/technologynews/view/74703/1/.html
 
Toyota Motor Corporation's new humanoid walking robot plays the trumpet as it makes a debut before reporters in Tokyo March 11, 2004. Toyota announced on Thursday a project overview to develop partner robots functioning as personal assistants for humans, using their experience in automotive development and production engineering. The 120cm, 35-kg robot has artificial lips moving with the same finesse as human lips, enabling the playing of the trumpet, together with mobility control technology, and is to be exhibited at the Expo 2005 in Aichi, Japan.

Reuters Search for Robot - Can't get a clean link so you'll have to open the link from this page with your pop-up killer off.

According to The Metro newpaper, the builders of this robot 'plan to create an entire robot band'.

Am I the only one who gets reminded of Dr Phibes and his clockwork orchestra?
 
Back
Top