• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Rupert Murdoch Controls The World

This might be a bit lame, as I can't find any links or anything. Oh Well :?

I caught about 5 mins of news yesterday morning before rushing for the bus, and the topic was the sacking of Andy Grey. Someone pointed out that...he is one of the 'celebs' that have requested info regarding the phone hacking thingy, a news paper owned by Murdoch, and works on Sky, also owned by Murdoch. They wondered if he might have been sacked very quickly as he is not toeing the company line.

Now it was early ish, I was ironing with lots of steam and my alarm was going off, my coffee was too hot and the hair straighteners weren't heating up INSTANTLY!, so I was a little distracted. But last night and today, I haven't been able to track down anything regarding this. It may well have been airy speculation by some guest or other. It was on the BBC Breakfast show, about 7:50, as I was hoping to catch the local news before I left.

Equally, I could have dreamed something similar and just caught some key words that translated in my subconscious to this. It has been known, but that's a tale for another day. Does anyone have any extra bits to fill in the blanks on this?
 
Yes, Gray is already in the process of suing the News of the World for hacking his phone.
 
Makes you wonder if any other Murdoch papers are involved...

The police are reopening the investigation, by the way.
 
Landlady 1, Sky Sports 0 – the legal victory that has Murdoch worried
By Ian Burrell, Media Editor
Friday, 4 February 2011

A determined landlady has won a significant breakthrough in a legal battle that could transform the British pub trade by allowing premises to show Premier League games that are being broadcast by foreign networks.

Karen Murphy, who runs the Red, White and Blue pub in Portsmouth, is fighting a criminal and civil action brought against her after she began screening matches from the Greek broadcaster Nova, using a much cheaper decoder.

Yesterday, in a landmark case called "Murphy's Law", Julie Kokott, Advocate General at the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg, found that she had the right to show the matches, advising the EU's highest court to rule in favour of renegade landlords. The advice could cause a revolution in the way media sports rights are sold across the continent, and is sure to be the target of furious lobbying by the Premier League and by Rupert Murdoch's BSkyB ahead of a final decision this year.

Ms Murphy is in a bitter legal dispute with the Premier League which has lucrative exclusive deals, primarily with BSkyB but also with ESPN. For four years she has been fighting to overturn a criminal conviction for breach of the Premier League's copyright. She was fined £8,000 but has taken the case to the High Court on appeal.

Legal experts said the finding could create serious problems for BSkyB, which Mr Murdoch's News Corp is seeking to buy outright, and the funding of Premier League clubs. Robert Vidal, head of EU, competition and trade at lawyers Taylor Wessing LLP, said: "[Mr] Murdoch has always been a cheerleader for the free market; however, on this occasion I doubt he will welcome the introduction of cross-border competition and the resulting drop in turnover and margins as Sky customers migrate to cheaper providers."

The investment bank Jefferies believes that BSkyB makes about £200m a year from selling subscriptions to British pubs and other commercial premises. Paul Charity, editor of the Morning Advertiser, the magazine for the pub trade, said: "Anything that would mean licencees pay less would be welcome. The opinion has come as a bit of a shock to the pub trade because they thought that the copyright case was clearly in favour of Sky."

Ms Murphy's lawyer, Paul Dixon, said: "For the independent [pub] trade this gives them freedom to go out and buy television systems from broadcasters from any EU member state."

etc...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media ... 03842.html
 
rynner2 said:
... Robert Vidal, head of EU, competition and trade at lawyers Taylor Wessing LLP, said: "[Mr] Murdoch has always been a cheerleader for the free market; however, on this occasion I doubt he will welcome the introduction of cross-border competition and the resulting drop in turnover and margins as Sky customers migrate to cheaper providers."

...

etc...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media ... 03842.html
Proving, once again, that 'Free Markets' are only a good idea, if you are the one who controls them.
 
Full story:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-12974401

Phone-hacking inquiry: Two journalists arrested

A News of the World reporter and an ex-news editor have been arrested by police investigating allegations of phone hacking, the BBC understands.

Chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck, 50, and former news editor Ian Edmondson, 42, are suspected of having unlawfully intercepted voicemail messages.

The men voluntarily attended two London police stations and were later released on bail until September.

The News of the World's owner said it was co-operating "fully" with police.

Scotland Yard said the arrested pair, who they have not identified, were also held on suspicion of conspiring to intercept communications...

Told you it wouldn't go away. We await further developments.
 
And here we are:
Full story:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13014161

News of the World apologises for phone hacking scandal

The News of the World's owner has said sorry over the phone hacking scandal and is to set up a compensation fund.

News International says, in some cases, it will apologise and admit liability. The BBC understands it hopes to pay out less than £20m in total to victims including actress Sienna Miller.

A lawyer for some alleged victims said it was a "step in the right direction".

A News of the World reporter and an ex-news editor were arrested and bailed earlier this week over the allegations.

The BBC's business editor Robert Peston called it an "absolutely dramatic development" and said the company believed most claims would be settled for less than £100,000 each.

There are 24 active cases and they include claims of breach of privacy brought by the film star Sienna Miller, former culture secretary Tessa Jowell, football commentator Andy Gray and the designer Kelly Hoppen.

News International, which also owns the Times and Sun newspapers, said it had asked its lawyers to "establish a compensation scheme with a view to dealing with justifiable claims fairly and efficiently".

"Past behaviour at the News of the World in relation to voicemail interception is a matter of genuine regret," it said in a statement.

"It is now apparent that our previous inquiries failed to uncover important evidence and we acknowledge our actions were not sufficiently robust."

News International, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch, said it would continue to co-operate with the Metropolitan Police inquiry...

That's how you expose a conspiracy. It's not over yet, though, now NI have admitted their illegal actions we'll have to see how many heads roll and what the police investigation brings up. Mind you, they can probably quite afford twenty million quid.
 
Excellent article by Henry Porter: I'm pleased to see he's writing decent stuff again instead of shilling for the Coalition:

Can it be that Rupert Murdoch really is above the law now?

Rupert Murdoch's influence is so strong that even in parliament the phone-hacking scandal has been barely talked about


In the sum of human misery, goes the argument I listened to with Buddhist forbearance last week, phone hacking does not rate very high. This is the starving millions defence, a familiar technique used to divert attention from any issue that is uncomfortable to a particular elite. MPs' expenses? Compared to global warming, old son, it hardly seems worth mentioning.

Although it is transparently self-serving, the gambit works well because in a world full of bewilderingly novel anguish, most of us try to prioritise our concerns: we are susceptible to suggestions that the phone-hacking scandal is navel gazing by the media; a chattering classes obsession; a Westminster village row.

But let me just say that this story, now given fresh momentum by last week's allegations that the News of the World and other newspapers, such as the Daily Mirror, used a convicted blackmailer to hack and steal the confidential data of, among others, Tony Blair, Kate Middleton, Jack Straw, Peter Mandelson, Lord Stevens, Alastair Campbell, Eddie George and Mervyn King, is a scandal of monumental proportions, which, were it not for the awkward fact that newspapers are swimming in their own filth, would be on every front page, instead of on those of a few liberal publications.

Newspapers still run the conversation in Britain. TV and radio can have an impact but rarely when Murdoch is concerned. For instance, you would have thought BBC news might welcome the opportunity again to draw attention to Murdoch's embarrassment, as well as to the behaviour of other titles that have been tormenting the corporation for decades, but the reality is that since John Birt's regime and the fallout from the David Kelly affair, the BBC behaves like a court eunuch. In days gone by, it would have forged ahead, but in 2011 its journalists wait for the Guardian's Nick Davies to publish a story or MP Tom Watson to use parliamentary privilege. At the moment, my marrows grow faster than the BBC reacts to this kind of news.

So the conversation is shut down and now a kind of chill extends to Parliament, where just a handful of legislators on the opposition benches, notably Watson, Lord Prescott, Chris Bryant and Paul Farrelly, continues to point to the elephant in the room, eyes popping with disbelief. The coalition benches are silent; ministers murmur about the reality of living with Murdoch and the Daily Mail, while the prime minister simply refers people such as Watson, who brought the new allegations to light at prime minister's questions last week, to the ongoing police investigation, Operation Weeting.

This line of leaving the police to get on with their job without political interference is no more credible than the starving millions defence, particularly when you consider the government just aches to wave through the merger between Murdoch's News International and BSkyB. The announcement by Jeremy Hunt, media and culture secretary, was apparently delayed by the allegations, but this wasn't out of any concern for principle, merely presentation.

The thing I find baffling is that this is the one opportunity legislators have to rein in newspapers – not to restrict the freedom of the press, but to control its invasiveness and exorcise NI's influence in Downing Street. This is a rare chance for politicians to restore some kind of balance to the situation, where newspapers act within the law and are subject to the kind of scrutiny that is applied remorselessly by journalists to every public figure and institution across the land. As to News International, it has been plain for a long time that the company has far too much power and should be put in its place.

"Ah!" cry Murdoch's defenders, "you're just using the phone-hacking scandal to attack our revered leader." That is true to a tiny degree, but even the laziest mind and the most inert conscience have no difficulty in seeing this issue in terms of right and wrong. Here is a major media company whose senior executives, it is alleged, were serially commissioning criminal acts, which involved not just private detective Glenn Mulcaire listening to people's phone messages, but a much more sinister individual named Jonathan Rees, who had a network of contacts in the police, despite his conviction and prison term for conspiring to plant cocaine on a woman so that her husband would get custody of her children.

This man is an unpleasant piece of work. His activities allegedly included illegally targeting bank accounts, bribing and blackmailing police officers and hacking into hard drives and email accounts. That Rees had access to Straw's private affairs when he was home secretary or Mandelson's when he was trade secretary is appalling. Blair and Campbell are both involved and it is known that details of King's mortgage were sold when he was deputy governor of the Bank of England.

Straw is said to be shocked by the revelations and with good reason – it is difficult to comprehend how such a serious breach of security was allowed to happen. Quite apart from bugging the home secretary, Rees is accused of using a hacker to steal information about MI6 agents working undercover in the Provisional IRA. Where was the security service while this was going on?

And there is a legion of concerns about the behaviour of the police over the last five years, their relations with News International and their failure to follow up evidence of wrongdoing, which is why we must be absolutely certain that the hundreds of thousands of documents produced by the investigation into Rees's activities are included in Operation Weeting. Only then will we gain a full picture of the criminal activities of newspapers.

Mandelson has called for Operation Weeting to be formally extended to include all the newspapers that paid Rees to acquire the personal information of such people as the Duchess of Cambridge. NI welcomed this because the company obviously hopes that its acute embarrassment will be diluted with the exposure of others. But let's not forget that there is no other company or organisation in Britain that could have come so far in this scandal without being forced to sack board members and order a wholesale clear out of the tier of executives heavily implicated in criminal behaviour. It is a measure of Murdoch's embedded influence that no public inquiry has been announced and NI has not suffered in any material way. On the contrary, it is about to be awarded a huge prize that will give him greatly enhanced powers to dictate terms in the market and to the government of the day.

Don't let vested interests tell you this story doesn't matter: it does – to all of us, because on this issue rests the future health of politics, journalism and our society.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... ernational
 
Thanks for that, very unsettling. Looks like Murdoch and his cronies are becoming the elite they professed to wish to get rid of.
 
Dear God, will these scum stop at nothing?

Missing Milly Dowler's voicemail was hacked by News of the World

• Deleted voicemails gave family false hope
• Hacking interfered with police hunt
• Family lawyer: actions 'heinous and despicable'


The News of the World illegally targeted the missing schoolgirl Milly Dowler and her family in March 2002, interfering with police inquiries into her disappearance, an investigation by the Guardian has established.

Scotland Yard are investigating the episode, which is likely to put new pressure on the then editor of the paper, Rebekah Brooks, now Rupert Murdoch's chief executive in the UK; and the then deputy editor, Andy Coulson, who resigned in January as the prime minister's media adviser.

Milly's family lawyer this afternoon issued a statement in which he described the News of the World's activities as "heinous" and "despicable". Milly Dowler, then aged 13, disappeared on her way home in Walton-on-Thames, Surrey on 21 March 2002.

Detectives from Scotland Yard's new inquiry into the phone hacking, Operation Weeting, are believed to have found evidence of the targeting of the Dowlers in a collection of 11,000 pages of notes kept by Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator jailed for phone hacking on behalf of the News of the World.

During the last four weeks the Met officers have approached Surrey police and taken formal statements from some of those involved in the original inquiry, who were concerned about how News of the World journalists intercepted – and deleted – the voicemail messages of Milly Dowler.

The messages were deleted by journalists in the first few days after Milly's disappearance so as to free up space for more messages. As a result friends and relatives of Milly concluded wrongly that she might still be alive. Police feared evidence may have been destroyed.

The Guardian investigation has shown that, within a very short time of Milly vanishing News of the World journalists reacted by engaging in what was then standard practice in their newsroom – they hired private investigators to get them a story.

Their first step was simple, albeit illegal. Paperwork seen by the Guardian reveals that they paid a Hampshire private investigator, Steve Whittamore, to obtain home addresses and, where necessary, ex-directory phone numbers for any families called Dowler in the Walton area. The three addresses which Whittamore found could be obtained lawfully, using the electoral register. The two ex-directory numbers, however, were "blagged" illegally from British Telecom's confidential records by one of Whittamore's associates, John Gunning, who works from a base in Wiltshire. One of the ex-directory numbers was attributed by Whittamore to Milly's family home.

Then, with the help of their own full-time private investigator, Glenn Mulcaire, the News of the World started illegally intercepting mobile phone messages. Scotland Yard are now investigating evidence that they hacked direct into the voicemail of the missing girl's own phone. As her friends and parents called and left messages imploring Milly to get in touch with them, the News of the World were listening and recording their every private word.

But the journalists at the News of the World then encountered a problem. Milly's voicemail box filled up and would accept no more messages. Apparently thirsty for more information from more voicemails, the News of the World intervened – and deleted the messages which had been left in the first few days after her disappearance.

According to one source, this had a devastating effect: when her friends and family called again and discovered that her voicemail had been cleared, they concluded that this must have been done by Milly herself and, therefore, that she must still be alive. But she was not. The interference created false hope and extra agony for those who were misled by it.

The Dowler family then granted an exclusive interview to the News of the World in which they talked about their hope, quite unaware that it had been falsely kindled by the newspaper's own intervention. Sally Dowler told them: "If Milly walked through the door, I don't think we'd be able to speak. We'd just weep tears of joy and give her a great big hug."

The deletion of the messages also caused difficulties for the police. It confused the picture at a time when they had few real leads to pursue. It also potentially destroyed valuable evidence. According to one senior source familiar with the Surrey police investigation: "It can happen with abduction murders that the perpetrator will leave messages, asking the missing person to get in touch, as part of their efforts at concealment. We need those messages as evidence. Anybody who destroys that evidence is seriously interfering with the course of a police investigation."

The newspaper made little effort to conceal the hacking from its readers. On 14 April 2002, they published a story about a woman who was allegedly pretending to be Milly Dowler and who had applied for a job with a recruitment agency: "It is thought the hoaxer even gave the agency Milly's real mobile phone number … The agency used the number to contact Milly when a job vacancy arose and left a message on her voicemail … It was on March 27, six days after Milly went missing, that the employment agency appears to have phoned her mobile."

The newspaper also made no effort to conceal their activity from Surrey police. After they had hacked the message from the recruitment agency on Milly's phone, they informed police about it. It was Surrey detectives who established that the call was not intended for Milly Dowler. At the time Surrey police suspected that phones belonging to detectives and to Milly's parents also were being targeted.

One of those who was involved in the original inquiry said: "We'd arrange landline calls. We didn't trust our mobiles."

However, they took no action against the News of the World, partly because their main focus was to find the missing schoolgirl and partly because this was only one example of tabloid misbehaviour. As one source close to the inquiry put it: "There was a hell of a lot of dirty stuff going on."

In a statement today, the family's lawyer, Mark Lewis of Taylor Hampton, said the Dowlers were distressed at the revelation: "It is distress heaped upon tragedy to learn that the News of the World had no humanity at such a terrible time. The fact that they were prepared to act in such a heinous way that could have jeopardised the police investigation and give them false hope is despicable."

During the last four weeks, officers from Scotland Yard's new inquiry into the phone-hacking, Operation Weeting, have approached Surrey police and taken formal statements from some of those who were involved in the original inquiry. Two earlier Yard inquiries had failed to investigate the relevant notes in Mulcaire's logs.

The News of the World's investigation was part of a long-running campaign against paedophiles championed by the then editor, Rebekah Brooks. Labour MP Tom Watson last week told the House of Commons that four months after Milly Dowler's disappearance, the News of the World had targeted one of the parents of the two 10-year-old Soham girls, Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells, who were abducted and murdered on 4 August 2002.

The behaviour of tabloid newspapers became an issue in the trial of Levi Bellfield, who last month was jailed for the rest of his life for murdering Milly Dowler. A second charge, that he had attempted to abduct another Surrey schoolgirl, Rachel Cowles, had to be left on the file after premature publicity by tabloids were held to have made it impossible for the jury to reach a fair verdict. The tabloids, however, focused their anger on Bellfield's defence lawyer, complaining that the questioning had caused unnecessary pain to Milly Dowler's parents.

Surrey police referred all questions on the subject to Scotland Yard, who said they could not discuss it.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/jul/0 ... s-of-world
 
Just heard this on the radio, absolutely vile behaviour. And all to make a lot of money with tomorrow's chips wrappers.
 
Something i'm amazed anything still shocks me, but that did.

These guys need putting down.
 
BlackRiverFalls said:
...

These guys need putting down.
Instead, Murdoch and his spawn will be handed BSkyB, on a platter, as Cameron and his chums ritually kiss their rings.
 
Is there no law that can effectively close down the newspaper?

I doubt Joe Public will remember this story and choose not to buy NoW, but surely there is something that can be done.

I don't want to see a restricted press in this country, but ffs, NOW doesn't need restricting, it needs sinking.
 
Massive amount of News International arse-covering - sorry, distancing, today as more revelations come out. Can't help but be sceptical to their claims of knowing nothing about it.
 
Look - they knew nothing about it.

They paid this firm to drag up dirt - any dirt - on a news story. They don't decide on how they got their information and, in fact, they don't give a shit. If this firm's discovered to do nasty things then News International can honestly say they didn't know how any information was found or what the firm did to get information. That's why the firm is paid a lot of money by New International.

"Here's a wad of cash - get some dirt. Don't care how you do it, don't want to know. If we can use any of your stuff, we will. Otherwise, we won't and ignore what litter is sticking to your information."
 
I'd have largely agreed with that but the allegations on Channel 4 News tonight, if true, would appear to suggest a more sinister turn:

From 7:44pm on linked page


Channel 4 News has made claims about how the News of the World placed senior Metropolitan police detective under surveillance at a time he was investigating the murder of a private eye with links to individuals who worked for the paper.

Here's an outline of its report:

It said a Detective Chief Superintendent Dave Cook, a senior police officer who appeared on Crimewatch, claimed he was told by colleagues that he was under surveillance by News of the World when he was investigating the 1987 murder of Daniel Morgan, a private investigator.

The C4 report said police discovered that vans leased to News of the World had been witnessed tailing Cook. It said NoW was investigating whether Cook was having an affair with Jackie Haynes, a Crimewatch presenter who was in fact his wife.

C4 says the timing of the NoW surveillance was disturbing because suspects in a case being investigated by Cook were private investigators with close links to NoW.

C4 added that Brooks was challenged by police over this at a meeting in 2002. News International was quoted saying it was not aware of the claims but would investigate. It said it could not confirm or deny Brooks' meeting with police.

It said Cook and Haynes were informed two months ago about documentation of surveillance found among notes seized from Glenn Mulcaire. It said they were both considering legal action.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/blog/20 ... ve-updates

Bear in mind that the accused in the Daniel Morgan murder was Jonathan Rees, his business partner and a hired investigator for the NOTW. The case was dropped earlier this year by Scotland Yard. At the time of this alleged episode he was in jail for perverting the course of justice.

If the meeting with Brooks did take place and has been accurately described then this is as serious an allegation as has been made so far and should cause considerable fall-out for a number of people associated with News International.
 
Look - they knew nothing about it.

They paid this firm to drag up dirt - any dirt - on a news story. They don't decide on how they got their information and, in fact, they don't give a shit. If this firm's discovered to do nasty things then News International can honestly say they didn't know how any information was found or what the firm did to get information.

This defence won't stand.

1. A NotW hack has already gone to jail over this, so the idea that nobody at the paper knew what was going is already shot to pieces.

2. One published story about Milly Dowler actually stated explicitly what was in a voicemail message. They weren't even being subtle about it. They just thought they were untouchable.

Individuals should be prosecuted, yes... but more importantly someone should have the balls to state clearly that News International is not fit and proper to operate media outlets in the UK.
 
Cultjunky said:
Is there no law that can effectively close down the newspaper?

I doubt Joe Public will remember this story and choose not to buy NoW, but surely there is something that can be done.

I don't want to see a restricted press in this country, but ffs, NOW doesn't need restricting, it needs sinking.

Joe Public has a short-term memory, but the more of this filth that bubbles up, the more likely that major advertisers will stop doing business with the paper - especially if shareholders start making unhappy noises.
 
Can't help but be sceptical to their claims of knowing nothing about it.


Look - they knew nothing about it.

The phrase "plausible deniability" springs readily to mind, as I'm sure it did to Ms. Brooks's.
 
It gets worse. Particularly disturbing, although unsurprising, is the mention of large cash payments to individual policemen:

News of the World 'hacked 7/7 family phones'

Families of 7/7 bombing victims may have had their phones hacked by the News of the World, it has emerged.

A solicitor representing some of the relatives said one family had been contacted by police and told their phone may have been hacked in 2005.

New allegations have also emerged of payments to the police by the paper.

The tabloid's owners have passed to the police e-mails which appear to show that payments were authorised by the then editor, Andy Coulson.

The BBC's business editor Robert Peston said the e-mails appear to show payments to police amounting to tens of thousands of pounds.

'Very transparent'

Graham Foulkes, whose son David died in the Edgware Road blast, told the BBC he was contacted by officers on Tuesday after his details were found on a list as part of the police inquiry in hacking claims.

Mr Foulkes, of Oldham, Greater Manchester, recalled how his family had waited for a week after the 2005 attacks for news of David.

"My wife and I were kind of all over the place, we were chatting to friends on the phone, in a very personal and deeply emotional context - and the thought that somebody may have been listening to that just looking for a cheap headline is just horrendous."

He said police contacted him on Tuesday when they became aware of media reports that 7/7 victims' families may have had their phones hacked.

Mr Foulkes said he would like to meet News International's owner, Rupert Murdoch, to talk to him about "the power he has".

He added: "I certainly think that News International need to come clean, they need to accept their responsibility and their culpability, and they need to do the decent thing, but I suppose they won't."

Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, News International's director of corporate affairs, Simon Greenberg, said a meeting between Mr Murdoch and Mr Foulkes was "something we would consider".

He added: "Given this is an ongoing police investigation, I cannot go into any detail about what is in those e-mails. The e-mails were passed over to the police some time ago.


Cambridgeshire Police said Met detectives visited the parents of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman "We have been very transparent with police, very open. We have a co-operative relationship with them where we hand them information if we discover something which we think may be of information to them."

He added that the sentiments which former editor Rebekah Brooks expressed on Tuesday in relation to Milly Dowler's phone being hacked also applied to the families of the 7/7 bombings and the Soham murders who may also have had their phones hacked.

In a memo to staff on Tuesday, Ms Brooks said the allegations were "almost too horrific to believe" and that she was "sickened" by them.

News International has promised the "strongest possible action" if it is proven Milly's phone was hacked.

Mr Coulson has not commented on the latest allegations, although it has been reported he has told friends he suspects he is being used to deflect attention from News International.

Other developments include:

MPs are to hold an urgent debate on Wednesday into whether there should be a public inquiry into phone hacking;
This follows a call by Labour MP Chris Bryant, who accused the News of the World of "playing God with a family's emotions";
Car maker Ford has announced a halt on advertising in the News of the World, pending the newspaper's investigation and response;
The Guardian newspaper has alleged murdered Surrey schoolgirl Milly Dowler's phone was hacked by private investigator Glenn Mulcaire, who was working for the News of the World, when she was missing;
Mulcaire has apologised "to anybody who was hurt or upset by what I have done";
The parents of murdered Soham girls Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman have been contacted by police investigating phone-hacking;
Paul Dadge from Cannock, who helped survivors outside Edgware Road tube station after the 7/7 bombing, says he has also been contacted by police investigating phone hacking;
'Illicit techniques'

Business editor Robert Peston said the e-mail disclosure was "a significant development".

The News of the World has already started paying compensation for phone-hacking. Now it's facing another financial penalty - a loss of advertising.

Following the Milly Dowler allegations, Ford has suspended its advertisements, saying "it cares about the standards of behaviour of those it deals with externally".

Halifax and Npower say they are reviewing their options. Tesco and Virgin Media say they're awaiting the outcome of the police investigations.

Many will applaud Ford's action. But should advertisers use their financial muscle to try to influence the behaviour of the media? It is not usually regarded as a good thing for big business to threaten newspapers and broadcasters, particularly over editorial issues.

There have been exceptions. Carphone Warehouse stopped sponsoring Channel 4's Big Brother, following allegations of racism towards Shilpa Shetty. It's the advertisers' money - but are they the right people to tell the media how to behave?
"When you have payments of tens of thousands of pounds, it seems to me to be pretty inconceivable that the only people who know about this is the editor and the reporter."

He said it had an important political dimension, in that Mr Coulson went on to work for David Cameron as director of communications at 10 Downing Street.

Mr Coulson resigned from that post in January, saying the phone-hacking scandal has made it hard to focus on his government role.

Our correspondent said it also shows that the police investigation into alleged illicit techniques used by the News of the World to obtain stories goes much wider than an examination of the hacking of mobile phones.

The Metropolitan Police launched Operation Weeting in January this year after new phone-hacking claims emerged. The force has faced criticism for its initial inquiry in 2006 into phone-hacking at the paper.

That probe led to the convictions and imprisonment of Mulcaire and then News of the World royal editor Clive Goodman in 2007 for conspiracy to access phone messages left for members of the royal household.

A number of alleged phone-hacking victims have since reached out-of-court settlements with the newspaper.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14040841
 
Hugh Grant, whose phone was hacked, said putting Brooks in charge of the investigation was like putting Hitler in charge of cleaning up the Nazis. Most of the news today has been about advertisers pulling out of the NOTW.
 
Most of the news today has been about advertisers pulling out of the NOTW.

The Commons debate was pretty big news too... and for once showed the House in a positive light.

I hope that there may now be a cross-party move to tame Murdoch, and I hope it doesn't turn into a partisan affair. Both major parties have been far too quick to suck up to News International. Time for action.
 
Did families of war dead have phones hacked?

The relatives of soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan have been warned that their phones may have been hacked by the private investigator working for the News of the World, according to tomorrow's Daily Telegraph.

The private phone numbers of the families of servicemen who died on the front line have been found in the files of Glenn Mulcaire, whose work is the focus of a police investigation involving 50 police officers.

By saying that there could be worse revelations to come, News International as good as invited rival journalists to contact anyone from the families of the war dead to the families of tsunami victims to see if they had been notified by the police that their numbers were on Glenn Mulcaire's little list.

A senior source at News International told me tonight: "The military is a cause central to the heart of News International. If this story is correct we are absolutely shocked and appalled that that tradition has been besmirched".

The News of the World and the Sun have prided themselves on their support for Help the Heroes, campaigns for the military covenant and other military causes.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14056845

Anyone wanting to sign up to that campaign can do so here.

Anyone wanting to listen in to the private grief of bereaved families whilst claiming to act on their behalf should sign up here.
 
Disgusting behaviour. Though Ross Kemp may make a few series out of it?
Ex-bird tap, tap, tap. One each for Mary, Mungo & Midge.
How powerless am I meant to feel as an individual voter against the Murdoch heft? Oh Gawd...
 
gncxx said:
Most of the news today has been about advertisers pulling out of the NOTW.

And that is how you shut down a newspaper. No law needed. Although the short term memory of the general populace (of which we are all a part) might work against the idea.
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14040841

News of the World 'hacked 7/7 family phones

BBC News (online) 6 July 2011

'Families of 7/7 bombing victims may have had their phones hacked by the News of the World, it has emerged.

A solicitor for some of the relatives said one family had been told their phone may have been hacked in 2005.

The paper has also passed to police e-mails which allegedly show payments by it to the police were approved by the then editor Andy Coulson.

Meanwhile, the journalist who sanctioned hacking murdered girl Milly Dowler's phone has been identified.

...
Screw the News of the World, will the BSkyB deal still go through?
 
I think the government line was that these current revelations cannot legally be brought into consideration at this stage. That's not to say that I buy that though - the government can do, change and counter nearly anything they wish with a determined enough expenditure of willpower and political capital.
 
I think the government line was that these current revelations cannot legally be brought into consideration at this stage.

Yes that's their line, but I'm not buying it either.

It was reported yesterday that Ofcom can trigger a "fit and proper" investigation but they cannot do so unless charges are brought against senior NI executives.
 
Back
Top