I'm not sure if this is the right place for this thread so please move it if there is a more appropriate place.
I've recently been reading about King Arthur and one book led to another (& another...) and have followed the trail to the stories about the Fisher King. I know that medieval literature is almost full of allegory, but two things have struck me:
1, the "wound" that the king suffers from in some of the stories is in his groin (or in some stories his leg or thigh) and does not heal. Could this be a reference to a kind of "feminising" of the king by way of reference to menstruation? I cannot, surely, be the only one to have thought of this? (could this also lead to the story from the bible regarding the woman healed by touching Jesus's gown?)
2, Henry VIIIth was said to have a weeping sore on this leg that would not heal and caused him great discomfort. Was this mentioned about him to lead people at the time to compare him to the legend of the fisher king?
I would be interested to hear other opinions on this.
I've recently been reading about King Arthur and one book led to another (& another...) and have followed the trail to the stories about the Fisher King. I know that medieval literature is almost full of allegory, but two things have struck me:
1, the "wound" that the king suffers from in some of the stories is in his groin (or in some stories his leg or thigh) and does not heal. Could this be a reference to a kind of "feminising" of the king by way of reference to menstruation? I cannot, surely, be the only one to have thought of this? (could this also lead to the story from the bible regarding the woman healed by touching Jesus's gown?)
2, Henry VIIIth was said to have a weeping sore on this leg that would not heal and caused him great discomfort. Was this mentioned about him to lead people at the time to compare him to the legend of the fisher king?
I would be interested to hear other opinions on this.