• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

The New Barbarism

jefflovestone

Gone But Not Forgotten
(ACCOUNT RETIRED)
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
1,134
I’ve started a new thread rather than continue from the otherin Mainstream News Stories as I believe that it’s a far wider issue than education and I don’t want to derail the existing thread. Also, this is a very long post and I didn’t want to rude and just drop something so big in an existing thread.

I’m not one for ascribing a single explanation to anything as I tend to think that’s often too simplistic an approach. I agree with the other comments in the thread that education does play a part, however, I don’t think it’s the underlying cause and I certainly don’t think changes to the curriculum will actually alter anything on their own.

Whilst I don’t think it’s necessarily the root cause, I think there’s one thing that seems to factor in most of the aspects or symptoms of what’s happening in modern society and that’s the idea of ‘worth’. I know the word ‘respect’ seems to get bandied about by politicians and journalists as being a root cause, but I think the idea of respect alone relies on too many other things to really be that cohesive an argument. I’m aware that ‘worth’ also has problems in that it’s relative/subjective but I think the idea of ‘worth’ covers more problems/symptoms than ‘respect’.

There just seems to be an amazing lack of worth attached to anything anymore; very few people seem to place any value on anything or anyone and when value is placed on something, it just seems so misplaced; the value our society places in terms of cultural significance and financial worth on footballers and reality TV contestants is, to me, mindboggling. Elsewhere, most things just seem to lack any ‘real’ worth at all. Human life now seems to have very little value to it; not only in the sense of casual disregard with which assaults and murders take place but also the way this is now reflected by the legal system: how often do you read news items now along the lines of offenders having a blasé nonchalance for their crimes with victims or their families wondering how 2 years is a fair sentence?

I think identity and the sense of self-worth is eroding on numerous fronts. I think various problems to do with identity are having a massive impact this. I think over the last couple of decades there’s been some pretty big shifts in our attitudes to gender/sex that have created some big fault lines in society. For instance, the role of men and ‘what men do’ is becoming pretty vague. Similarly the role of the woman in society has opened up and changed from being the new supermum with career to the increasing pressure to conform to increasingly impossible body types and looks etc. Now, that’s not to say, some of these changes weren’t necessary at all – I don’t subscribe to the idea that women should be submissive in society, stay at home whilst men are breadwinners with the right to abuse or belittle women – just that, as with all change, there is ramifications or at least periods of adjustment. Whatever changes are happening here, I think that it’s affecting a lot of people’s sense of worth as they are uncertain as how they fit in society and whether society wants or needs them.

Maybe the similarly needed changes in the notion of class and the shift towards this middle-class-lite that many recent politicians have advocated rears it head too?

The nature of work and employment is changing too. What people actually do for a living has changed dramatically over the last couple of decades. Whilst this has happened before with the obvious shift from agricultural to industrial jobs in the past, I think there was a marked difference. I think that people, at the time, thought it was genuinely the way forward and that’s how things were going to be: the start of a new age. Now it could be argued that the shift from manufacturing &c. to office-based work is similar in that it’s another technology-driven change in society and another ‘new age’, I think there’s an uncertainty about the safety of jobs on a scale never really seen before. I know there’s been ‘pluggers’ and ‘Luddites’ in the past, but, again the difference here is the sense of scale and that it seems to affect most people now.

The days of a job for life seem to be over as with any idea that most people could leave a job on Friday and start another on Monday. Also, the idea of ‘job threats from abroad’ is nothing new either, but has it ever really been on the scale that it is now? I think the uncertainty of the workplace and the fact that there are people queuing up to replace them just compounds a lack of self-worth. Similarly, the uncertainty of jobs maybe affecting some schoolchildren as the idea of what they want to do when they leave school seems like some weird, nebulous target they can’t get a handle on – hence the recent findings about a gobsmacking percentage of people wanting to be ‘famous’ when they leave school as if it was a job in itself.

The consumer and disposable society I think plays a big part in this too. I think there’s been a generation that has grown up with no real sense of worth when it comes to buying and owning things. Whilst the ‘never never’ and Higher Purchase are, again, nothing new, it’s the scale of credit card spending in this country that is different now. I think credit and finance and the worryingly availability of it has detached people from the reality of owning and buying things. For some people, those with a detached sense of owning and buying, there might be this extended thinking that other people have a similar attitude towards ownership too – this idea that it’s ‘easy come, easy go’ and, with the nature of mass-produced, that anything and everything can be easily be replaced and with that no room for sentimentality etc.

Thanks to anyone who made it to the end. Any of this makes sense?
 
Yes, Jeff, a lot of it makes sense. I'm struggling with a bad cold at the moment, so my concentration isn't fantastic, but one thing that leapt out at me immediately was when you say:
...hence the recent findings about a gobsmacking percentage of people wanting to be ‘famous’ when they leave school as if it was a job in itself.
..could this be the utterly hi-jacked term "respect"? "Famous" people are the only ones who seem to get any these days, so rather than striving to be a policeman or a doctor or an astronaut or (heaven forfend) a teacher, for whom hardly any children (or indeed a number of adults) seem to have any regard or respect, kids instead seem to focus on those who will get some admiration, however misguidedly. I don't think fame in itself is the objective, it's the trappings and the praise that goes with it. And praise is something everyone desires, deep down - and there's precious little of that around these days either.

Now, does any of that make sense :)? I need more Lemsip.
 
Someone on Radio 4 recently posited that the decline in competitive school sport has contributed to the growth of gang culture. I'm sure it's not quite that simple but it does strike me that most people, young boys particularly, need to feel they can identify with a group and be part of a hierarchy.

I have a worse cold than you, and I have to make someone's dinner.
 
Bring back the birch! :twisted:

Well, maybe that goes a little too far, but there has been a retreat from meaningful punishment for crimes and anti-social behaviour.

Punishment should emphasise to the trangessors (and potential transgressors) just what the limits of acceptable behaviour in society are, but we seem to have gone soft. Parents and teachers are forbidden to use corporal punishment, so the lines between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour have become blurred for today's children. Is it any wonder then that they grow up into hooligans and criminals, with no respect for the rights of others.

Of course there is no simple panacea - even in the days when corporal punishment was acceptable, some people still grew up to be hooligans and criminals. But, I should say, not on the scale that we see today, where many elderly folk are afraid to go out of doors at night for fear of hooligans whose age range is pre-teens and upward.

Teenage gangs now murder each other, and any well-meaning adult who tries to remonstrate with them....

And as I write, the One Show is starting off on anarchy and anti-social behaviour.....
 
beakboo said:
... but it does strike me that most people, young boys particularly, need to feel they can identify with a group and be part of a hierarchy.
IMHO it was ever thus. Teddyboys, Mods, Rockers, Skinheads; there is always a new gang culture ready to replace the last, and the Media loves to scare us with dire tales of flick knives, bike chains guns or whatever.
I see nothing new here, just another fashionable mutation of tribal behaviour, this time based on the American gang model. In a year or two there will be something new to be morally outraged about.
 
rynner said:
Punishment should emphasise to the trangessors (and potential transgressors) just what the limits of acceptable behaviour in society are, but we seem to have gone soft. Parents and teachers are forbidden to use corporal punishment, so the lines between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour have become blurred for today's children. Is it any wonder then that they grow up into hooligans and criminals, with no respect for the rights of others.

I don't think it's a question of going soft. It seems to me these kids have no positive male role models to live up to. (It may be a generalisation to say it's footballers or rappers instead of a strong father figure).
Imo, punishment doesn't do that much to stop the crime as most violent actions are carried out without thought of the consequences.

I have forgotten the source (it may have been from someone at Leicester uni) but they concluded that paying attention, showing kids some respect and providing them with positive role models at early teen stage would potentially make them think twice before committing a crime. If the crimes aren't committed this works out far cheaper than trying to implement measure after measure of half-thought out ideas.
Unbearably liberal for some to stomach but it's an idea that should be invested in.

I suppose if you asked most kids what they want when they grow up they would say 'to be famous' and maybe they see that as the easiest way to get what they really want -pics in the paper, big cars, every night in a VIP club, lots of cash and the latest designer labels. Of course the celebrity myth just keeps the whole thing going and the charade of fashion - which is the ultimate in recycling of old ideas and styles is rammed down their throats at the first available opportunity. Designer toddler clothes?


The more reactionary would say that National Service is the answer but why should military discipline necessary? A better idea would be to have some sort of peace corp and let them travel abroad and see how bad other cultures have it while doing a good deed in return.

Rant over.
 
It seems to me that nowadays wanting such things as fame etc. is essentially immature - people want something for not much perceptible effort. It's an almost childlike quality - wanting an easy lifestyle, being pampered, your whims catered to, etc.. It also seems that kids are under a certain amount of pressure to be adults before it's really the time to do so (the term 'young adult' has always struck me as being particularly daft). So on the one hand they hanker after child-like things, but at the same time are under pressure to be more like adults. There seems to be a blurring between when they're expected to be children and when to be adults, and the influence of the latter is perhaps being introduced too early.
 
Jerry_B said:
It seems to me that nowadays wanting such things as fame etc. is essentially immature - people want something for not much perceptible effort. It's an almost childlike quality - wanting an easy lifestyle, being pampered, your whims catered to, etc.. It also seems that kids are under a certain amount of pressure to be adults before it's really the time to do so (the term 'young adult' has always struck me as being particularly daft). So on the one hand they hanker after child-like things, but at the same time are under pressure to be more like adults. There seems to be a blurring between when they're expected to be children and when to be adults, and the influence of the latter is perhaps being introduced too early.
Quite agree.

Last night I was out at a social club, and there were some children there (ages up to 12, maybe) playing cards. But the girls were wearing make-up, and the phrase 'Painted Babies' came to me...


(They were also rather plump, and stuffing themselves with junk food, but that's another topic...)
 
ArthurASCII said:
beakboo said:
... but it does strike me that most people, young boys particularly, need to feel they can identify with a group and be part of a hierarchy.
IMHO it was ever thus. Teddyboys, Mods, Rockers, Skinheads; there is always a new gang culture ready to replace the last, and the Media loves to scare us with dire tales of flick knives, bike chains guns or whatever.
I see nothing new here, just another fashionable mutation of tribal behaviour, this time based on the American gang model. In a year or two there will be something new to be morally outraged about.

You've seen more decades than i and, accordingly, more variations on the gang culture, but do you really think the current incarnations are nothing new? For me, the body count alone sets them apart. Whereas a solid beating may well have been common, we now have plenty of those plus a growing number of murders committed by young people.
 
I think it is due to global warming.



That, and the fact that kids can do anything they want and the worst they will get is a Paddington hard stare. An occasional clip aorund the ear would do wonders.
 
theyithian said:
...

You've seen more decades than i and, accordingly, more variations on the gang culture, but do you really think the current incarnations are nothing new? For me, the body count alone sets them apart. Whereas a solid beating may well have been common, we now have plenty of those plus a growing number of murders committed by young people.
If you'd been listening to BBC Radio4's PM prog. tonight, you'd have heard one commentator point out that crimes of violence involving knives had actually dropped considerably since 1999 and the number of actual serious assaults had stayed about the same.

There's a great deal of 'Silly Season' hype going on at the moment originating from the Media, particularly the Tabloids... According to the BBC.
 
Xanatico said:
An occasional clip aorund the ear would do wonders.

Spare the rod and spoil the child

Meaning

The notion that children will only flourish if punished, physically or otherwise, for any wrongdoing.

Origin

From the Bible, Proverbs 13-24 (King James Version):

He that spareth his rod hateth his son.

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/328950.html



rynner's NB: ...or otherwise
 
Pietro_Mercurios said:
There's a great deal of 'Silly Season' hype going on at the moment originating from the Media, particularly the Tabloids... According to the BBC.
So that's all right then.

But if I go out and get murdered, I'll come back to haunt you...


But did R4's statistics relate to the violent crimes now being committed by children...?
 
rynner said:
Pietro_Mercurios said:
There's a great deal of 'Silly Season' hype going on at the moment originating from the Media, particularly the Tabloids... According to the BBC.
So that's all right then.

But if I go out and get murdered, I'll come back to haunt you...


But did R4's statistics relate to the violent crimes now being committed by children...?
The also said that a poll showed that 42% of those asked were too frightened to leave their houses at night.

The question is, just how much of this fear is engendered by the realities of living in modern Britain and how much is a whipped up Media panic, like those of previous Summer Recesses?

Arthur and the Beeb could be right.
 
Pietro_Mercurios said:
theyithian said:
...

You've seen more decades than i and, accordingly, more variations on the gang culture, but do you really think the current incarnations are nothing new? For me, the body count alone sets them apart. Whereas a solid beating may well have been common, we now have plenty of those plus a growing number of murders committed by young people.
If you'd been listening to BBC Radio4's PM prog. tonight, you'd have heard one commentator point out that crimes of violence involving knives had actually dropped considerably since 1999 and the number of actual serious assaults had stayed about the same.

There's a great deal of 'Silly Season' hype going on at the moment originating from the Media, particularly the Tabloids... According to the BBC.

I think we are talking at cross-purposes. I'm talking about the proportion of murders and knife-attacks commited by young people. Not the statistics for such crime on the whole.

I've heard similiar analyses agreeing with what you state - one good one on R4 by Nick Ross actually - that distinguish between public perception of crime and 'true' crime statistics. (Although unreported crime is always an X-factor in such figures).

edit: what Rynner said.
edit2: and i'm not convinced at all that this is silly season reporting.
These are: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-p ... 954728.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leic ... 955496.stm - get the flavour?
 
theyithian said:
...

I think we are talking at cross-purposes. I'm talking about the proportion of murders and knife-attacks commited by young people. Not the statistics for such crime on the whole.

...
And then there's the growing fear of young people in Britain ...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6074252.stm

British adults 'fear youngsters'

BBC News Online. 22 October 2006

Britain is in danger of becoming a nation fearful of its young people, a report has claimed.

It says British adults are less likely than those in Europe to intervene when teenagers commit anti-social behaviour.

The Institute for Public Policy Research blamed changes in the family, communities and the economy for the "increased risk of youth crime".

Children's charity Barnardo's echoed the claims, saying youngsters have been "demonised" by the media.

The report says 65% of Germans, 52% of Spanish and 50% of Italians would be willing to intervene if they saw a group of 14-year-old boys vandalising a bus shelter, compared with just 34% of Britons.

The IPPR also said teenagers needed structured activities like drama and sports clubs.

Julia Margot, from the IPPR, told the BBC Radio Five Live: "In Britain, as opposed to countries like Spain and Italy, adults are less likely to socialise with children in the evenings.

"So we don't have this culture of children hanging out and playing out in the town square where adults are also socialising and drinking.

"We don't have a culture where adults go out to pubs and bars and bring children with them, and so there is a problem about adults being less used to having children around."

...
 
Jerry_B said:
It seems to me that nowadays wanting such things as fame etc. is essentially immature - people want something for not much perceptible effort. It's an almost childlike quality - wanting an easy lifestyle, being pampered, your whims catered to, etc.
The world owes everyone a living. It's a something for nothing mentality that's the product of bone idle laziness.
 
Silly Season?

Mob lays siege to police station

Fifteen people have been arrested after a police station in Norfolk came under siege in the early hours from a crowd of 100 people hurling bottles.
The attack in Great Yarmouth happened after police arrested three people in a van carrying sound equipment.

Police said 200 officers from across the region then broke up an "unlicensed music event" at a warehouse on Harfrey industrial estate just before midday.

Forty-four cars were seized at the event, a police spokesman said.

'Serious risk'

The attack on the police station was declared a major incident by Norfolk Police and Ch Supt Bob Scully said: "We acted swiftly to control the situation and restore order.

"What occurred was entirely unacceptable and inexcusable.

"This was large scale anti-social behaviour and officers dealing with the incident were put at serious risk.

"It is behaviour that won't be tolerated."

Two police vehicles were damaged and officers narrowly avoid serious injuries, police said.


More than 100 officers from Norfolk, Suffolk, Essex and Cambridgeshire police forces took part in the operation, which finally ended at 1030BST.

People have been warned to stay away from the Harfrey industrial estate, which is being treated as a crime scene.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/norfolk/6953609.stm

Don't you just love this Silly Season fun? :evil:
 
Pietro_Mercurios said:
The question is, just how much of this fear is engendered by the realities of living in modern Britain and how much is a whipped up Media panic, like those of previous Summer Recesses?
And how much of it is because of a whipped up media panic? True. However. A man in Warrington the other week stepped out of his house to tell a group of youths to stop vandalising. They set on him like a pack of dogs and killed him. That, unfortunately, is grim reality. Is this comparable in anyway to Britain of the past? Youths kill one another in the street. Innocent bystanders get shot. It's true that with every generation we have 'phases' but let that not be the reason to ignore the possibility that these phases could well be getting worse. I don't believe we can ever get a fair picture. Crime statistics we know are massaged, media reports we know are exaggerated. But living in the thick of it can tell quite a different story.
 
ghostdog19 said:
Jerry_B said:
It seems to me that nowadays wanting such things as fame etc. is essentially immature - people want something for not much perceptible effort. It's an almost childlike quality - wanting an easy lifestyle, being pampered, your whims catered to, etc.
The world owes everyone a living. It's a something for nothing mentality that's the product of bone idle laziness.
It's called 'Consumerism'
 
ghostdog19 said:
And how much of it is because of a whipped up media panic? True. However. A man in Warrington the other week stepped out of his house to tell a group of youths to stop vandalising. They set on him like a pack of dogs and killed him. That, unfortunately, is grim reality.
............
But living in the thick of it can tell quite a different story.
True.

I'm lucky in that in the last year I moved from a rough area to somewhere fairly genteel, but the nerves still return whenever I see a group of youngsters congregating.

It's really hateful that every time I go out, I find myself pondering my tactics of self-defence and/or counter-attack if I should be set upon.

And this is what this thread is really about.


FEAR.
 
rynner said:
...

Don't you just love this Silly Season fun? :evil:
It certainly makes a change from mobs attacking Paediatricians. Was that last year, or the year before?
 
rynner said:
I'm lucky in that in the last year I moved from a rough area to somewhere fairly genteel, but the nerves still return whenever I see a group of youngsters congregating.

It's really hateful that every time I go out, I find myself pondering my tactics of self-defence and/or counter-attack if I should be set upon.

And this is what this thread is really about.


FEAR.

But I seem to recall some people here acting oddly because of fear not long after 7/7, so it seems to me that part of what's going on is down to a perceived threat, that probably isn't there. By this I mean that whatever furore is out and about in the press at the moment tends to make things seem worse than they actually are. I don't think this is anything new - as ArthurASCII has pointed out. I mean, it's not as if we have huge gangs of youngsters knocking the shit out of each other, as was the case with Rockers and Mods - and that was 40-odd years ago!
 
It always seemed to me that a sea-change took place roundabout 1985 onwards. That seemed to be the point where children were being treated more like adults, certainly within the education system. And it seems that more 'young adults' are more aware of their rights and thus this sometimes tends to have flaws for actual adults who have to deal with them.
 
Pietro_Mercurios said:
rynner said:
...

Don't you just love this Silly Season fun? :evil:
It certainly makes a change from mobs attacking Paediatricians. Was that last year, or the year before?
Don't jest.

One of the (dis?)advantages of growing old is that one has many years experience of reading newspapers, and this provides a sense of what is 'silly season' and what is not. This experience also provides a database of general human activity against which to measure current activity.

And current social behaviour does not compare very well to what was common a generation or two ago.

We may not yet be in the End Times, but we're closer than we were...
 
I only really noticed 'troublesome youths' in really the last six, maybe seven years. Noticed it, I mean, to the degree that it appears to be now, like Alfred Hitchcock's "The Birds". To began with there was just one youth sitting on the climbing frame... now....
 
Pietro_Mercurios said:
And then there's the growing fear of young people in Britain ...

Don't quote me endless BBC reports. Tell me what you think. No need to gesture so much - give me your opinion! :)
 
ghostdog19 said:
I only really noticed 'troublesome youths' in really the last six, maybe seven years. Noticed it, I mean, to the degree that it appears to be now, like Alfred Hitchcock's "The Birds". To began with there was just one youth sitting on the climbing frame... now....
You don't remember the 1980's then? Riots and Strikes, Mass Unemployment and YOPS kids counting lamposts?

Or, maybe we've just got older?
 
Pietro_Mercurios said:
ghostdog19 said:
I only really noticed 'troublesome youths' in really the last six, maybe seven years. Noticed it, I mean, to the degree that it appears to be now, like Alfred Hitchcock's "The Birds". To began with there was just one youth sitting on the climbing frame... now....
You don't remember the 1980's then? Riots and Strikes, Mass Unemployment and YOPS kids counting lamposts?
Or, maybe we've just got older?
Or the 1880's when urchins would pick your pockets... I'm talking about more recent times and with the present situation.
Pietro_Mercurios said:
Or, maybe we've just got older?
So it was you that keyed our Cortina? You know this means war?
 
theyithian said:
Pietro_Mercurios said:
And then there's the growing fear of young people in Britain ...

Don't quote me endless BBC reports. Tell me what you think. No need to gesture so much - give me your opinion! :)
I've just watched the Hammer version of Quatermass and the Pit again. Which are you, Martian, or Mutant? :twisted:
 
Back
Top