lordmongrove
Justified & Ancient
- Joined
- May 30, 2009
- Messages
- 4,936
The Mysterious Pentyrch Incident
Im also a member of metabunk and helped to solve some mysteries. There was even a case me and the co-owner of the Dutch UFO sightnings site had one case of a triangular object captured in night.Re Metabunk and the quality of the explanations found there; Mick West's suggestions are usually quite good, and some of the other contributors are even better; but since the forum has a fairly wide range of membership, some of the proposed solutions are unworkable or over-complicated.
It must have been a fascinating sight out there on that cold, dark night in rural Wales. But it was a military operation that was widely known about and no-fly notices were in place for that very location:Not a case I am familiar with, however, I have incidentally come across the following and wondered if possibly of interest?
The Pentyrch UFO Incident | Documentary Special
Yes, I'm afraid I listened to half an hour or so yesterday, that was all I could stomach. I found it extremely self indulgent and childish. I'll be sticking to 'Talking Till Dawn' from now on.*bump*
Mysteries and Monsters is one of my favourite Fortean podcasts, however I cannot bring myself to listen to the Pentyrch witness and promoter Caz Clarke as I fear for my blood pressure:
https://www.podbean.com/podcast-detail/hn3bb-1ff342/Mysteries-and-Monsters-Podcast
Has anyone listened to this...? Is she still maintaining the nasty humans of the RAF shot down her 'friendly aliens' in cold blood despite all the evidence to the contrary that this was simply a military exercise...?
Thanks, as I feared. Unfortunately she has a rather simplistic viewpoint: RAF planes + strange lights in sky + distant explosion = horrible humans waging war on friendly spacefaring aliens.Yes, I'm afraid I listened to half an hour or so yesterday, that was all I could stomach. I found it extremely self indulgent and childish. I'll be sticking to 'Talking Till Dawn' from now on.
It was just awful.Thanks, as I feared. Unfortunately she has a rather simplistic viewpoint: RAF planes + strange lights in sky + distant explosion = horrible humans waging war on friendly spacefaring aliens.
My great fear is that in about ten years time it will become the 'new Rendlesham'It was just awful.
*bump*
Caz Clarke talks to Paul Sinclair:
I know what I think but make your own minds up...
True. It also demonstrates how someone can keep evolving the narrative in spite of the overwhelming evidence they were clearly mistaken: its folklore in the makingI think the fact it's obviously related to a (quite normal) military exercise is actually quite instructive when looking at other cases, particularly cases in Wales where the military tends to get up to a lot more (Pembrokeshire Triangle, I'm looking at you).
I found this when I worked in hospitality. I was lucky to work in some decent places and so complaints weren't commonplace but when something did go wrong, it was interesting to note that the customer would almost always exaggerate to justify their complaint, e.g. "we have been sat her for 50 minutes" when we had only opened the doors 25 minutes beforehand...You see embellishment quite a lot with witnesses: it's not necessarily malicious, more an artefact of the way someone naturally responds when faced with disbelief and / or ridicule, as witnesses often are. They try and strengthen their story, perhaps even subconsciously.
Just as typical is the way these small UFO groups often dissolve in infighting and wild accusations; very strange.
I think it's an artefact of being human. Telling a story of whatever, a ghostly sighting, a UFO, any kind of encounter, means that we try to form it into a narrative almost automatically. So there's always a certain amount of build up ('why I was in the area/looking at the sky etc') and then the climax - the ghostly appearance, the lights in the sky. Embellishment is necessary to keep the narrative going.You see embellishment quite a lot with witnesses: it's not necessarily malicious, more an artefact of the way someone naturally responds when faced with disbelief and / or ridicule, as witnesses often are. They try and strengthen their story, perhaps even subconsciously.
Just as typical is the way these small UFO groups often dissolve in infighting and wild accusations; very strange.
I found this when I worked in hospitality. I was lucky to work in some decent places and so complaints weren't commonplace but when something did go wrong, it was interesting to note that the customer would almost always exaggerate to justify their complaint, e.g. "we have been sat her for 50 minutes" when we had only opened the doors 25 minutes beforehand...
One might argue that - with notable exceptions - those people who join UFO groups didn't have the greatest social skills to begin with...