A
Anonymous
Guest
Some people argue that the whole flood / Atlantis et al mythos can be attributed to a star going supernova in the constellation of Vela.
About 1,500 years after this explosion, remnants of the supernova, let's call it Phaeton, came tear-assing through our solar system. During it's trail blazing odyssey it pulled two moons from their exisiting orbits, destroyed a planet between Jupiter and Mars - known as "Tiamat" to some ancients, and finally whizzed past us and into the Sun.
During it's whizzing, our green and pleasant land got the proverbial bum's rush, with your commensurate lightning storms, polar shifts, super volcanism and whatnot. This in fact has led to many geological anomalies being discovered here on Terra, and can also explain the asteroid belt and the eccentric orbit of Pluto yada yada yada
Seems to me to be the perfect mixture of damned data, just right for orthodox science to dismissively cock a snoot at.
Anyone else thought about this scenario? Got any pro's / con's??
About 1,500 years after this explosion, remnants of the supernova, let's call it Phaeton, came tear-assing through our solar system. During it's trail blazing odyssey it pulled two moons from their exisiting orbits, destroyed a planet between Jupiter and Mars - known as "Tiamat" to some ancients, and finally whizzed past us and into the Sun.
During it's whizzing, our green and pleasant land got the proverbial bum's rush, with your commensurate lightning storms, polar shifts, super volcanism and whatnot. This in fact has led to many geological anomalies being discovered here on Terra, and can also explain the asteroid belt and the eccentric orbit of Pluto yada yada yada
Seems to me to be the perfect mixture of damned data, just right for orthodox science to dismissively cock a snoot at.
Anyone else thought about this scenario? Got any pro's / con's??