comments on twisters and torndaoes
To all:
I am aware of the bad mouthing and lambasting I will be opening myself to, if I invoke the idea of chemtrails, with respect to mattjdarkstar's seeing a dust devil on Datmoor, but altering the weather does seem an effect of chemtrailing. Hallybods asserts that "they say that Britain experiences about 50 twisters a year", however, it should be borne in mind that, just because what are termed "official sources" may make a statement, doesn't mean that it must be true. Or, if it is true, that it should be true!
In the U.S., for example, they seem to have everything they could to make people believe that tornadoes can occur anywhere. This is important to quiet any suspicion about the evident ubiquity of the storms, in recent years. It used to be accepted that essentially flat, unbroken land was necessary for tornadoes to form. The understanding of the nature of tornadoes was hinged on this. Hilly, overly rocky, rough terrain was felt to interfere with the winds that created tornadoes. And this was accepted because, until only a short while ago, tornadoes did only occur on flat land! Since the late Seventies, however, tornadoes have been reported in the uneven, rugged terrain of the Appalachians, and the East Coast. And, so, to avoid the acceptance that the weather may have become perverted, it was quietly asserted "officially" that this is perfectly normal!
And the concept of storm "supercells", to "explain" the occurrence of, frankly, apparently utterly abnormal tornadoes, was invented!
It has become evident to me that a purpose of chemtrails may have been the large-scale introduction of a substance into the atmosphere, likely a volatile, with a lower thermal inertia than water, to augment, or even take the place of, water, in meteorological processes! Don't forget, water, itself, is not theoretically crucial to "weather", just the behavior of something that can motivate the movement of air masses! Something that rises readily into the upper atmosphere will draw in air masses, by suction. Something that releases energy quickly, by condensing out more quickly than water, will provide the energy for artificial storms!
Nay-sayers may try to insist that there was no chemtrail activity indicated, and that the dust devil on Dartmoor an isolated incident, and, so should not be taken to be a sign of chemtrail activity. But it does appear to be anomalous, and the anomalous, likely, has at least some connection with something else anomalous! And, for all that "skeptics" or "debunkers" may try to say that a single twister on the moors is too little to ascribe to chemtrails, a point mattjdarkstar made comes out, namely, that it was "dusty". To be sure, I have never known the moor areas of England to be particularly dry and dusty, but, even if someone may try to say they are, the description of Dartmoor being "dusty" evokes memories of the frankly anomalous 100 degree heat wave of last year!
Divorcing this from weird weather would be difficult, at best!
Those intent on discrediting what I say with respect to chemtrails, incidentally, will be quick to point out the generally accepted assertion that the appearance of chemtrails, en masse, began around 1997. But, in fact, this only indicates an evidently eminently pernicious quality of the matter. It appears that the introduction of foreign substances into the atmosphere, to influence weather and permit weather control, seems to have been ongoing for some time now! Indeed, it may extend back to the late Seventies, or even earlier! The onslaught of hordes of persistent lines in the sky in 1997 may not mark the start of the project, but, rather, may be the indication of the date when the level of abnormal materials in the atmosphere reached saturation! Spreading more substance, now, may produce lines because it's difficult for new material to disperse, since there's already so much of it there!
And, yes, it is unusual, to the point of being abnormal, for tornadoes to form east of the Mississippi! Certainly, New Jersey never saw anything like the threat of tornadoes that is claimed, these days! Normal, water impelled tornadoes may be impossible in the terrain of New Jersey, but something created by a more powerfully acting material may not be! Again, "Debunkers", "skeptics" and nay-sayers may try one of their tricks to confuse the issue, namely questioning my understanding of the subject, or my familiarity with the truth. They will "inform" me that there have always been scores of tornadoes, every year, in New Jersey.
Below is a picture I took in early May, in Grover Cleveland Park, in Caldwell, New Jersey, looking roughly south or southeast, more or less toward West Orange. It has the characteristic appearance of a nascent tornado cloud. It even seems to have two tiny spiral spikes, sticking out of it. This never formed a full tornado, though. In fact, in, apparently, only a few minutes, it shrunk in size. But it does demonstrate a point.
If tornadoes were as reliable an occurrence as "debunkers" and nay-sayers may try to depict them as, then a city like West Orange would never have developed into the highly populated, highly constructed community that it is! With buildings being torn down, every year, there would be no point in turning it, or Newark, or South Orange, or Maplewood, or Summit, or Union into such urbanized spots! "Skeptics" may take issue with the assertion that normal tornadoes would not form around rugged terrain, but, in the end, places regularly assaulted by tornadoes would not be likely to become such highly developed urban centers! A map of the most urbanized areas of the United States, in fact, very closely seems to match the areas traditionally considered immune to tornadoes!
The fact that New Jersey is as developed as it is indicates that tornadoes never used to form here! And that only indicates the evident wholesale abnormality of tornadoes east of the Mississippi, and, likely, the twister on Dartmoor, as well.
Julian Penrod