Some 70 years of striving for proof and still none?
And despite such sheer incompetence, you are still in a job?
No... in all seriousness, it doesn't work like that.
I have eventually managed to upload 50 of the 200+ 'triangular UFO' reports I acquired with permission from the NUFORC some 20 years ago, with stated intention of evidencing a snapshot of that specific aspect of our UFO enigma.
The point being that none could be explained as a misunderstanding re, 'flying saucers', or stars, or anything which typically came to mind as a rational explanation, especially so, 'stealth aircraft'... made no sense given the accounts.
They are now online at:
www.forteanmedia.com/TR001.pdf
until:
www.forteanmedia.com/TR050.pdf
@feinman and myself share the intrigue, we differ on whether any evidence of ET involvement has been kept secret.
If it hasn't, then innocent people are being accused of heinous acts and that's surely unacceptable.
That stated, all I perhaps have to offer is that seemingly inexplicable snapshot.
And this.
Why?
Because I know the background and it's a judgement call.
Same as everyone else's on the subject.
This ticks all the boxes, a commissioned painting by a witness who I know was in such a senior position (think deputy District Attorney) he could never go public.
'Well, Scott, the interview panel believes we are about to make an imminent promotion appointment. Is there anything you would like to add?'.
'No... except did I tell you about the gigantic triangular UFO which silently came towards my car and then hovered over it, before departing at lightning speed'?
'Scott, we'll...erm...let you know our decision in due course'.
When I shortly upload the other 150, contemporary accounts and confirm, does that actually make any difference?
May I suggest it's a significantly further true reflection on matters?
There was a UK documentary, 'Billion Dollar Secrets', broadcast in 1999.
It featured research into US 'black budget' programmes which was undertaken by Nick Cook, a British aviation journalist and correspondent for 'Jane's Defence Weekly'.
The following is a transcript of discussions between Nick Cook (NC) and Lt. Gen. George Muellner (GM):
NC: General, I've just spent a couple of days in Southern Colorado, where a lot of apparently credible witnesses are reporting sightings of apparently unconventional aircraft, and I mean things like huge black triangles, silent helicopters, all kinds of extraordinary craft.
Should we be looking to the USAF for whatever is going on in this place?
GM: Well, the only programmes that I'm aware of that we have operating out in that environment... obviously are 117s operate out of Holloman... they're triangular shaped, obviously they're black and they operate at night quite frequently and so on.
All of the rest of the aeroplanes we have operating down in the Holloman area in particular are all conventional airplanes.
So, I don't know of any other development programmes or anything else that's going on down in that area or in southern Colorado in general, or for that matter in the New Mexico area.
We don't have anything of significance operating there.
I can tell you as an aviator though, quite frequently it's very, very difficult to discern what a platform is. B-2 for instance, if you're looking near co-altitude with it, it just seems to disappear into the background.
NC: But again, these people are describing things that literally hover over them sometimes, seemingly unmistakable sightings of these things.
GM: Well, I'll tell you, if they can get me the name of the contractor and whosoever operating, I'd love to put them under contract to develop some of these things.
(End)
UFOs are real.
There's no need for a cover-up scenario because they are intangible.