Hopefully it does. "Flying Saucer" like "Airship" was kind of a catchall term for a variety of different phenomena, from objects that appear to be made of programmable matter to structured craft of all sizes. Arnold's objects are similar to many others, though I wish he would have been more outspoken after all of the incorrect renderings were circulated.
You are gasping at straws in faint hope of survival.
Kenneth Arnold categorically emphasised never having observed anything like a flying saucer:
His utterly misconstrued report is the genesis of flying saucers.
It's chasing rainbows.
The difficulty, as with any heartfelt belief, whether religious or otherwise, is accepting being wrong all along.
There's more to the UFO phenomenon than what couldn't imaginably be a more specious foundation as flying saucers.
I have tried my best to evidence same and I will not allow you to keep steering in the wrong bloody direction.
Your passion is something close to my own and the efforts I so recognise.
Should you differ, please sail on and make sure to check out all four corners.
In search of flying saucers, you're just wasting your time, though.
Remove the saucers from your eyes and a whole world of research opportunities appear.