ufo's

[Beakmoo]

Just wondering what's the general spread of opinion on this board.

 

[river_styx]

Actually the more I read about them the more I'm convinced they come from some point in the future, maybe a very distant future that they are trying to alter in some way?

 

[Anonymous]

Shouldn't this go in the ufology section?

You should add in 'natural phenonema'. That's what I would probably go for.

 

[augustverango]

There isn't one theory alone that can explain all UFOs and their related phenomena. Most people who have a theory try to tie up every UFO case since in history (and sometimes anything else that's slightly odd) into their idea of what UFOs are. But to me it just isn't like that. UFOs aren't simply one thing.

 

[Beakmoo]

Shouldn't this go in the ufology section?

yes, but I thought if I put it in here, more people would notice it. I never go near the ufology section. Illogical, but that was my thinking at the time.
I knew I'd forget something. The future, of course

 

[Anonymous]

90%+ misidentifications

The rest, a combination of as yet not understood natural phenomena, probably geophysical, and psychological events.

 

[Beakmoo]

I've put this into the ufology section now as suggested. I haven't deleted this one, somehow it seemed rude

 

[carole]

Seeing the poll results just goes to prove what a truly fortean lot we all are!



Carole

 

[J_Frank_Parnell]

if aliens exist, they are by, er, nature, er, natural phenomena.

i go for all of the above.