(...)
Men were accused of witchcraft in the 16th and 17th Centuries, but figures suggest only 10 to 30% suspects were men.
(...)
I am currently reading a newly published book on the "Louis de Gaufridy" sorcery case in Southern France. A note in this book underlines the fact that in most parts of France, there were more documented cases of male witches than female witches. In the territory of the Parliament of Paris (the judiciary district covering roughly half of France, around the capital), more than 50% of condemned witches were male. In the Parliament of Rouen, the proportion of convicted males even reached 70%. This data contrasts heavily with the profile of British, German or Scandinavian witches, which were predominantly women. I wonder what were the figures in Italy and Spain, in the 16th and 17th century.
No explanation is given for these national contrasts. So we are left to wonder why in such and such country females were the usual suspects, while in other areas, suspicion predominantly fell on males.
Wasn't it a matter of religion ? In terms of number of convictions, it appears that the witch hunt was much fiercer in the Northern countries than in the South (contrary to what later Romanticists would claim). So protestantism might have played a role as a "reformist" religion aiming at the revival of a purer model of christianity. As in many "purification drives" along the world (in other religions), women might have been targeted because they were thought to be "temptresses" (
as it is still the case in modern day countries where they are requested to cover their hair and stay at home - not doing so deserving them insults such as "you're immodest" or even beatings]).
"History is written by the victor", so I guess the way the history of the witch hunts was initially written may have put all the blame of the Catholic Holy Inquisition and presented protestantism a mild, beneficial evolution as opposed to the corruption of the Roman world. Yet, it suffices to compare a description of rural life in the Western Isles of Scotland before (see Martin Martin's accounts) and after the establishment of protestantism to measure the impact of the reformist faith on the development of extreme puritanism. In a couple of centuries, we pass from abundant festivals were the faithful drink and dance to their fill to a strict observance of the sabath ...
On the other hand, the Catholic world was split between ageless tradition and its own reformist drive aimed at facing the challenge of protestantism. So although there was also a hunt for "deviants", old practices were still aknowledged, especially the fact that medieval magic and conjuring was predominantly a clerical practice. Priests being males, when sorcery was to be considered, they remained a prime vehicle for witchcraft. Then it was up to who got the upper hand in the power struggles within the Church : traditionalists would just let "sorcerers" be (that's how the Frioulan "Benandanti" were handled by the Italian inquisition : none of them was executed ), while hardcore tridentine reformists would sue.
The Louis de Gaufridy's case rather supports this hypothesis as he was himself a priest. His case was judged by a militant reformist priest (Michaelis) while his bishop instead tried to protect him. So we can see the tension between diverging postures within the Catholic Church.
A second factor which might explain the North / South difference in scope and gender-focus may be "precedence". It may be that the first reported cases contributed to define what was then expected to be a witch in every country. And once the model was set, subsequent cases would be oriented towards this model.
In France, it appears that early documented witch trials focused on men. The Carroi de Marlou's trial, in the 1580s, is a prime example of this, four to five men (common folks) being convicted for only one old lady. Later on, the Gaudridy case focused on a priest seducing young girls in a monastic community. The case of Urbain Grandier at Loudun reproduces almost exactly the same model : again it is a priest leading young girls astray. And in the case of the possessions of Louviers, again a love affair between a priest and nuns is pivotal ... Thanks to the development of printing, these stories were largely broadcasted. That may have shaped peoples' attitudes towards what was to be expected of sorcery cases, which in turn tended to reinforce national trends in terms of gender positionning of witches / warlocks.
That's my hypothesis, but I might be deluded by the devil and the Pope !
*** edit : additional possible explanation ***
Ritual language might also have played its part : while the Catholics kept using Latin, in Protestant countries, the Bible was translated into the national language. Depending on the translation (translation is always a betrayal), it might have encouraged a harsher stance towards "magicians" ...