EricJulien
Ephemeral Spectre
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2017
- Messages
- 335
so that it might devour her child the moment he was born:
Prince William welcomed his boy as a Prince of the British monarchy, even before giving him a name which was announced two days later. So, the word 'devour' is not negative but expresses the idea that William followed a secular royal tradition to make George a Prince of his House before even being a human, not even a citizen (the royals don't vote).
She gave birth to a son, a male child, who "will rule all the nations with an iron scepter.":
After the description of the MOTHER, after the description of the FATHER, here is the description of the SON. His only characteristic is his future role: a MIGTHY RULER of the entire WORLD.
And her child was snatched up to God and to his throne:
in addition to the fact that he is divine (who goes to God and his throne?), this part says us that the Male Child will be abducted by the benevolent ETs (angels of God) to be merged with Christ, like Jesus experienced it at his baptism (note that only Jesus could have described what he lived at that moment, hence the lack of details in the Scriptures for he didn't tell anything about this very moment...except that he 'suddenly' was the SON of GOD).
So, this verse matches what I announce: an impending major UFO event. Note that on July 22 2017, Prince George was 4. Is the proximity of the birth of the Male Child and the rapture (that is to say in the same verse) due to the same period (less than three months) this rapture could take place? Will his fourth anniversary remind us the four Horsemen starting with the WHITE RIDER, that is to say Christ returned?
The woman fled into the wilderness to a place prepared for her by God, where she might be taken care of for 1,260 days:
This verse comes just after the topic of the Male Child's rapture, that is to say four years after the birth. Could this announce the rapture of the woman, Kate, the same moment, to go to a place prepared by God...to whom Prince George will pay a 'visit' on his throne? Note that these 1,260 days echoe the 1,260 days of the Two Witnesses in the preceding chapter. We saw that the Two Witnesses are the future Prince William and Princess Catherine (Kate). We just saw that the woman (MOTHER) and the red dragon (FATHER) are also Prince William and Princess Catherine. Isn't it the best proof of the SOUL SWITCH I spoke about?
So, Prince Charles won't be king since the 7th head / 10th horn comes after George VI, aka Prince William as father of Christ!
The problem with the red dragon is that there is an usual mix between the British monarchy symbols without any negativity per se (or rather the lineage of princes of Wales then becoming kings of UK, both having the same figures (lion and unicorn)) and the antichrist rising from it. So, Bible scholars commonly see the red dragon as evil, as if the whole dynasty was evil, what is wrong basically since the Two Witnesses and Christ are 'from' it too, as already showed.
In other words, one must forget this meme and objectively see the British royal coat of Arms (including those of the Wales) as a simple support to define the country and the figures. Remember that John has visions. He doesn't judge them. But we do it too fast. It takes a great intellectual effort to 'unlearn' our wrong assumptions and false beliefs.
Prince William welcomed his boy as a Prince of the British monarchy, even before giving him a name which was announced two days later. So, the word 'devour' is not negative but expresses the idea that William followed a secular royal tradition to make George a Prince of his House before even being a human, not even a citizen (the royals don't vote).
She gave birth to a son, a male child, who "will rule all the nations with an iron scepter.":
After the description of the MOTHER, after the description of the FATHER, here is the description of the SON. His only characteristic is his future role: a MIGTHY RULER of the entire WORLD.
And her child was snatched up to God and to his throne:
in addition to the fact that he is divine (who goes to God and his throne?), this part says us that the Male Child will be abducted by the benevolent ETs (angels of God) to be merged with Christ, like Jesus experienced it at his baptism (note that only Jesus could have described what he lived at that moment, hence the lack of details in the Scriptures for he didn't tell anything about this very moment...except that he 'suddenly' was the SON of GOD).
So, this verse matches what I announce: an impending major UFO event. Note that on July 22 2017, Prince George was 4. Is the proximity of the birth of the Male Child and the rapture (that is to say in the same verse) due to the same period (less than three months) this rapture could take place? Will his fourth anniversary remind us the four Horsemen starting with the WHITE RIDER, that is to say Christ returned?
The woman fled into the wilderness to a place prepared for her by God, where she might be taken care of for 1,260 days:
This verse comes just after the topic of the Male Child's rapture, that is to say four years after the birth. Could this announce the rapture of the woman, Kate, the same moment, to go to a place prepared by God...to whom Prince George will pay a 'visit' on his throne? Note that these 1,260 days echoe the 1,260 days of the Two Witnesses in the preceding chapter. We saw that the Two Witnesses are the future Prince William and Princess Catherine (Kate). We just saw that the woman (MOTHER) and the red dragon (FATHER) are also Prince William and Princess Catherine. Isn't it the best proof of the SOUL SWITCH I spoke about?
So, Prince Charles won't be king since the 7th head / 10th horn comes after George VI, aka Prince William as father of Christ!
The problem with the red dragon is that there is an usual mix between the British monarchy symbols without any negativity per se (or rather the lineage of princes of Wales then becoming kings of UK, both having the same figures (lion and unicorn)) and the antichrist rising from it. So, Bible scholars commonly see the red dragon as evil, as if the whole dynasty was evil, what is wrong basically since the Two Witnesses and Christ are 'from' it too, as already showed.
In other words, one must forget this meme and objectively see the British royal coat of Arms (including those of the Wales) as a simple support to define the country and the figures. Remember that John has visions. He doesn't judge them. But we do it too fast. It takes a great intellectual effort to 'unlearn' our wrong assumptions and false beliefs.
Last edited: