• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

maximus otter

Recovering policeman
Joined
Aug 9, 2001
Messages
13,987
Declassified government files have revealed how Ministry of Defence (MoD) officials launched a top-level probe into a diamond shaped aircraft seen hovering above a Scottish village.

Officials were so alarmed by the object, which was captured on camera, that they broke with established procedures and referred the sighting to ministers.

They also overrode rules prohibiting investigations into UFO sightings not considered an immediate threat to national security, and spent more than a year trying to crack the still unexplained mystery.

The disclosure about the incident is contained in more than 1,000 pages of official documentation, detailing hundreds of UFO sightings between 1987 and 1993, which has been made available publicly at the National Archives in Kew for the first time today.

Their release comes at a time of increased reports of UFO activity in Britain.

Figures obtained by The Sunday Telegraph show that sightings for the first two months of 2009 have been higher than for any year for which records are publicly available, and are three times higher than the normal monthly average.

Most of the UFO "sightings" contained in the national archives were ultimately explained away. But the Scottish event still remains a mystery.

According to the files, the Ministry of Defence first became aware of the existence of the craft when the Daily Record newspaper presented it with six colour photographs of the object. The UFO seen by two men, one of whom captured it on camera, as it hovered in daylight near the A9, at Calvine, north of Pitlochry, on August 4, 1990.

The witnesses said it hovered for about 10 minutes – during which time military aircraft were also seen making a series of low-level passes – before moving upwards, out of sight, at great speed.

The files show that officials established from the photographs that the military craft were Harrier jets even though, intriguingly, none were operational in the area at the time.

An MoD minute prepared for the then Armed Forces Minister, Sir Archie Hamilton, and dated September 14, 1990 states: "Under Secretary of State (Armed Forces) may wish to be aware that the Scottish Daily Record may run a story regarding an alleged sighting of a UFO near Pitlochrie [sic] in early August. Such stories are not normally drawn to the attention of Ministers and the MoD press office invariably responds to questions along well-established lines emphasising our limited interest in the UFO phenomenon and explaining that we therefore do not have the resources to undertake any in-depth investigations into particular sightings.

"They [the photographs] show a large stationary, diamond-shaped object past which, it appears, a small jet aircraft is flying. The negatives have been considered by the relevant staff who have established that the jet aircraft is a Harrier (and also identified a barely visible second aircraft, again probably a Harrier) but have reached no definite conclusion regarding the large object."

The MoD even prepared a defensive media strategy in the event that journalists should bombard its press office with questions about the craft.

Journalists who quizzed the department were to be told that "no definite conclusions have been reached regarding the large diamond shaped object".

However, the Daily Record did not run the pictures.

Dr David Clarke, a university journalism lecturer and UFO expert, said: "This is the most tantalising of all the UFO reports. This shows how the MoD was worried about what the hell they were going to say. They had no idea what it was. They couldn't even identify where the Harriers had come from. It is a real mystery. It is one that can't be explained. They took it very, very seriously."

The files show that a year after the original photographs were taken, the MoD tasked experts to produce line drawings of the UFO which would give officials an idea of scale.

Even the creation of the drawings was shrouded in strict secrecy. One undated document suggests "very special handling" because of "sensitivity of the material". It also orders "minimum handling by listed personnel".

In 1992, rumours emerged in the press that the Americans were developing a new spy plane code-named Aurora, and officials wondered whether the mystery craft could have been part of the project.

A note in an undated file states: "Notwithstanding US denials the Aurora story continues to run. The details in this article tie in with some of the things being talked about at last month's UFO conference. I'm not looking forward to the Scottish Daily Record remembering they've got photos of a diamond -shaped UFO taken near Pitlochry in 1990 – the object having been stationary."

The files show that MoD officials regarded many of the sightings reported during the period as being made by credible and genuine witnesses.

Military personnel, police officers and flight crews are among those who have reported UFO activity.

Even a Brighton man who claims to have had an encounter with aliens outside his front window in 1992 is described as "sounding genuine".

An MoD official notes: "Caller sounded genuine enough and his main concern seemed to be that he didn't want to talk too much about the craft if it was one of ours."

The files also show that officials had planned to study systematically a sample of more than 100 unexplained sightings in the hope that they might be able to provide a rational explanation of what was happening. But defence chiefs subsequently blocked the move for fear it would be a public relations disaster.

UFO sightings recorded in the newly-disclosed Ministry of Defence files include:

February 21, 1988: Helicopter crew reports a close night-time encounter with a very bright flashing light. The UFO appears to be 200 or 300 yards long with red and white lights, and appears to swerve to miss the helicopter.

November 5, 1990: Crews of six RAF Tornado jets report being over taken by a giant UFO whilst flying over Germany during an exercise. The pilots believe this could have been a test flight for the then top-secret US Air Force Stealth fighter. A file notes: “I believe any further information made available would only add fuel to the fire. Clearly the incident happened and clearly the pilots saw what they believe (with hindsight) to be a stealth aircraft. I doubt very much if the USAF or even the Soviet air force (if they were flying) would admit to anything.”

May 1, 1992: Crew of a Britannia 737 jet report a near miss with an object travelling at Mach 3 near Elba, off the Italian Coast. A memo notes: “The Civil Aviation Authority believe this may be characteristic of a radar-guided missile. They have not taken any action but would be prepared to contact Italian civil aviation authorities if MoD believe the object was indeed likely to have been a missile.”

June 17, 1992: Flight crew report that four passengers on board a flight leaving Gatwick Airport claimed to have seen a UFO flying level with the plane. The flight crew do not see it, but in a submission to the MoD one states: “I do not believe that the passengers made the story up as they appeared concerned by the sighting and insisted on notifying us before disembarking.”

In November 1992 a Brighton man reported seeing a brightly lit object, possibly an alien craft, hovering above his house. Officials noted that the caller “sounded genuine enough”. They added “His main concern seemed to be that he didn’t want to talk too much about the craft if it was one of ours that we wanted to keep secret.”

March 23, 1993: A “bright cigar-shaped object” is seen above Ilford and Romford, in east London - but the mystery is soon solved. The file says: “Witnesses have reported a bright cigar-shaped object, moving very slowly and making little or no sound. The object almost certainly responsible for these sightings is a brightly illuminated airship. This craft is operated by and is advertising the new Ford Mondeo. The CAA has confirmed that this airship has been operating over London and the surrounding area.”

March 31, 1993: More than 100 people in the West Country and Ireland report seeing two brilliant objects with bright vapour trails flying North to South quickly and silently across the night sky - an episode now known to Ufologists as the Cosford Incident. Officials say some of the sightings may have a been a Russian Cosmos satellite re-entering Earth’s atmosphere, but cannot explain away the sightings entirely. An official notes: “Personally I agree that while the decay of Cosmos 2238 might explain the high level 1.10am sightings, it would not explain the other sightings in the night in question.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...ent-probed-Britains-greatest-UFO-mystery.html

maximus otter
 
Are there any pics of the diamond shaped object anywhere?, the article only shows a drawing.
 
Fixed Maximus original link, above. P_M
Ronson8 said:
Are there any pics of the diamond shaped object anywhere?, the article only shows a drawing.
Or is it a really poor nth generation photocopy of an original photo?

Anyway, it's obviously the planet Venus mating with a weather balloon. ;)

Or, could it be some sort of stealth bomber, taken in silhouette? The picture really is very hard to make out.
 
It'd be interesting to see the Daily Record's colour photos that is a really rubbish photocopy.
 
Re: Revealed: How government probed UK's greatest UFO myster

maximus_otter said:
officials established from the photographs that the military craft were Harrier jets even though, intriguingly, none were operational in the area at the time...

"They couldn't even identify where the Harriers had come from.
maximus otter

I love that they couldn't identify the harriers - very enigmatic. I would have thought that would have been the easiest part, surely all their flights are logged.

Unless, of course, they came from a deeper classified source or from some other country. Or maybe they were part of the phenomenon itself!
 
You're assuming that the blokes who took the pictures actually gave the right date And IIRC the only people who flew Harriers were the RAF, the Royal Navy, US Marines and the Spanish airforce, So it's highly unlikely that they belonged to anyone other than the RAF or RN.
 
Ah very true. Probably the Spanish then. ;)
 
Although the photocopy is of impossibly crap quality it is reminiscent of those camera diaphragm images, where a bright object, highly zoomed in reflects the shape of the camera's diaphragm. The fact that the harrier is a good size suggests that the camera was at a reasonably high zoom at least
 
If the MOD are correct about there being no Harriers in the district at that time, that proves that the picture cannot have been taken on that date. It throws the whole story into disrepute.

Unfortunately you can't always be sure that the MOD have read their own records correctly; not because they are trying to cover anything up, but simply because they have made a mistake. The USAF have made plenty of mistakes like this in the past - look at the Phoenix and Stephenville sightings, both of which involved US jets which no-one seemed to know anything about.
 
The story by Nick Pope has some holes in it too. Despite the presence of a Harrier in the (now lost) photo, no Harrier was in the air that day, and no Harrier pilot has ever reported seeing anything like that near his (or her) plane. The M.O.D. would have been very aware of this, but instead they regarded the photo as a great mystery. They didn't hide the evidence either - instead they pinned it up on the wall in their office. Not the actions of a secretive military-industrial complex. More the actions of a bunch of amused Ministry desk-pushers.

So either the Harrier was piloted by aliens, or the photo was a fake. I know where my money lies.
 
I also thought Pope's story was odd; it was almost like they were trying to gauge the reaction of some folks in the MOD to such a photograph --it doesn't seem like something that would be done, but after what I've seen go on these days, anything is really possible, sadly. I only included it because it looks like it could be a large object composed of two pyramids with their bases touching. But I don't have an opinion on the veracity of Pope's story; sometimes I think he might be an unwitting tool.
 
Government bans release of secret UFO dossier for another 50 years leaving experts furious

thesun.co.uk/news/12892883/secret-ufo-sightings-dossier-stay-hidden/
Link is dead. The MIA article can be accessed via the Wayback Machine:
https://web.archive.org/web/2020101...883/secret-ufo-sightings-dossier-stay-hidden/

Here is an extended excerpt from the article ...


THE JOX FILES Government bans release of secret UFO dossier for another 50 years leaving experts furious
Paul Sims

9 Oct 2020, 21:30

UFO experts hit out when it emerged a dossier into Britain’s most significant sighting is to be kept secret for another 50 years.

The file is said to contain astonishing colour photographs of a 100ft craft hovering over the village of Calvine in the Scottish Highlands in 1990.

NINTCHDBPICT000613285618-1.jpg
A colourised image of the alleged UFO sighting in 1990

A 30-year rule meant it was due to be declassified on January 1 — but the Ministry of Defence has now blocked release until 2072 without explanation.

Photographs were taken by two Perthshire hikers who watched the “diamond-shaped metallic craft” for ten minutes before it shot up vertically out of sight.

They also claimed to see military jets fly a series of low-level passes. ...

Evidence collected and held on to by officials included the hikers’ six colour snaps.

A redacted version of the file has been released, including just a blurred photocopied image.

UFO investigator Nick Pope helped colourise the image, seen above.

Last night, Mr Pope said: “Despite an extensive investigation, we never found a definitive explanation for what was seen at Calvine.”

A UFO hunter added: “This is all so frustrating. The Calvine Incident is one of the most intriguing of all the UFO mysteries from that period.

“Under the 30-year rule, the file should have been released on January 1 2021, but if the ministry get their way it won’t be released until January 1 2072 — an 82-year closure.

“By the time the world gets to see the file, the two witnesses will be dead. It is crazy. What are the authorities trying to hide?”

The redacted file also omitted the names and contact details of the hikers. ...
FULL STORY: https://web.archive.org/web/2020101...883/secret-ufo-sightings-dossier-stay-hidden/


I think the case mentioned occurred only 53.4 miles from the MacDonald encounter.
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Ros...1e9278a!2m2!1d-3.966186!2d56.768201!3e0?hl=en
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As an indiviual who has dabbled in Archival practice, I am baffled.

Unless it has personal information, (and individuals or relatives have requested privacy,) then this is problematic this day and age.
 
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords!
It's not like we can do anything about it, and at least it's not new and doesn't just destroy us in an instant. The strategy and tactics for long-term contact so as not to cause a tipping point, is interesting.
 
The photo does not look right to me.
The size of the craft relative to each other and the landscape does not seem right.

Also, and I ask this rather than know this, but how easy or hard is it to snap a military jet in flight in a scenario such as above?
1990, so am guessing 35 mm small SLR camera?

All that considered, especially with that photo in the public domain, keeping report this hidden from the public for many more years seems is probably troubling, unless it is related to details of the jets's activities which need to be kept secret i.e.e they were involved in something linked to nuclear or anti-terrorist activities?
 
The photo does not look right to me.
The size of the craft relative to each other and the landscape does not seem right. ...

Your sense of unease is justified, because that's not one of the hikers' photos. It's one of multiple photo mock-ups created by the press and media to illustrate news stories and TV reports about the sighting. These mock-ups were all based on the sketchy descriptions given in news stories and derivative documentation. In other words, they're all artists' conceptions imagined from hearsay.

As the (relatively few) substantial news stories all state, the original photos and negatives were submitted to military / intelligence authorities who then sequestered and classified them.
 
This may have happened to protect the original photographers from harassment. If the original photos were fakes (as I suspect) then they don't really deserve protection. These photos also include Harrier jump jets, were not in the air that day; so the event was a complete fabrication.
 
Last edited:
Here's David Clarke on the subject, who is slightly more open-minded on the case than I am.
https://drdavidclarke.co.uk/2018/06/16/black-projects-ufos-and-the-mysterious-mo-d-notice/
A second mysterious incident, four years earlier, may also reveal the hidden hand of the censors. In August 1990 the Scottish Daily Record in Glasgow were sent six colour slides showing a large diamond-shaped UFO that had been taken by two men walking near the A9 at Calvine in Perthshire.Desk officers suspected the image might show a USAF black project aircraft, perhaps the fabled Aurora. They sent the images to JARIC, the RAF’s specialist photographic analysis agency. Experts there identified two Harrier jets flying alongside the mysterious object. But surprisingly, inquiries failed to trace the Harriers. The MoD say none were flying at the time of the incident.
A one-page ‘defensive Press briefing’ was prepared by the UFO desk officer Owen Hartop. This was an unusual step as the MoD rarely prepared media briefings on individual UFO cases. Hartop clearly expected the story to break in the national media. But inexplicably, the Daily Record did not publish the story. This omission has never been explained by the editors of the Trinity Mirror-owned title.
In 2009 I made informal inquiries with the picture editor and librarian of the newspaper who I expected would remember the striking photographs arriving at the paper. But there was no recollection whatsoever of the event or how the story came to be spiked. This struck me – and them – as very odd indeed.
Soon after the negatives were sent to MoD in 1990 the trail goes cold and the original images have vanished – never to be seen again. Despite national publicity the photographer has never come forward either to explain what happened.
But a UFO file released in 2009 shows the MoD’s Defence Intelligence Staff still possessed prints of the photographs two years after they were received from the Daily Record.
...
The only surviving evidence of the Calvine UFO is a poor photocopy of one of the original prints that appears in one of the DIS UFO files.
I cannot prove the MoD used a D-Notice in the Calvine incident. Neither am I convinced the photographs show ‘Aurora’, if such a craft ever existed. But it may well show some other experimental aircraft, British or American in origin.
What I cannot explain is why the Daily Record did not run the story. Furthermore, neither can the Daily Record…
 
Yes, that picture looks like shit, but it is the only evidence we now have. The photo in the Sun article is a reconstruction.
 
“The only surviving evidence of the Calvine UFO is a poor photocopy of one of the original prints that appears in one of the DIS UFO files.” ...
Yes, that picture looks like shit, but it is the only evidence we now have. The photo in the Sun article is a reconstruction.

There's another possible interpretation of the poor quality photo (-copy).

Clarke (and others) claimed the original photographic evidence showed two aircraft identified as Harriers. Only one (alleged) Harrier is visible in the sole purported surviving photo image.

If the mystery object had been a highly classified aircraft there's no way a photo image of it would be placed, much less survive, in a case file any civilian could access. Otherwise, the case file itself would have been - and remained - highly classified.

The only way that photo image could be retained in a low- or un-classified file, much less released to a civilian, would be if it had been redacted.

What if the big black diamond shape on the photocopied image is a redaction - i.e., a shape drawn upon an original photo print to obscure the mystery object and (perhaps coincidentally) a second 'Harrier'?

This would also explain why the big black diamond shape seems odd misaligned relative to the one visible jet if they are supposed to be accompanying each other and flying on the same general path.
 
Nick Pope had apparently seen the original, and the colorized version is apparently what the photo looked like --according to him. It does make sense that it would be redacted; so many other UFO documents that have sections redacted, before becoming available. Then again there are a lot of UFO photos about, some real; perhaps they were gauging the reaction of folks in the MoD or something or it was a planted fake. The mond boggles at what might actually be out there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not only Nick Pope saw the original, though. Owen Hartop pinned it up in the office for every one to see. This picture wasn't considered top secret for several years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top