• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Latest Reports Of UFO Sightings

Just supposing that the Ukraine UFOs are real, just like the Foo Fighters of WW II, it wants to ask the question why are they above a battle field ?

And just supposing that the Ukraine UFOs are real, are the UFOs choosing a side to support. ?

Someone once asked did the German Nazi have UFO support for their jet engine program ?
 
charliebrown said:
Someone once asked did the German Nazi have UFO support for their jet engine program ?
Click to expand...
No, they didn't Remember that the British also developed the jet engine at the same time, using the same (human) pre-war research that the Nazi scientists were using; no need to involve aliens.
 
The jet-engined Italian Caproni Campini N.1 flew in 1940 but is usually overlooked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BS3
Supposedly Die Glocke or The Bell was alien inspired in Nazi Germany according to slave labor reports.
 
Sid said:
View attachment 74196
Click to expand...
Just heard this morning on the Radio news, that 'Tipsy' had apparently broke one of it's legs after having had a heavy landing caused be faulty data in height distance from Moons surface, which resulted in the landing being more of a crash landing, now they are planning to send another one up there A.S.A.P. as the critical problem is now known and corrected.
 
BS3 said:
It looks a bit like a boat. Could it be a boat?
Click to expand...

[Ukrainian troops film disc-shaped UFO hovering over warzone​


Troops in Ukraine have captured a UFO on camera, with footage apparently showing a large black disk hovering over the war-torn country.]
No, definitely not a boat ~ as it was reported as hovering over the war-torn country!
 
Sid said:

[Ukrainian troops film disc-shaped UFO hovering over warzone​


Troops in Ukraine have captured a UFO on camera, with footage apparently showing a large black disk hovering over the war-torn country.]
No, definitely not a boat ~ as it was reported as hovering over the war-torn country!
Click to expand...

Well, it does say "apparently" hovering so I'm not sure this has been definitively stated
 
BS3 said:
Well, it does say "apparently" hovering so I'm not sure this has been definitively stated
Click to expand...
Yes, it could either be a boat at sea, (or, a mirage of one appearing to be floating in the air) particularly if the drones view is looking slightly downwards.
Is it a boat/battle-ships outline though, as that would be a better factor.

1709203344793.png
 
Last edited:
eburacum said:
In a war zone where there are many different types of flying weapon, it seems more likely to be some sort of drone (or another military craft) than an alien.
Click to expand...
Don't think it could be a drone, as they stated it was around thirty miles away, at that sort of distance you'd be hard-pressed to see it?
 
Last edited:
This same article talks about an UFO this past April 2023 coming close to a St.Petersburg nuclear plant causing a special response.

Going back to the Ukraine UFO, being seen 30 miles away means a fairly large object.
 
Sid said:
Don't think it could be a drone, as they stated it was around thirty miles away, at that sort of distance you'd be hard-pressed to see it?
Click to expand...
That only works if their estimate of the distance is accurate. To confirm that we'd need more evidence.
 
Last edited:
One interesting aspect is that the UAP in Ukraine seems to have been below the horizon as seen from the drone, rather than above the horizon. So it is probably something on the ground rather than in the air.

charliebrown said:
The soldier claims his equipment was perfect and mirages don’t give off a heat signature
Click to expand...
This probably isn't a mirage as such, but it is not correct to say that mirages are not visible using infra-red. A mirage is caused by light bending when it passes through layers of air of different density, and this can happen to infra-red light in the same way it happens to visible light.
 
eburacum said:
One interesting aspect is that the UAP in Ukraine seems to have been below the horizon as seen from the drone, rather than above the horizon. So it is probably something on the ground rather than in the air.


This probably isn't a mirage as such, but it is not correct to say that mirages are not visible using infra-red. A mirage is caused by light bending when it passes through layers of air of different density, and this can happen to infra-red light in the same way it happens to visible light.
Click to expand...

Still think it might be a boat
 
The Ukrainian drone equipment, according to the report, showed a solid object 500 feet above sea level about the size of the Empire State Building.

I don’t think this was a boat.
 
For reasons that are probably obvious, we don't have a recording of the clip taken by the drone, but we do have a short clip taken on a smartphone which was filming the screen. This means we only have very little data about this UAP. There is no way to confirm the exact distance, tilt of the drone, or direction that the original movie was taken. So estimates of the height, size and distance are not necessarily reliable.

Mick West has pointed out that the readout that indicates the tilt of the camera swings almost at random from -2° to +5°, so we can't rely on the angle of the drone giving us any reliable clues as to distance.

I don't think we are going to get to the bottom of this without more information, which we probably won't get while the war is on-going.
 
Last edited:
I agree no more information coming.

I am surprised we got this much during a war.
 
eburacum said:
For reasons that are probably obvious, we don't have a recording of the clip taken by the drone, but we do have a short clip taken on a smartphone which was filming the screen. This means we only have very little data about this UAP. There is no way to confirm the exact distance, tilt of the drone, or direction that the original movie was taken. So estimates of the height, size and distance are not necessarily reliable.

Mick West has pointed out that the readout that indicates the tilt of the camera swings almost at random from -2° to +5°, so we can't rely on the angle of the drone giving us any reliable clues as to distance.

I don't think we are going to get to the bottom of this without more information, which we probably won't get while the war is on-going.
Click to expand...
This is what I believe I am seeing so far? Could this shape be that of the inverted 'V' shape of an ufo
just above the seas angled horizon?
*Tried to bring out slightly more definition by changing colour, and shadow levels.
**Notice that the left hand part of the object, as shown, definitely takes a dip slightly downwards. Would this be seen if it were a ship (at distance?) at sea, as it would appear level, even with a rolling sea swell.
1709721282310.png
 
Last edited:
Currently the thinking is that the horizon level is above the phenomenon, so it might be a building or other large feature projecting above the mist.
 
If this means anything to anyone, the drone at 300 feet detected an object 1,300 feet long at 500 feet that was 54 F or 12 C hotter than anything else in area which was silent, stationary and not affected by wind gusts.

The equipment was a commercial DJI Mavic 3 T used by a soldier who supposedly was an expert for many years.

So, the soldier’s equipment could be purchased by anyone.
 
Last edited:
Despite the fact that this happened in a war zone, full of people looking out for drone incursions and attacks, no reports from the ground have been made. The most likely explanation for this massive object is a large structure on the ground, a factory or greenhouse, which was visible above a layer of mist or fog.

Note that the temperature of this 'black-hot' object is still barely above freezing point.
 
eburacum said:
Despite the fact that this happened in a war zone, full of people looking out for drone incursions and attacks, no reports from the ground have been made. The most likely explanation for this massive object is a large structure on the ground, a factory or greenhouse, which was visible above a layer of mist or fog.

Note that the temperature of this 'black-hot' object is still barely above freezing point.
Click to expand...
Trouble with this report is that there was very little to work upon, other than a shot of an object that looks out-of-place, and not that clear either. Without further back-up details on what was seen, and experienced, it's anybody's guess as to what it really is/was, only guesses on what it possibly might be is still only a best guess!
 
The problem I have with this situation is that the soldiers have a commercial drone which when I checked on Amazon which sells a wide range of Mavic drones in all price ranges.

I would assume these soldiers would have military issued drones not commercial drones.

So, we don’t know if these soldiers are dress up fakes, and the whole thing is a fake sit up.

Then on the other hand that is what UFOs do which is “ lurk “.
 
This is probably the archive film they refer to, featuring two well-known figures in BUFORA.

https://www.macearchive.org/films/atv-today-27111969-ufo-sightings-stoke-trent

The incidents on September 2nd were part of a series of sightings at Bentilee over several days. Here's the one on August 31st (the same day as the Cussac case in France!) from NICAP's chronology for 1967:

Aug. 31, 1967; Bentilee, Stoke-On-Trent, Staffordshire, England
9:30 p.m. LT (5:30 p.m. EDT). Two young women reported watching a large, silvery-white object shaped like an inverted soup bowl (dome-shaped) that approached and hovered over a high school for about 5 minutes. The object had body lights of various colors and evenly-spaced circles of light like portholes around the lower part. A loud "whooshing" wind-like sound was heard. At each side and above the altitude of the object were shiny flat discs that appeared to be revolving. As the larger object moved away with a rocking motion, its body lights went off, leaving a bright orange and a fainter white light. Dull moonlight and rainy conditions.
Click to expand...

This was all a few weeks before the well-known "Flying Cross" flap, discussed elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top