• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Anomalous photography exercise

oldrover

Justified & Ancient
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
4,057
I went into the village of Mumbles this afternoon to do a bit of Christmas shopping as this may be one of the last chances I get this year. As I was pulling in I was lucky enough to be a witness to a bloody good UFO hoax.

I'm not going to bother describing what I saw flying and hovering over the village this afternoon, because while it was obviously something unusual, it was equally obviously someone playing a prank with a supped up quadcopter or similar.

What I did find particularly interesting from a Fortean perspective was what I then did might go someway to answering the often asked question, "why is it that today when everyone's got a camera phone can't anyone get a photo of..."

Well I saw something strange, I did decide to film it and I did have a camera phone. So I pulled over and had a go.

Firstly after safely pulling over it took me at least thirty seconds to find the phone's camera setting after having pretty much waded through the other hundred and one useless functions it's got to offer. And this isn't a flashy phone, it's an old Samsung Galaxy. When I did get to the camera, at which point it was hovering almost directly overhead, I pressed the wrong button and took a photo of the pavement. Only after the photo function reset or whatever it does, and a bit more fiddling did I get to the video facility. By this time of course the thing was flying away toward the sea.

Eventually though I did manage to start filming. I thought I got a few minutes but in fact it was only 40 seconds. In this footage you get plenty of close ups of my hand, a really nice shot of the pavement again and a glimpse of my right boot. I should point out that had I been excited or panicky thinking I was seeing something genuinely weird, it'd probably have taken longer again.

Of the actual time spent with the camera pointed directly at the object, I think only for a fleeting second do you get a tiny little flash of what might have been the object, and I'm not convinced of that. Apart fro this it's a chimney fest, as the phone wasn't able to pick anything else up at all.

To recap then, pulling in safely took a while, patting around your pockets to find the phone or camera takes time. Then getting the thing operational takes quite a long time, even when you're familiar with it. Then add in some fumble time, even if your perfectly calm. And finally allow for the very restrictive technical limitations of the equipment we've most often got to hand.

So as a sort of real life training exercise for gaining footage of something anomalous, I think that this shows unless you've got good quality equipment up and operational you've no bloody chance.

Consider this next time you wonder why someone with an SLR has only taken one photo, or why there aren't more pictures of the yeti*.

* Although not existing is probably a bigger barrier to a good photo.
 
"When I did get to the camera, at which point it was hovering almost directly overhead, I pressed the wrong button and took a photo of the pavement." :D

(I've taken pics of the pavement before, not even realising I'd pressed the shoot button! :oops: )

Perhaps would-be UFO-snappers should regularly practice taking pics of birds in flight. It's harder than it seems, and it might also show up the limitations of your camera.
 
I was about to say that some people walk around with their phone ready and in their hand... but then I figured they'd be too busy looking at the screen texting to notice what's flying over their head. :lol:
 
rynner2 said:
"When I did get to the camera, at which point it was hovering almost directly overhead, I pressed the wrong button and took a photo of the pavement." :D

(I've taken pics of the pavement before, not even realising I'd pressed the shoot button! :oops: )

Perhaps would-be UFO-snappers should regularly practice taking pics of birds in flight. It's harder than it seems, and it might also show up the limitations of your camera.

I actually did a similar exercise once just with normal propeller planes as I live near a local airport where Cessna type planes take off every two minutes or so. There are always plenty going around - but they are surprisingly hard to film or snap unless you happen to have the phone ready to snap. Usually after taking the phone out, unlocking it, switching to camera and getting it to focus you just end up with a blurry mess in the distance. Much like most UFO footage really.
 
Totally agree its so hard to get a pic of transient stuff. I had an issue with a series of dramatically low flying aircraft* all having to go WOT to miss my home by less than 30m. I had their register numbers by eye for complaint but NO chance by camera. If ET had flown past, slowly mooning me out of an airlock there would still be no good pics.

* these guys were all registered in the Low Countries and I suspect they just weren't anticipating the cliffs and hills. While some just throttled up others were clearly at max revs and being reckless, and yes I know the difference.
 
Nice! So where's the footage? :D
 
That is a really good point made by the OP.
While at a wedding next to the thames this year I noticed one of those micro drones with lights on flying overhead. I thought I'd catch a funny (if only to me) photo of the wedding party enjoying themselves oblivious to the 'UFO' hovering above - NO SUCH LUCK! Even with a DSLR camera it was impossible to shoot anything other than a blurry blob - and no I wasn't drunk!
 
Anyone who has tried to take a snap of a firework will know how hard it is to capture something moving quickly across the sky. As the OP said, add fear into the mix and you'd be hard pushed to take a picture of anything!
 
Here's the pavement photo;

http://s1170.photobucket.com/user/revot ... a.jpg.html

This will I'm sure be familiar to you rynner but at least you manage to capture your subjects for the 'Things that are not UFOs' thread.

As for how to post a video I've no idea, I'd like to because I think it'd be interesting to show what it actually looks like when you capture something on a camera phone. So if anyone's got any idea then I'll be happy to try.

Reading the replies I think most of us have had a go and found out how hard this sort of thing is.
 
oldrover said:
As for how to post a video I've no idea, I'd like to because I think it'd be interesting to show what it actually looks like when you capture something on a camera phone.

Put it on Youtube and post a link?
 
Is there another way, like photobucket but with videos, videobucket perhaps?
 
You may be able to put vids on Flickr.
 
I know it is stupid and unrelated to this (excellent!) thread but I was powerless to resist:

PW1Vtyl.jpg
 
A roflcatcopter is just what Amazon needs for distribution.
 
Thanks for posting that. I'm one of those old timers who have asked why there are no good UFO photos any more, what with everyone having a camera built into their phone. I think back to the Kodak camera I had as a youngster, it had a fixed lens (no fiddling with focus), no lens cap (quick wipe on my shirt), no adjustable shutter speed (again, no fiddling), just whip it up and click the shutter !!
I haven't seen a good "daylight disc" photo in ages.
Ah, the good old days …..
 
Friday evening I had the opportunity for another experiment - I was waiting for my train on Circular Quay Station and looking out at the Harbour Bridge when I noticed "something" flying around. It didn't look like a bird or a plane, and after some looking I could make out it was a remote control drone - probably practicing in preparation for the New Years Eve celebrations at the harbour.

So I took a vid with my phone - I had to put it on full zoom which explains the shakiness - I wasn't drinking, honest! :D

You can see it flying between the bridge and the sandstone building on the left (the Museum of Modern Art). It is hard to make out on the vid, even though I could clearly see with my (bad old) eyes that it was a four blade drone. Uploading to YouTube has further decreased the quality I noticed (file compression, I guess). Otherwise it is raw footage, unaltered in any shape or form. At the end, you can see it landing on the roof of "The Rocks" police station. Probably best viewed on full screen.

Oh by the way, my phone is a newish HTC Desire Android which has supposedly one of the better cameras going around. The result is - less than inspiring...

http://youtu.be/ymWLXIQmunA
 
If you hadn't said otherwise, I'd have put it down as a seagull! :D
 
Zilch you're a better camera man than me. I wish I could post mine up to show how marked this is.
 
Oh by the way, my phone is a newish HTC Desire Android which has supposedly one of the better cameras going around. The result is - less than inspiring...

I have quite a decent quality camera attached to my cycling helmet and have to say that while the picture quality is high, it doesn't hold up that well as soon as you try to enlarge any part of the image.

it doesn't hold up well at low light levels either, so if I film my commute home in the dark, a reasonably well lit street appears pitch black, aside from anything that actually is illuminated eg shop fronts, street and vehicle lights, any neon... gives the very strange impression that I'm passing little island of light in a sea of darkness.

I guess I'm also stuffed if a UFO flies over or something, although perhaps I'll try your experiment and see if I can capture a plane or the police helicopter or something, just to see what I get.
 
Back
Top