• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Astronomical News

Perhaps what we're seeing here is the inside of our own memory, the deep expression of a synapse.

I'm sorry. I can't stop thinking thoughts. That's what this kind of event should do, don't you think? Prompt the imagination towards the expression of material outfreakage?
 
pales in comparison
How can it?
It's the same thing as the bread crumbs on my breakfast plate. Same stuff. Different form.
91DFBE62-38B1-463D-BACA-2EE014A64833.jpeg
23_IMG002314.jpg764a2961c392766844d4fe7ccc72d5f9.jpgBudgerigar-5.jpg

 
For anyone else in the UK who, like me, has been excitedly waiting for the live press conference at 14:30 GMT, as it says on the JWST website, a reminder that we're currently in BST (GMT +1), and also a reminder that I'm an idiot, as though any were needed.
 
Last edited:
Well, that was certainly a shambles. But great images. I can't wait to see what else comes from the JWST.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sid
This page on NASA's Flickr account will help highlight some of the extraordinarily ancient galaxies in this image.

The oldest, most distant galaxies are receding much faster than light, so are extremely redshifted. They are also distorted by the gravity of foreground objects (and of the dark matter halos around those objects), and some galaxies are so distorted they appear in two different locations. The most distant galaxies appear magnified significantly by the expansion of the universe, so they look bigger than one might expect.

There are so many weird things going on in this image.
 
What will be exciting are the exoplanet images coming soon. It's possible it will be able to capture geological features and weather systems on the largest exoplanets(Jupiter like planets).
 
What will be exciting are the exoplanet images coming soon. It's possible it will be able to capture geological features and weather systems on the largest exoplanets(Jupiter like planets).
Mmm seems implausible, at least for a very long time. Maybe it could dwell at length on our own system's gas giants but not those of Betelgeuse, surely? Got any articles?
 
I like the bendy light.
There are different types seen in the image. All of them have fascinating reasons for appearing as they do.
Gravitational Lensing


Another thing that seems a bit off the mark is this online chorus of "This proves the Multiverse theory is true!".
Does it? How?
I'm guessing that's started by a poorly influencer who hadn't learned that there's more than one galaxy and it's set off the uncritical buffoon echo chamber.
 
Mmm seems implausible, at least for a very long time. Maybe it could dwell at length on our own system's gas giants but not those of Betelgeuse, surely? Got any articles?
The exposure time of the Deep Field photo was 12 hours. If you took a picture of an exoplanet with a 12 hour exposure it would come out as a blur. Many gas giants revolve in less than 12 hours. But it might be a blur which could yield some useful data.
 
Fascinating Horizon programme about the James Webb Space Telescope & the people, design & technology involved in accomplishing it.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episo...telescope-mission-to-the-edge-of-the-universe

The James Webb Telescope is an £8 billion gamble on the skills of its engineering team. It’s the first telescope designed to unfold in space – a complicated two-week operation in which 178 release devices must all work - 107 of them on the telescope's sun shield alone. If just one fails, the expensive telescope could become a giant piece of space junk.

From its conception in the late 1980s, the construction of Webb has posed a huge technical challenge. The team must build a mirror six times larger than Hubble’s and construct a vast sun shield the size of a tennis court, fold them up so they fit into an Ariane 5 rocket, then find a way to unfold them in space. This film tells the inside story of the James Webb Space Telescope in the words of the engineers who built it and the astronomers who will use it.
 
Ongoing data analysis indicated we needed to revise our last estimates of Betelgeuse's distance, size, and probable time left before it goes supernova. ...

Newly published research indicates Betelgeuse turned its current red color within historical times, and this helped in calculating new estimates for the star's age and the time left before it will probably go supernova ...
Red Supergiant Star Betelgeuse Was A Different Color Just 2,000 Years Ago

Today, it's on the brink of death: a huge, red ball of flame, glaring like a baleful, bloodshot eye before it winks out into a tiny pinprick of degenerate matter.

But red supergiant Betelgeuse was not always this way. Once upon a time, the star was a main-sequence monster – a blue-white O-type star, the most massive stellar weight class, fusing hydrogen like it was going out of style. As it reached the end of this live-fast-die-young lifestyle, it would have turned a more golden hue. And now astronomers have figured out how recently this was. ...

According to a review of observations of the star dating back to antiquity, it would have been yellow-orange in hue around 2,000 years ago. The transition to its current ruddy shade happened in the cosmic blink of an eye, even for a star with as short a lifespan as Betelgeuse. ...

But measuring the duration of this transition isn't just to satisfy idle curiosity. It has allowed an international team of scientists led by astronomer Ralph Neuhäuser of Friedrich Schiller University Jena in Germany to make a new estimate of the star's age – which, in turn, has given us a new timeline for its inevitable supernova. ...

Humans have been recording the sky for millennia… and those ancient texts, Neuhäuser and his colleagues surmised, could contain the answer.

They scoured historical records looking for references to the star. And they found them. Two millennia ago, ancient astronomers were referring to Betelgeuse as yellow.

In 100 BCE, in his Treatise on the celestial offices, Han Dynasty court astrologer Sima Qian described the star as being yellow in hue. Sirius, by contrast, was described as white, Bellatrix as blue, and red supergiant star Antares was described as… well, red.

If Betelgeuse was the same color, surely it would not be described as yellow. ...

Then, around 100 years later, along came Roman scholar Hyginius, author of a work titled De Astronomia. ...

"The Sun's star… body is large (i.e. bright), and color/coloration fiery/burning; similar to that star which is in the right shoulder of Orion (i.e. Betelgeuse)… Many have said that this star is (the star) of Saturn…"

This is an even more solid example – the color of Betelgeuse compared to the color of the Sun, and of Saturn, which appears more tawny than red. Other stars described by these observers are given accurate hues, the researchers say, paying special attention to descriptions of Antares, red giant Aldebaran, and red giant Arcturus, all described as red.

The changing color of Betelgeuse can be traced. By the 16th century, according to observations by Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe, Betelgeuse was redder than Aldebaran. Today, it is redder still, closer in hue to Antares ...

This transition, and the time it took, gave the researchers a parameter with which to estimate Betelgeuse's current age, and how long it has left before it goes kaboom. ...

"The very fact that it changed in color within two millennia from yellow-orange to red tells us, together with theoretical calculations, that it has 14 times the mass of our sun – and the mass is the main parameter defining the evolution of stars," Neuhäuser explains.

"Betelgeuse is now 14 million years old and in its late evolutionary phases. In about 1.5 million years, it will finally explode as a supernova." ...
FULL STORY: https://www.sciencealert.com/red-su...use-was-a-different-color-just-2000-years-ago
 
Here are the bibliographic details for the published research report. The full report is accessible at the link below.

R Neuhäuser, G Torres, M Mugrauer, D L Neuhäuser, J Chapman, D Luge, M Cosci
Colour evolution of Betelgeuse and Antares over two millennia, derived from historical records, as a new constraint on mass and age
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 516, Issue 1, October 2022, Pages 693–719.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1969

SOURCE / FULL REPORT: https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/516/1/693/6651563
 
The exposure time of the Deep Field photo was 12 hours. If you took a picture of an exoplanet with a 12 hour exposure it would come out as a blur. Many gas giants revolve in less than 12 hours. But it might be a blur which could yield some useful data.
Definitely worth doing. And I'll be around for the results and discussion.

Which reminds me, what is the consensus on the purpose of Artemis? Is it heavy lifting the Mars shot?
 

ABSTRACT​

After core hydrogen burning, massive stars evolve from blue-white dwarfs to red supergiants by expanding, brightening, and cooling within few millennia.

Did they mean to write A few millennia?
 
If you manage to see Jupiter in the night sky tonight, it just happens to be at opposition, so is closer and brighter than usual. I managed to see Ganymede and Callisto through my second-best binoculars this evening; you might have more luck and see Io and Europa too.
 
The Oort Cloud has long been presumed to be inhabited by icy objects, some of which enter the central solar system as long-period comets. Newly reported analysis of a 2021 Canadian fireball provides the first substantive evidence indicating the Oort Cloud also contains rocky objects. This has significant implications for theories and models of how the solar system formed.
Fireball from Solar System’s edge isn’t what astronomers expected

Rocky object suggests distant cloud of comets also contains asteroids

Just before dawn on 22 February 2021, a fireball lit up the skies across Canada’s Alberta province when a 2-kilogram space rock vaporized as it plunged through Earth’s atmosphere. Although the object hailed from the Oort Cloud—a conglomeration of comets at the edge of the Solar System—it wasn’t a comet, researchers now say. Data collected during its fall suggest the object was made of rock rather than ice and behaved more like an asteroid.

Independent observers of the new work say the find sheds light on the processes that formed our Solar System and challenges the conventional wisdom that the Oort Cloud only holds icy comets. “It’s telling us that there was scattering and depositing of material from all over the Solar System into the Oort Cloud,” says Karen Meech, a planetary scientist ...

The discovery could provide support for models that suggest objects from the asteroid belt were dispersed into the Oort Cloud soon after the Solar System’s birth 4.6 billion years ago ...

First proposed by Dutch astronomer Jan Oort in 1950, the Oort Cloud is a spherical halo of comets that stretches out halfway to Proxima Centauri, the Sun’s nearest neighbor, well beyond the view of even the largest telescopes. “Everything we know about it is indirect,” says Denis Vida, a meteor astronomer at Western University who led the new study. ...

Occasionally, a passing star will gravitationally nudge an Oort Cloud object and send it plummeting into the inner Solar System. These objects are known as long-period comets, defined by their eccentric paths that take hundreds or even thousands of years to orbit the Sun.

In 2016, Meech and colleagues reported the discovery of an unusual long-period comet that was dark and lacked a bright tail of vaporized ice. In fact, the object seemed much more like an asteroid—a clue that the Oort Cloud’s composition might not be so homogenous. Meech called it a Manx comet, after a breed of cat without a tail. Although astronomers have since detected dozens more of these comets, they have yet to definitively demonstrate that the objects are asteroids because they are so faint and fast-moving. ...

Now, with the Canadian fireball, researchers believe they have caught one of these rare objects crashing into Earth’s atmosphere. ...

Despite its provenance, the object was distinctly uncometlike. Most cometary fireballs are fragile; they fragment and burn up high in Earth’s atmosphere. But this object, plunging at 62 kilometers per second, penetrated much deeper, ... suggesting it was tough and rocky rather than icy. It also broke up in two phases at two discrete pressures–mirroring the breakup of a common kind of asteroid that drops meteorites to Earth.

Vida and colleagues turned to historical data to see whether other objects like this had been overlooked. They found that in 1979, a network of fireball cameras in Canada had tracked the demise of a 20-gram object that, like the Alberta object, was on a long-period orbit characteristic of an Oort Cloud object. It, too, fell through the atmosphere like rock, not ice. After comparing the 2021 and 1979 events with the total number of long-period comets caught by the two fireball networks, they calculated that between 1% and 20% of the Oort Cloud must be rocky. ...
FULL STORY: https://www.science.org/content/article/fireball-solar-system-s-edge-isn-t-what-astronomers-expected
 
Here are the bibliographic details and abstract from the research report, which is still in preprint stage (no peer review noted). The complete (PDF) preprint is accessible at the link below.


Vida, Denis & Brown, Peter & Devillepoix, Hadrien & Wiegert, Paul & Moser, Danielle & Matlovič, Pavol & Herd, Christopher & Hill, Patrick & Toth, Juraj & Cooke, William & Hladiuk, Donald. (2021).
First measurement of decimeter-sized rocky material in the Oort cloud.
10.21203/rs.3.rs-592064/v1.

Abstract
The Oort cloud is thought to be a reservoir of icy planetesimals and a source of long-period comets (LPCs) implanted from the outer Solar System during the time of giant planet formation. The presence of rocky ice-free bodies is much harder to explain. The rocky fraction in the Oort cloud is a key diagnostic of Solar System formation models as this ratio can distinguish between "massive" and "depleted" proto-asteroid belt scenarios and thus disentangle competing planet formation models. Objects of asteroidal appearance have been telescopically observed on LPC orbits, but from reflectance spectra alone it is uncertain whether they are asteroids or extinct comets. Here we report a first direct observation of a decimeter-sized rocky meteoroid on a retrograde LPC orbit (e ≈ 1.0, i = 121°). The ~2 kg object entered the atmosphere at 62 km/s. The associated fireball terminated at 46.5 km, 40 km deeper than cometary objects of similar mass and speed. During its flight, it experienced dynamic pressures of several MPa, comparable to meteorite-dropping fireballs. In contrast, cometary material measured by Rosetta have compressive strengths of ~1 kPa. The earliest fragmentation of this fireball occurred at >100 kPa, indicating it had a minimum global strength well in excess of cometary. A numerical ablation model produces bulk density and ablation properties consistent with asteroidal meteoroids. We estimate the flux of rocky objects impacting Earth from the Oort cloud to be ~0.7 × 10 ⁶ km ² per year to a mass limit of 10 g. This is ~6% of the total flux of fireballs on LPC-orbits to these masses. Our results suggests there is a high fraction of asteroidal material in the Oort cloud at small sizes and gives support to migration-based dynamical models of the formation of the Solar System which predict that significant rocky material is implanted in the Oort cloud, a result not explained by traditional Solar System formation models.

SOURCE: https://www.researchgate.net/public...imeter-sized_rocky_material_in_the_Oort_cloud
 
Back
Top