Emperor said:
I must admit I didn't really take the attribution of sex into account as it wasn't too clear
Emps
I agree, great jugs!
Seriously, though.
I said that the face "appeared to be a young male". Take a look at the face and maybe you can see why it could be percieved as a "young male" during the creation of the image in the mind of Alexius - it even has sideys! the link to the 'face' image is here:
http://www.angelfire.com/me/lucianarchy/psi_imageface.jpg
Don't get me wrong, I'm not disputing the scoring, it should, as they say, be 'self evident' to all concerned anyway.
Now for the nutty stuff - turn off here if you are easily cynicised. (that sounds painful. if it exists)
For future reference:
The crossroads thing. - My experience is that using this viualisation point enables the knowledge of all space/time to be accessible given the right conditions. The sender / carrier brings their image which can then be enhanced through global consciousness. I know it sounds woo-woo, but my experience is that this type of creative visualisation/scenario tends to get results which work for me.
This is why I'd like to see something about the background to the picture and the accompanying text. Even if Alexia had no knowledge of the background, it would still have its existence charged / invested with the collective meme of the shared consciousness associated with it.
The first thing I thought of when I saw it was "Ex-Peri!" / 'beyond magic!' - The image of the girl appears to be very similar to the nature of the 'Peri', a Persian nature 'spirit', certainly a faeri/innocent linked to the act of 'spititual intoxication'.
Is there even a title for the picture, can anyone read the text.?
I only want to know for my own muse, sure sometimes a dancing girl is just a dancing girl, but sometimes an experiment turns up something 'beyond magic'.
Finally, are we waiting for any other control feedback?