Lupinwick's a psi-hitter! I think most techs are (it would explain a lot). You know those random-number-generator tests that depend on radioactive decay, where they get people to focus on a particular result, and some people consistently score high and some people consistently score low? Engineers hate this result, but the implication is that we can mentally influence the world at a submicroscopic level - but some people get the opposite result from what they consciously want. Psi-missers in the tests are also people who don't like machines because they don't work well for them; psi-hitters are often techies! (I ought to source this - I think I may even own a book that describes the experiment - but I could spend all day looking for it and then it would turn out that I've only read it from the library, so screw it.) So these two telekinetic extremes are influencing the machines, but in such a subtle way - a single electronic impulse, the vibration of a single circuit, something like that - as to elude detection.
I do not pretend to be able to evaluate this or any other experiment involving submicroscopic particles and statistics, but this particular one stuck in my mind because it has such an elegant explanatory force for all those times the user follows all the proper procedures and can't get the machine to work, but the tech (electrical, computer, mechanical) comes along and it works right off. You start off psi-missing and creating minor glitches; then you get tense about it, especially when the psi-hitter comes in and sneers at you for thinking user error was a hardware problem; then your agitated psychic energy causes more and more glitches, until you're the office jinx.
Techies tend to assume that the users are stupid (and there's no denying, some of us are), which is why I now always wait until a malfunction happens consistently enough that I can let the tech go through the motions while I turn my back and describe what's happening. I cannot count the number of times I've had to describe a problem that the tech declared to be "impossible," yet it was very real, and they won't work on the problem until they see it for themselves. This procedure also reveals those occasions when I really am doing something wrong. I think it happened once, when I'd been given bad information or misunderstood an instruction. Every other time, I had the "impossible" malfunction as described and nobody ever apologized for being rude to me about it, either.
Yes, I am a psi-misser. I find the best thing to do is, when I've gotten worked up and frustrated, to walk away and do something else. Often the problem "fixes itself" while I'm gone. I've had problems of this sort every job I've ever been in, but I've had practically no computer problems since I quit the stupid day job. Coincidence? Who the heck knows?
Oh, and Rynner - I get the opposite problem with net access. I can go anywhere on the net, but I can't get my e-mail. Or sometimes a legitimate address suddenly gets rejected as non-existent if I send a message straight to it, but will be sent if I forward the message. I think that's a yahoo glitch, though. It never happens except with yahoo groups.