Anti-hijack technique - pass to all PILOTS and all LISTS you
How to resist a hijacker with a box-cutter?
TAKE A BLANKET, WAD IT UP, PUT IN ONE HAND, ENTANGLE
HIS BOX-CUTTER OR CERAMIC KNIFE AND SMASH HIM IN THE
FACE WITH YOUR OTHER FIST. OR USE PILLOW. Take the risk
of a cut or slash -- FIGHT BACK! Organize all able-bodied men and
tough women to do the same... call out to passengers to
resist! It is imperative you take action at the FIRST SIGN OF
A HIJACKER... DO NOT WAIT. Do not be a sheep. ALSO, USE
LAPTOP COMPUTER AS WEAPON. It is heavy -- smash hijackers
with it.
I already warned the USAF Academy list (many pilots) about
how pilots should ROLL THE AIRCRAFT to dump hijackers on their
heads. and LO! - two days later the US Airline Pilots Assn
announced they were telling their members to do this.
Sent to all for the benefit of all in this crisis.
Do not even __dream__ of calling it spam. It is meant to
save YOUR LIFE.
Put this INFO on ALL LISTS YOU ARE ON. This is international,
non-partisan, and straightforward. It is meant to SAVE LIVES.
Tell all pilots, and all authorities you can think of.
Also - some means must be found to scan for CERAMIC KNIVES
and pepper spray. Both were used in the hijackings.
PILOTS MUST BE ARMED. DOORS TO CABIN MUST BE LOCKED.
Follow the example of EL AL - Israeli airline.
New rubber or plastic bullets or high-shatter bullets must be
found to use in security guns - kill the hijacker but not
penetrate the aircraft wall.
BUILT-IN SLEEPING OR KNOCK OUT GAS must be in place,
for pilot to activate if need be, from nozzles in main cabins.
Jon-Erik Beckjord, consultant
45-540-9022
COPY AND PASS TO ALL LISTS.
dot23 said:
I don't know if this is the official 'WTC Disaster' thread, but I can't seem to find any more. Anyway, a few things that have interested me regarding this this weekend. First off I was listening to London Live (a radio chat show) and a muslim caller called the whole affair a conspiracy! He said that this was a perfect excuse for WWIII and that Bush and others had engineered the 'disaster' for this effect.
I want to bring something else up - the evidence. I've not had a chance to re-read the weeks papers, but I've subliminally picked up on quite a few things.
a) material left in car in Boston Airport, and 'eye-witness' who saw them arguing.
The impression one gets of the hijackers is of cold, calculating inhuman types. Yet they bicker in a car park. Also, they leave (believe this) a Qur'an, a flight training manual, and suicide notes in the car. Duh! Leaving evidence like this will be bound to implicate other member of other cells, and seems totally out of character. Why would you leave suicide notes when their friends and family lived in the middle east (in which case why not mail a note)? Why not leave a 'statement of intent' condemning the US etc? What if the car had been discovered before the attack on the WTC? It either speaks of extreme slopiness (which is not apparent in anything else they did) or the FBI involved in a stitch up (again!). Also, who was the eyewitness and why has s/he not been interviewed by the press, or a name released?
b) People in a Boston bar reported arab looking gentlemen saying 'wait until tomorrow,' threateningly after they got into an argument about US involvement in the middle-east (i think). Muslims (and especially those from shari'ah countries such as Saudi) DO NOT DRINK. Why would they be in a bar inciting people, when they were going to pull off the biggest terrorist event in history. Surely they would have been at home praying the night before?
c) the other missing planes. Where did they go, was anyone hurt, who was arrested - if anyone.
d) again, why did no one mention the origin of the hijackers when they called from their mobiles on board the fated planes? it would have taken one word in a recording to confirm our suspicions (Arab). Yet none appear.
e) Bush and co say they will show the 'evidence' to the world before they take any action. What evidence? That Bin Laden was interested in planes is like saying Branson's interested in Balloons! He's a multimillionare, why shouldn't he be interested in planes? One man on trial for the 1993 bombing of the WTC said that Bin Laden wanted the planes, and a few pilots, to ferry weapons from various places around Afghanistan and Pakistan. Case Closed?
Finally, f) The terrorists learned to fly in Florida, at flying schools with connections to Saudi Arabia. Suspicious, non?
to conclude: As always with the US, things are not neccessarily what they seem. None of the evidence exposed in the media seems to have anything to do with Saddam, Osama, or the Taleban. On these grounds, what basis does the US have to threaten Afghanistan and Iraq? Does the letting of innocent blood abroad appease the soul of the amrican nation? When both Iraq and Afghanistan are under UN sanctions, are in the middle of civil unrest and drought, is it morally right that their innocents must suffer like their counterparts in the US? What, if anything, is their left to bomb in these countries? After 20 years of fighting in these regions, is it not time that the civillians living there are given aid, the right to life, and self-rule, away from the fiddling fingers of the CIA?
Oh, a PS. If OBL is so evil, and the centre of a terrorist network, why doesn't the World Bank, or a similar body, put a holding order on any bank that traffics money for him and his organisation, and threaten countries that 'harbour' these banks with UN sanctions/trading embargos? It is well known he has assets in the region 0f 200 million dollars, so if that is known, surely where he keeps that money is also known. Money is the life blood of terrorism, and without it, it would shrivel and die.