• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

Personal Data On The Internet

Are you on Twitter or Facebook?

  • Yes, both

    Votes: 11 20.4%
  • Twitter only

    Votes: 6 11.1%
  • Facebook only

    Votes: 15 27.8%
  • Neither

    Votes: 20 37.0%
  • Neither, but some other 'social networking' site(s)

    Votes: 2 3.7%

  • Total voters
    54
Well it kind of taps into the Daily Fail 'Porn is bad and your children are looking at porn on the web right now!' meme that seems to paint the internet as a family friendly play park that must be protected from bad stuff, thus removing any requirement for parental responsibility.

The problem is that the "make the parents take responsibility" argument was a lot more credible ten years ago when the desktop could be placed in a family room and kids denied access to it when their parents weren't available to supervise. It's a lot harder to make that argument in a world of smartphones, tablets and free public wifi.

I'll admit to being torn on this. I'm instinctively against censorship but at the same time I think the pornification of our culture has had a deleterious and coarsening effect. Call me a prude, but I don't think it's good for kids to have easy access to hardcore material. In the past they may have snuck a peek at Playboy or whatever but now they can see material that would have been hard to find in specialist Soho shops at the click of a mouse.

Nor am I convinced that easy access to this stuff is particularly good for adults; there seems to be a lot more pressure on women to participate in stuff that they may be uncomfortable with and which their partner has clearly seen on the internet. On a very basic level it is clearly as a result of porn stauration that pubic hair on women is now seen as a complete no-no when it was seen, rightly, as pefectly normal as recently as the 90s.

The genie's out of the bottle so I'm not sure where this will end up but I don't think the industry's tactic of jamming fingers in ears while singling lalala I can't hear yoiu is going to wash for much longer.
 
Quake42 said:
The problem is that the "make the parents take responsibility" argument was a lot more credible ten years ago when the desktop could be placed in a family room and kids denied access to it when their parents weren't available to supervise. It's a lot harder to make that argument in a world of smartphones, tablets and free public wifi.

I'll admit to being torn on this. I'm instinctively against censorship but at the same time I think the pornification of our culture has had a deleterious and coarsening effect. Call me a prude, but I don't think it's good for kids to have easy access to hardcore material. In the past they may have snuck a peek at Playboy or whatever but now they can see material that would have been hard to find in specialist Soho shops at the click of a mouse.

Nor am I convinced that easy access to this stuff is particularly good for adults; there seems to be a lot more pressure on women to participate in stuff that they may be uncomfortable with and which their partner has clearly seen on the internet. On a very basic level it is clearly as a result of porn stauration that pubic hair on women is now seen as a complete no-no when it was seen, rightly, as pefectly normal as recently as the 90s.

The genie's out of the bottle so I'm not sure where this will end up but I don't think the industry's tactic of jamming fingers in ears while singling lalala I can't hear yoiu is going to wash for much longer.

There are technical solutions to the problem of parental responsibility that don't involve censorship at source, most routers these days have a parental filter and there is software available that is quite mature for web filtering. Perhaps a nice compromise would be the enabling of web filtering on all routers by default by ISPs unless explicitly turned off, so the decision is that of the individual parents to choose to exclude adult material or not. Ultimately this is something that is a parent's responsibility, just because they cannot see what the child is doing doesn't mitigate that.

Where I do agree however is on the pornification of culture. One wonders if future generations will die off because they assume that babies are made by performing the vinger stroke on your partner's face. The spontaneity of discovering that something is possible and enjoyable by exploration will disappear to be replaced by 'we've done this bit, now we need to move on to this bit' formula that seems to be a porn staple.

That said perhaps we underestimate people, if I based my outlook on the porn I'd seen as a teen I'd have believed that the sex act had to be performed between a man with a big moustache who spoke German and a woman with big hair whilst bad lift music played in the background. That said I still get worried when the guy turns up to fix my fridge if he has a big moustache in case some cheesy music cranks up. :shock:
 
The thing to remember about the Facebook stuff is that Facebook was/is doing crap like leaving on rape, beheading, etc. and removing tutorials on breast exams.

One may keep an orderly house without cramping free speech.
 
Heckler20 said:
That said perhaps we underestimate people, if I based my outlook on the porn I'd seen as a teen I'd have believed that the sex act had to be performed between a man with a big moustache who spoke German and a woman with big hair whilst bad lift music played in the background. That said I still get worried when the guy turns up to fix my fridge if he has a big moustache in case some cheesy music cranks up. :shock:

:lol:

Damn, I'm doing it wrong.
Note to self: must learn German and grow a fecking huge moustache.
 
And in the interim, do not under any circumstances call for a refrigerator repair man! :twisted:
 
On a serious note, I know quite a few women with kids who are pro-pron and have much bigger problems with stuff like dolls that look like anorexic prostitutes, music videos with 'accessory' girls in bra tops and everything to do with princesses out the wazoo.
 
I suppose it's better to be looking for porn and not be disappointed than not be looking for porn and being shocked when it appears, whether by an unfortunate search or more insidiously some pop culture pornalisation. The current number one single in the UK, for example, has a softcore version of its video for no good reason other than cynical publicity.
 
Heckler20 said:
.. if I based my outlook on the porn I'd seen as a teen I'd have believed that the sex act had to be performed between a man with a big moustache who spoke German and a woman with big hair whilst bad lift music played in the background...
Not only that, but once you got past 2nd base you'd suddenly find yourself walking down a 1970s street in a pair of flares. VHS porn, the lost world..
 
Full story:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22813893

Prime Minister David Cameron has been urged to launch an investigation into allegations that Britain's electronic listening post GCHQ has been gathering data through a secret US spy programme.

Labour's Keith Vaz said the claims were "chilling" and shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper demanded an inquiry.

According to The Guardian, GCHQ had access to data covertly gathered from leading internet firms in the US.


GCHQ said it operated within a "strict legal and policy framework".

The Guardian says it has obtained documents showing that the secret listening post had access to the Prism system, set up by America's National Security Agency (NSA), since at least June 2010.

'Astonished'

The documents were said to show that the British agency had generated 197 intelligence reports through the system in the 12 months to May 2012 - a 137% increase on the previous year.

The newspaper said that the Prism programme appeared to allow the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) to circumvent the formal legal process required to obtain personal material, such as emails, photographs and videos, from internet companies based outside the UK.

Mr Vaz, the chairman of the Commons Home Affairs Committee, said: "The most chilling aspect is that ordinary American citizens and potentially British citizens too were apparently unaware that their phone and online interactions could be watched.

"This seems to be the snooper's charter by the back door. I shall be writing to the home secretary asking for a full explanation..."

Wasn't sure where to put this story, so mods can move it as they see fit, but it seems anything you have on the internet is fair game for being snooped on now - by the professionals. It's a bit vague at the moment, but this might be the start of a scandal.
 
gncxx said:
...

Wasn't sure where to put this story, so mods can move it as they see fit, but it seems anything you have on the internet is fair game for being snooped on now - by the professionals. It's a bit vague at the moment, but this might be the start of a scandal.
I'm surprised that everybody's acting surprised.
 
I'm not surprised, but I agree it would be surprising that anyone would be surprised by this unsurprising revelation.
 
gncxx said:
Full story:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22813893

Prime Minister David Cameron has been urged to launch an investigation into allegations that Britain's electronic listening post GCHQ has been gathering data through a secret US spy programme.

Labour's Keith Vaz said the claims were "chilling" and shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper demanded an inquiry.

According to The Guardian, GCHQ had access to data covertly gathered from leading internet firms in the US.


GCHQ said it operated within a "strict legal and policy framework".

The Guardian says it has obtained documents showing that the secret listening post had access to the Prism system, set up by America's National Security Agency (NSA), since at least June 2010."
But now...

Is Edward Snowden's story unravelling? Why the Guardian's scoop is looking a bit dodgy
By Tim Stanley US politics Last updated: June 12th, 2013

Now that the dust has settled after the Edward Snowden affair, it’s time to ask some tough questions about The Guardian’s scoop of the week. Snowden’s story is that he dropped a $200,000 a year job and a (very attractive) girlfriend in Hawaii for a life in hiding in Hong Kong in order to expose the evils of the NSA's Prism programme. But bits of the story are now being questioned.

1. Why did he go to China? It was always an odd aspect of his plan that he should choose as his refuge from tyranny a totalitarian state that happily spies on its own people and imprisons dissenters. True, Hong Kong itself has a tradition of resistance to dictatorship, but it also has a treaty with the US that would make it relatively easy for America to extradite their guy back. Perhaps Snowden simply has the worst lawyers in history?

2. Snowden’s backstory is not entirely accurate. Booz Allen says that his salary was 40 per cent lower than thought and a real estate agent says that his house in Hawaii was empty for weeks before he vamoosed. Does the fact that he only worked for three months with Booz Allen and the NSA suggest he was planning a hit and run all along – that he took the job with the NSA with the intention of stealing the documents?

3. The administration is pushing back on the definition of what Prism actually is – that it’s not a snooping programme but a data management tool. The call logging accusations are pretty much beyond doubt (and reason enough to scream Big Brother) but the Prism angle is a little less clear. Extremetech points out that it is a programme that has hidden in public sight, that Prism is in fact, “the name of a web data management tool that is so boring that no one had ever bothered to report on its existence before now. It appears that the public Prism tool is simply a way to view and manage collected data, as well as correlate it with the source.” This is not to say that there isn’t a scandal to investigate here: “What is much more important is to pay attention to what data is being collected, and how.” But Prism might not be the smoking gun.

None of this debunks outright Snowden’s claims that the NSA is gathering data, that it has extraordinary power or that it has lied to Congress about it. But it does smack of a lack of fact checking on the part of The Guardian and it risks giving credibility to those who think this is a lot of fuss about nothing (and I'm not one of them). As Joshua Foust of Medium.com suggests, the problem probably rests with Snowden. He first approached the Washington Post via a freelancer and demanded that they publish everything without time for fact checking or government comment. The Post hesitated – so Snowden went to The Guardian instead. This forced the Post to speed up publication of its own story. Frost: “Both papers, in their rush, wound up printing misleading stories.” If so, they're in trouble.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timst ... bit-dodgy/

Dr Tim Stanley is a historian of the United States. His biography of Pat Buchanan is out now. His personal website is www.timothystanley.co.uk and you can follow him on Twitter @timothy_stanley.
 
Internet firms pressure US government to allow release of data request details
Internet companies are pressuring the US government to allow them to release more details about data requests from spy agencies in the wake of the National Security Agency (NSA)'s PRISM scandal.
By Jennifer O'Mahony, and agencies
1:57PM BST 12 Jun 2013

The heads of Facebook, Microsoft and Google are requesting permission from the Obama administration to disclose information about requests for users' data, seeking to reassure customers that the authorities cannot indiscriminately monitor their communications.

David Drummond, Google’s chief legal officer, sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Robert Mueller, according to a blog post yesterday. The letter asked for permission to report aggregate numbers of "national security requests".

Internet companies have maintained the government did not have direct access to their systems.
By asking to publish the number of security requests, Google is seeking to “show that our compliance with these requests falls far short of the claims being made,” Drummond wrote.
“Google has nothing to hide,” Drummond’s letter said. Transparency will “serve the public interest without harming national security,” he said.

The Obama administration confirmed the existence of classified programs to collect data on US residents’ telephone calls and foreign nationals’ Internet activity on June 6. Obama defended the practice, saying the government’s efforts are “modest encroachments” on privacy legally authorised by Congress and important to thwarting terrorist attacks.

The surveillance programme, code-named PRISM, allegedly allowed government spy agencies to look at the internet activities of foreign nationals suspected of being a threat to US national security.

The technology companies said they only hand over data to the government when required by law to do so. AOL and Apple released statements saying they had never heard of PRISM and don’t give the government direct access to servers without a court order.

Ted Ullyot, a lawyer for Facebook, wrote in an email: “We would welcome the opportunity to provide a transparency report that allows us to share with those who use Facebook around the world a complete picture of the government requests we receive, and how we respond".

Academics and web security specialists say there is a broad range of ways to harness the systems of the largest technology providers to monitor email, photos and video chats.

Search giant Google said it complies with valid legal requests and doesn’t give the US government unchecked access to users’ data, and said that by publishing data about the requests in its "Transparency Report," it would be able to prove to users that data is protected without harming national security.
The report tracks requests for user data from courts and governments worldwide.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/i ... tails.html
 
GCHQ taps fibre-optic cables for secret access to world's communications

Exclusive: British spy agency collects and stores vast quantities of global email messages, Facebook posts, internet histories and calls, and shares them with NSA, latest documents from Edward Snowden reveal

Britain's spy agency GCHQ has secretly gained access to the network of cables which carry the world's phone calls and internet traffic and has started to process vast streams of sensitive personal information which it is sharing with its American partner, the National Security Agency (NSA).

The sheer scale of the agency's ambition is reflected in the titles of its two principal components: Mastering the Internet and Global Telecoms Exploitation, aimed at scooping up as much online and telephone traffic as possible. This is all being carried out without any form of public acknowledgement or debate.

One key innovation has been GCHQ's ability to tap into and store huge volumes of data drawn from fibre-optic cables for up to 30 days so that it can be sifted and analysed. That operation, codenamed Tempora, has been running for some 18 months.

GCHQ and the NSA are consequently able to access and process vast quantities of communications between entirely innocent people, as well as targeted suspects.

This includes recordings of phone calls, the content of email messages, entries on Facebook and the history of any internet user's access to websites – all of which is deemed legal, even though the warrant system was supposed to limit interception to a specified range of targets.

The existence of the programme has been disclosed in documents shown to the Guardian by the NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden as part of his attempt to expose what he has called "the largest programme of suspicionless surveillance in human history".

"It's not just a US problem. The UK has a huge dog in this fight," Snowden told the Guardian. "They [GCHQ] are worse than the US."

However, on Friday a source with knowledge of intelligence argued that the data was collected legally under a system of safeguards, and had provided material that had led to significant breakthroughs in detecting and preventing serious crime.

The Guardian understands that a total of 850,000 NSA employees and US private contractors with top secret clearance had access to GCHQ databases.

The documents reveal that by last year GCHQ was handling 600m "telephone events" each day, had tapped more than 200 fibre-optic cables and was able to process data from at least 46 of them at a time.

Each of the cables carries data at a rate of 10 gigabits per second, so the tapped cables had the capacity, in theory, to deliver more than 21 petabytes a day – equivalent to sending all the information in all the books in the British Library 192 times every 24 hours.


And the scale of the programme is constantly increasing as more cables are tapped and GCHQ data storage facilities in the UK and abroad are expanded with the aim of processing terabits (thousands of gigabits) of data at a time.

For the 2 billion users of the world wide web, Tempora represents a window on to their everyday lives, sucking up every form of communication from the fibre-optic cables that ring the world.
Full story:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/2 ... ations-nsa

NSA leaks: US 'to charge Edward Snowden with spying'

US prosecutors have filed a sealed criminal complaint against a fugitive former intelligence analyst who leaked details of a secret internet surveillance operations, US media say.

The Washington Post says former National Security Agency (NSA) analyst Edward Snowden is being charged with espionage and theft.

It says the US has asked Hong Kong to detain Mr Snowden if he is still there.

The former NSA contractor fled to Hong Kong shortly before the scandal broke.

His leaks revealed that US agencies had systematically gathered vast amounts of phone and web data.

The Washington Post, citing US government officials, said that a sealed criminal complaint had been lodged with a federal court in an eastern district of Virginia and a provisional arrest warrant had been issued.

Mr Snowden, 30, was charged with espionage, theft and "conversion of government property", according to the report.

A US justice department official confirmed to the Associated Press news agency that a sealed criminal complaint had been filed against Mr Snowden but declined to specify the charges.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23012317
 
I've not only got my version of Firefox (Iceweasel), set for private browsing mode, so that it clears all my cookies at the end of every session, I've also added the 'Better Privacy' add-on. It should remove those sneaky flash cookies that some sites squirrel away instead of the more usual tracking cookies.
 
JamesWhitehead said:
Watching my browser load stories rather slowly from the Guardian this morning, I noticed there was a redirect to Outbrain, a "content recommendation service" which uses "behavioral targeting"

I had not noticed it before, perhaps because the stories normally load more quickly. I'm not exactly shocked or surprised but it does underline the way in which free web content turns the reader into the commodity. :?
True. I tend to avoid sites that load slowly. It's usually caused by loads of ads which I never read, however.
 
I'm surprised there don't seem to be any posts on Snowden's amusing "catch me if you can" jetsetting:

Edward Snowden leaves reporters chasing shadows around an airport

US whistleblower's rumoured arrival then non-departure from Russia leaves many in Moscow asking: was he ever even here?
Share

As the Aeroflot jet bound for Havana rolled away from the gate at Sheremetyevo airport, the question became: was he ever even really here?

For more than 24 hours the sprawling international airport on Moscow's northern outskirts was the site of an intricate game of cat-and-mouse. The target: Edward Snowden, sought by an enraged US, which has charged him with leaking classified documents on US surveillance programmes and warned countries suspected of abetting his escape.

The action culminated at 2pm on Monday afternoon outside gate 28, where Snowden was checked in for a flight to Havana, another stopover en route to Venezuela or Ecuador, where he had sought political asylum.

Dozens of journalists assembled at the window, hoping to spot the man who had eluded them for endless hours inside Sheremetyevo's winding halls. Hours later, they imagined, they would have Snowden cornered, ready to spill his innermost thoughts as the plane hurtled towards Havana for a full 12 hours.

The news zoomed through the hall – Russian news agencies reported that Snowden and his travelling companion, Sarah Harrison of WikiLeaks, had checked into seats 17A and 17C. Those seated nearby were giddy.

As the plane started to board, more than a dozen Aeroflot agents converged on the gate and ushered reporters away from the windows.

They threatened to confiscate cameras and telephones, and attempted to block the view. Some journalists said they were ready to hide their telephones in their pants. Anything for a snap of Snowden.

One by one, the journalists got on board – all the world's media, and Russia's too. The line dwindled to a crawl and the Aeroflot agents began to whisper: "He's not on board."

The gate closed. A detachable staircase pulled away from the aircraft. The Airbus began to roll backward. "He's not on board," said Nikolai Sokolov, an Aeroflot gate employee, his eyes wide. "I was waiting for him myself."

Around two dozen journalists settled in for the 12-hour journey to Havana – a flight on which no alcohol is served, much to the chagrin of the reporters, many of whom aren't used to going half a day without a stiff drink.

And, yet again, Snowden was nowhere to be found.

He was reportedly in Moscow for 21 hours but no photographs or video of him have emerged – no leaks from the Federal Security Service or police, who use the website Life News to broadcast the news they want the world to see.

Moscow has made its overtures to Snowden obvious, with Vladimir Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, repeatedly saying the Kremlin would consider an asylum request from the American, as it would from any other. But the events come amid the worst Russian-US relations since the end of the cold war, with the Kremlin once again making anti-Americanism a central governing pillar. The sight of a US whistleblower, hounded by his own government, being welcomed on Russian soil would be nothing short of a coup.

But was he ever here?

Continues at:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/ju ... ort-moscow

The Obama administration is doing itself no favours here - whatever the rights and wrongs of Snowden's actions it is looking like an incompetent bully.
 
Russia leads the way in the fight to protect national security....

Kremlin security agency to buy typewriters 'to avoid leaks'.

A 486,540-rouble (£9,860) order for electric typewriters has been placed by the FSO agency on the state procurement website.

The FSO has not commented on why it needs the old-fashioned devices.

But an agency source told Russia's Izvestiya newspaper the aim was to prevent leaks from computer hardware.

"After scandals with the distribution of secret documents by WikiLeaks, the exposes by Edward Snowden, reports about Dmitry Medvedev being bugged during his visit to the G20 London summit (in 2009), it has been decided to expand the practice of creating paper documents," the source said.

The source added that typewriters were already being used at Russia's defence and emergencies ministries for drafts and secret notes, and some reports had been prepared for President Vladimir Putin by typewriter.

Unlike printers, every typewriter had its own individual typing pattern which made it possible to link every document to a particular machine, Izvestiya said.

Mr Snowden, a former CIA contractor, has recently leaked thousands of classified US intelligence documents.

He is currently on the run from the US authorities, and is believed to be at Moscow's airport.

WikiLeaks grabbed world headlines in 2010 by releasing hundreds of thousands of US state department diplomatic cables, including secret files relating to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-23282308


Who would have thought it?
 
?‘Data brokers’ selling personal info of rape victims to marketers - report
Published time: December 19, 2013 23:12
http://rt.com/usa/brokers-marketing-health-data-523/

“Data brokers” track, categorize and sell personal health information for marketing use, a new US Senate report reveals. Data groupings include rape victims and HIV-positive individuals, those with depression and dementia, and womens’ gynecologist visits.

Hundreds of so-called “data brokers” in the US maintain databases made up of Americans’ sensitive health details. A report by the Senate Commerce Committee says the companies are legally allowed to withhold from individuals what data is collected, how one is categorized and who buys the information.

The report on the global multi-billion dollar industry was released Wednesday ahead of a committee hearing on such practices. Though the report does not detail wrongdoing, it does point out the reams of consumer data made available to marketers in the digital era. The information is used for targeted advertising across the web.

“Millions of consumers are now using computers, smart phones, and tablets to make purchases, plan trips, and research personal financial and health questions, among other activities,” the Senate report explains. “These digitally recorded decisions provide insights into the consumer’s habits, preferences, and financial and health status.”

During the Senate Commerce Committee hearing on Wednesday, privacy groups warned how far some companies have gone to amass and sell a person’s confidential information.

“There are consumer list brokers that sell lists of individually identifiable consumers grouped by characteristics. To our knowledge, it is not practically possible for an individual to find out if he or she is on these lists,” said Pam Dixon, executive director of the World Privacy Forum, in her testimony. “If a consumer learns that he or she is on a list, there is usually no way to get off the list.”

Dixon named one broker, MEDbase200, that has auctioned off lists of rape and domestic violence victims.

The committee found another, Epsilon, that offered at least one list of people who allegedly have medical conditions including anxiety, depression, diabetes, high blood pressure, insomnia, and osteoporosis.

An Epsilon spokesperson Diane Bruno told the Wall Street Journal many consumers report the information themselves on the company’s opinion-research website, and that Epsilon cooperated with the Senate committee. Yet she defended the shielding of lists from individuals.

“We also have to protect our business, and cannot release proprietary competitive information, or information that we’re prohibited from releasing based on contractual agreements with our clients.”

The report showed Equifax, one of the biggest consumer credit reporting agencies in the US, keeps a database that includes women’s visits to gynecologists within the last year.

The largest broker, Acxiom, allows consumers to view and amend the data gathered on them, yet the company does not allow anyone to see how information on them is being used.

The Senate report says the assembled information does not stop with personal health. People’s incomes, home loans and pets, for example, are used to put individuals into groups like “rural and barely making it” and “ethnic city strugglers.”

A great deal of the consumer data collected by the companies is inaccurate, according to reporting by the Wall Street Journal.

In some cases, compiled databases reveal contact information that is not allowed to be made public, the report found.
“This is where lawmakers can work to remove unsafe, unfair, and overall just deplorable lists from circulation,” Dixon said during the hearing. “There is no good policy reason why unsafe or unfair lists should exist.”

A recent study by the Government Accountability Office found that federal law does not protect consumers’ right to know what is being collected or how the data is used.

The Fair Credit Reporting Act allows for consumers to correct any credit information an agency may provide to landlords, employers, banks and others. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act bars health providers and insurance companies from offering patient information to outside entities. Yet that federal law does not cover data-mining brokers that sell health profiles. The Federal Trade Commission has called on brokers to be more transparent with the data.

“Current federal law does not fully address the use of new technologies, despite the fact that social media, web tracking, and mobile devices allow for faster, cheaper and more detailed data collection and sharing among resellers and private-sector entities,” the Senate report says, calling for more oversight of the industry.

The hearing’s revelations pertaining to MEDbase200, the company that collected information on victims of sexual assault and domestic violence, led to the company removing those lists from its website. A spokesperson for the company’s parent organization told the Wall Street Journal MEDbase200 did not intend to peddle any list entitled “rape sufferers” - which it was, at a price of $79 for 1,000 names - and that it was only a “hypothetical list of health conditions/ailments” created for internal use.

Upon questioning from the Wall Street Journal, MEDbase200 also nixed lists of HIV/AIDS patients and “peer pressure sufferers” that were for sale.
 
Cornish MP "sickened" to be linked to far-right group on Facebook.
By Plymouth Herald.
Sunday, December 29, 2013.

A CORNISH MP today said it was “sickening” to be linked to the far-right British National Party (BNP) on the social networking site Facebook.
Sheryll Murray, who represents South East Cornwall, said a stranger had signed her up to be a member of the splinter group the “Virtual BNP”.
The faction appeared on the “groups” section of Mrs Murray’s personal page – together with more than a dozen organisations she had not actively sanctioned.

Upon being contacted by The Herald, Mrs Murray immediately clicked away all the groups.

Plymouth Sutton MP Oliver Colvile was also surprised to hear he was apparently a member of more than 20 groups, including several promoting swing or gypsy music.

Conservative Mrs Murray called for Facebook to stop internet users from signing others up to groups without their knowledge.
She said: “I think it is absolutely appalling that people use MPs’ social media to do this. I had not signed up to any of the groups on the page.
“It is sickening to think someone would do this.”

Mrs Murray later posted on her Facebook site: “As I have been joined to groups by others, some of which I am against, I have taken the decision not to join any groups.
“I have currently removed myself from all groups, please do not be offended, and I will not be joining any new ones.”

The Virtual BNP claimed to have about 200 members, but most of the posts appeared to be from two people.
It opposes the leadership of party leader Nick Griffin, though posts show the members share his anti-immigration views.

Other groups to which Mrs Murray seemed to belong are more familiar, including community interests around her constituency.
But she said she had not signed up to any of them, even if she did support some of the causes.
Mrs Murray said: “One group is called ‘born and brought up in Liskeard’. Why would anyone sign me up for that? Anyone who knows me knows I was brought up in Millbrook.”
She said that any group which wanted her support should contact her directly.

Tory Mr Colvile said he would look at the 23 groups on his pages, including many he had never heard of.
They included the Biker Friendly La Bamba music bar and the Hot Club of Stonehouse, which promotes gypsy swing music, and Hamer and Isaacs Gypsy Swing Band.
He said: “I am certainly not a fan of gypsy or swing music.”

Plymouth Moor View Labour MP Alison Seabeck and Conservative MP for South West Devon Gary Streeter are not signed up for any groups on their Facebook pages.

Read more: http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Cornish ... z2oqZFE2OA
 
I wonder if any amount of security can stop an inside job from a high enough pay grade?

Barclays customer data 'stolen and sold', newspaper says

Investigations have been launched after a report that thousands of confidential files with Barclays Bank customers details had been stolen and sold.

The Mail on Sunday said an anonymous whistleblower had handed it a memory stick with the personal data of 2,000 Barclays customers, saying information on a further 25,000 was also available.


The files are said to hold passport and national insurance numbers, as well as money and health information.

Barclays said it was investigating.
Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote

This appears to be criminal action and we will co-operate with the authorities on pursuing the perpetrator”

Barclays spokesman

The report said the data, which also contained the individuals' attitude to risk, had been sold to "rogue City traders" and was "worth millions on the black market because it allowed unsuspecting individuals to be targeted in investment scams".
Bank 'grateful'

The files date from 2008. The customers in question had originally contacted the bank seeking financial advice from Barclays Financial Planning.

That division was shut down in 2011.

The Information Commissioner's Office said it would be working with the newspaper and police who were seeking more details.

The maximum fine for losing personal data is £500,000.

Financial commentator, David Buick, said the report was alarming: "It's the breach of trust... you as an individual actually knowing that your personal details about your life has been passed on to potentially an unscrupulous individual who will try and behave like a maverick and capitalise on your life.

"If this is proven it is absolutely disgraceful."

Barclays said it had contacted regulators as soon as it had been made aware, adding that it was grateful to the Mail on Sunday for bringing this to its attention.

''We will take all necessary steps to contact and advise those customers as soon as possible so that they can also ensure the safety of their personal data," a Barclays spokesman said.

He said protecting customers' data was a "top priority", adding: "This appears to be criminal action and we will co-operate with the authorities on pursuing the perpetrator."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26106138
 
Walsall mum stole identity to try to keep baby
By Michele Paduano, BBC Midlands health correspondent

A pregnant woman stole another woman's identity to try to stop her own baby from being removed from her care.
The woman, who has not been identified, pretended to be Kay Costin when she gave birth at Walsall Manor Hospital in August and was then able to leave with the child.

A leaked document from the hospital said the identity details were taken from a social-networking site.
But Mrs Costin has denied making her personal details publicly available.
Walsall Manor Hospital said such cases were "very rare".

Mrs Costin, who was also pregnant, had been booked in to give birth at Birmingham City Hospital.
The woman who stole her identity has since had her own baby taken away.
The incident only came to light when Mrs Costin attended a GP appointment while she was still pregnant.
However, her GP had notes to show she had given birth on 31 August. :shock:

Mrs Costin told the BBC the only information that she had made public on social media was her name.
"No address, no date of birth, no doctors, it's all private," she said.
"I think she knows me, I think it was someone I was friends with, but we haven't been told who it is," Mrs Costin said.

The document obtained by the BBC shows the woman who stole the identity referred herself to Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust while in labour.
Police said a 24-year-old woman had been questioned in September, but no charges were pursued.
The woman had previously had three children removed from her, all of whom were placed in the care of the local authority.

The health trust said the woman had provided details of her assumed identity but did not have her pregnancy records with her.
Instead, she said the notes were with the community midwife.
The hospital midwife in Walsall called the neighbouring hospital to confirm the pregnancy details of Mrs Costin, who the woman in labour claimed she was.

Mrs Costin said she would like an apology from the hospital for the "distress" she went through, which she believes caused her to need an emergency caesarean.

------------------------------------------
Too much information?

According to a 2012 survey by the Department of Health, increasing numbers of mothers-to-be are sharing details online:
The survey said nearly 90% of mothers had seen an image from a friend's scan, while 22% had seen a photo of a positive pregnancy test
Almost half - 44% - of the women surveyed saw Facebook as a place to share advice and seek help, while 77% were keen to be of help to other mums
While 44% of those surveyed thought people were beginning to "overshare" about their pregnancies on social media, 81% wanted other mums to talk more about their health online
---------------------------------------

The Walsall Healthcare Trust said it had carried out an investigation into what happened.
It said it had now strengthened its procedures for admitting women in labour and had reassessed how it then discharged them and their babies.
The trust said anyone turning up without their notes would need to have their identification formally confirmed by the hospital, social services and the police.
Anyone who cannot get their identity confirmed may be prevented from being discharged from the hospital.

Richard Kirby, the trust's chief executive, said: "The incident related to an identity theft by an individual using our maternity service. Although this is a very rare occurrence, the learning from this incident has been of value across the organisation."

Kat Tremlett from the UK Safer Internet Centre, said: "Pregnant women and new mums often use online forums to share experiences.
"You are talking to people you believe are going through the same experiences and perhaps you let down your guard a little.
"We would urge women to take the same precautions they would use on any other internet site."

Jo Walker, from the Suzy Lamplugh Trust, which campaigns on the subject of personal safety, said: "It's easy to think you know people you have met online and that they are your friends and and you can end up sharing a lot of information with them.
"But you have no idea if what they are saying is true and how they are going to use that information."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bi ... m-26519216
 
Facebook status used to catch Exeter benefits cheat

A married benefits cheat who swindled £65,000 by claiming she was a single mother was caught after investigators checked her Facebook status, Exeter Crown Court has heard.

Samantha Close, 27, of Wykes Road, Exeter, admitted five counts of benefit fraud.
She had claimed she was struggling alone with two children but her Facebook page showed she was married.
Close was jailed for 26 weeks, suspended for 18 months.

The court heard she claimed the money in income support, working tax benefits and housing benefits.
Prosecutor Jonathan Barnes, said Close started claiming legitimate claims in 2006 when she was unmarried.
However, the problems began in 2008 when she failed to inform the benefits agency that future husband Daniel Close moved in with her.

The couple then married in September 2012, which again did not put her off making the claims, for which she lied in phone calls and on housing benefit forms.
Mr Barnes said: "When she was interviewed, the officer confronted her with evidence which the department obtained from Facebook which showed she and Mr Close as a united couple from 2009."

Emily Pitts, defending, said Close devoted her life to looking after her sick mother in Cullompton, working at a call centre to keep her children, and paying for some of the child care for her daughter aged seven and son aged three.
Miss Pitts added: "The remorse she demonstrates is truly genuine."

Judge Jeremy Griggs said: "You are responsible for two young children and without getting a lot of support and clearly have considerable difficulties, but, on the other hand, this was criminal activity.
"It was a legitimate claim at first but in the situation you found yourself you did not feel able to tell the authorities what the position was."

The overpayments are being recouped from the benefits she is still receiving.

The court heard Close's husband had since left her. :roll:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-26583548
 
This story dates from March, but it doesn't seem to have been posted here before:

Teen's Facebook brag costs dad $80,000 lawsuit settlement
By Anthony Zurcher, Editor, Echo Chambers

Some things are better left unposted
When Dana Snay learned her father had been awarded a cash settlement in an age-discrimination lawsuit against his former employer, the Miami-based Gulliver Preparatory School, she couldn't resist bragging about it.
"Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver," the teen posted to her 1,200 Facebook friends. "Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT."

It was a bit of boasting that could end up costing the Snays the entire $80,000 (£47,750) settlement, reports the Miami Herald.
When Gulliver got wind of post, which didn't take long, as Dana was a former student, the school refused to pay a dime because the father had signed a confidentiality agreement - and on Wednesday a Florida appeals court found in its favour. :shock:

The story has writers drawing conclusions about the foolishness of today's youth and the perils of social media.
Elie Mystal on the blog Above the Law calls it "a new low for the Millennial generation".
"Remember when all you had to worry about was your daughter posting naked selfies of herself on Facebook?" he writes. "Now, things are worse."

Slate's Katy Waldman has a message for her contemporaries:
What can we learn from their misfortune, fellow millennials? Do not boast. Do not mess with attorneys. Do not over-share on social media, especially when you're not even going on a European vacation. (Snay was joking.)

The story isn't necessarily over, however.
The father can appeal the ruling to the Florida Supreme Court. Of course, the longer this drags on, the more of that settlement money will likely be eaten up by lawyers.

The hypothetical European vacation may end up becoming a long weekend in Key West - assuming the daughter isn't grounded for life. :twisted:

Eric B Meyer of the Employer Handbook blog takes a closer look at the applicable law.
"Honestly, I'm surprised that the court enforced such a large penalty provision in the settlement agreement," he writes. "But, then again, the violation - broadcasting the existence of the agreement to 1200 people - is fairly egregious."
He concludes: "That's why, when I draft a settlement agreement, I often include confidentiality language warning that keeping quiet about the agreement means shutting your yap and your social media fingers."

So "confidentiality" means not telling anyone, including your friend, Mr Facebook. Good tip. 8)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-echochambers-26393546
 
A shocker here:

'Horrifying lapse' at Penryn College as personal pupil details sent to every student: FULL STORY
6:00am Wednesday 23rd April 2014

A “horrifying” lapse at Penryn College saw personal pupil details sent to every student in the school.
In what has been described by one parent as a “clear breach” of confidentiality, a document that included data about children's special educational needs and their families' financial status was emailed to more than 1,000 students due to “human error” on the part of a school administrator. :shock:

The behaviour and achievement report records over 300 behavioural incidents which took place at the college between March 24 and 28, ranging in severity from forgotten homework or school equipment to an incident where one child kicked another in the head.

It also contains columns with information about children's special educational needs, together with details of whether they are eligible for free school meals and for the pupil premium (additional funding to raise the attainment of disadvantaged pupils) - two things that can both be considered as indicative of the economic status of a pupil and their family.

Headteacher Marie Hunter said the school apologised “unreservedly” for the error.
She told the Packet: “The college has written apologising to all parents and students informing them that information will not be circulated in this way again at the college.
“The college takes its responsibilities for protection of data extremely seriously and apologises unreservedly for this error. It asks that if you have received a copy of this information, please delete it immediately as you will be in breach of data protection if you knowingly share it with another person.”

She added that the incident had been reported to the Data Protection Agency and said: “It was a human error and the person concerned is understandably very upset about it.”

However, the parent of one pupil named on the list said: “I am dismayed and horrified that this should have happened.
“It is a clear breach of everything that one would expect from a school in relation to confidentiality.”
She added that she hoped the authorities would take a “very serious view” of the issue.

Another parent, who saw the email after it was sent to his daughter, said: “My daughter received this by mistake in her college email account, and also found out all her friends had the same email.”

Mrs Hunter said all students were asked to delete the email without opening it.
“We now know a student subsequently forwarded the email from her school account. We are investigating how this could have happened. A parent informed the college that he had seen the email during the Easter break.

“Unfortunately, students' eligibility for pupil premium and free school meals or [those who] have special education needs was also identified on the email by a letter of the alphabet.
“This is because the Department for Education asks all schools to track the achievement and progress of these groups of students.”

One email was sent by the administrator to all staff on April 2, two days before the end of term, just before 11.30am. Four minutes later another was sent, with the report attached and the message “sorry forgot to add them - they are now enclosed”, but to all students.

The school said that although the email was immediately recalled, the technical process takes 30 minutes, and during this time a small number of students using computers would have been able to open the email and forward it, which meant that these copies could still have been in circulation.
They also sent an email to tutors explaining the mistake, and they in turn spoke to the children about the confidential nature of the message, and asked them to delete it from their inbox.

Cornwall Councillor Andrew Wallis, the cabinet member for children, schools and families, said: “It's very disappointing that this email was sent with potentially sensitive information.
“The school is an academy, so responsible for its own data management, but hopefully they will learn from this and put more robust steps in place to make sure this doesn't happen again.”

When asked whether sharing such information among staff members was common practice, Mrs Hunter said that she could not comment on other schools, but that “tracking behaviour and achievement is part and parcel of school life.”
She added that behaviour at the school, recently commended by the Minister of State for Schools as one of the 100 most improved for GCSE results, was “great with the majority of kids.”

http://www.falmouthpacket.co.uk/news/11 ... ?ref=var_0

That genie is out of the bottle now - I bet it won't be the last.
 
This could be in Dumbest Criminals too:

Facebook pictures catch out thieving nanny
Becki and Bradley Cannings set up secret cameras when police told them photographs of their nanny in stolen clothes was not enough evidence
By Hayley Dixon
11:59AM BST 24 Apr 2014

A couple who noticed clothes and jewellery going missing discovered the culprit was their nanny after they spotted her wearing them on Facebook, a court heard.
Becki and Bradley Cannings noticed that expensive items were disappearing from their home and made the connection after their mother spotted the photos, some of which Mrs Cannings was tagged in, on social media.

Before then Mrs Cannings, 29, had not suspected nanny Pascale Sherwin, 23, as she was “one of the family”.
After taking the photographs to the police and being told more evidence was needed they set up five secret cameras in their home to catch Sherwin in the act.
The couple had been employing the nanny - known as Sasha - to look after their two-year-old daughter Olivia.
Sherwin, of Honiton, Devon, admitted theft from employers at Exeter Crown Court and was ordered to do 200 hours unpaid community work.

Speaking after the hearing, Becki said: "Every week random things were going missing. It really started getting to me and I thought I was going mad.
"It did not add up. I started to make a list and realised just how much was going missing.
"I hate myself for it now but I started thinking if anyone I knew would do this. I feel stupid but I never once considered it would be her. She had become part of the family.

"Mum then looked on Sasha's Facebook account and I felt physically sick. In her profile picture she was wearing all of my clothes and was doing so in several others.
"I was even tagged in them. I don't know if she was just stupid or rubbing my nose in it. I have never felt so violated and my whole world came tumbling down."

Mrs Cannings said despite the Facebook evidence, she still hoped Sherwin wasn't the one stealing the belongings.
She said: "I was still hoping it had been a big misunderstanding. I didn't want to do any of it, but it was the only way we could prove anything.
"But viewing the footage was like sitting down to watch a horror movie.
"We thought we would be fast-forwarding a lot but within five minutes we caught her stealing a cardigan and putting it in her bag.
"On each of the three days she stole from us. We allowed her to build a relationship with our daughter and be part of her everyday life. This was the ultimate betrayal."

The Cannings first met the qualified nanny when she was working at a creche in November 2011.
She took a shine to Olivia and offered to do babysitting and after a few casual shifts and started looking after Olivia a couple of times a week in January 2012.

Mrs Cannings said: "We had her checked and she was highly regarded and professionally trained as a nanny.
"She just seemed like a lovely girl and would update us hourly by texting photos of her with Olivia.
"She helped me get ready on the morning of my wedding and was at my daughter's naming ceremony.
"She became part of the family and it seemed the ideal arrangement. By summer she was working longer, we had upped her pay and she had all the freedom in the world."

In March 2012, belongings started to go missing around the house, but it was after the couple's wedding day when jewellery given to Mrs Cannings disappeared she started to panic.

Judge Erik Salomonsen said it was a serious offence because it involved a breach of the trust which the couple had vested in her.

Mr Cannings, 40, who owns an electrical engineering firm, said Sherwin has shown no remorse or said sorry for her actions.
He said: "It makes my blood boil that she has not even apologised and has been laughing in our face. But she will have to live with a criminal record."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... othes.html
 
Sad to hear that PleaseRobMe.com has shut down, more of the story on the link below:

Foursquare's Stalker Problem
Social networks that broadcast your exact location make it easy for strangers to watch your every move—and become part of your life without you even knowing it.

Social networks that broadcast your exact location make it easy for strangers to watch your every move—and become part of your life without you even knowing it. The Crime Report's Lisa Riordan Seville on geotagging and stalking.

In the world of social networking, Carri Bugbee is hardly a novice. The social-media marketing strategist from Portland, Oregon, has 7,164 followers on Twitter, 1,197 friends on Facebook, and more than 500 connections on LinkedIn. But when she ventured into the world of geotagging—the technology behind many of the social networks that broadcast your location to the Internet—she received an unsettling wake-up call.

One evening last February, she picked up her phone and "checked-in" to a local restaurant on foursquare, the popular location-based social network that lets others know where you are in real-time. Foursquare posted her location to her feed and Bugbee went back to chatting with her friends over the menu. That's when the hostess came over to the table and told her she had a call on the restaurant telephone.

Bugbee didn't recognize the male voice on the other end of the line, and the voice didn't offer to introduce itself. It told her she shouldn't use foursquare because if she did, certain people might find out where she lived. She nervously laughed off the creepy comment, telling the caller it was pretty hard to find her house. That set him off. "You stupid bitch," he said, an opening to a string of insults. She quickly hung up, rattled.

The caller had tracked down Bugbee through PleaseRobMe.com, a website designed to warn people about the risks of geotagging by aggregating and publicizing updates from foursquare. In Bugbee's case, the warning was effective.

"I was totally creeped out," she recalls. "I just didn't ever think it would happen to me ... I slept with all the lights on that night." She also immediately quit foursquare and hired a house sitter. She says she felt that someone "basically stalked me," and she's become, as she put it, a "geotagging curmudgeon."

"I think that a lot of people have drunk the Kool-Aid without actually thinking that hard about" location-based technologies, says Bugbee. "At some point, some tragedy will occur."

PleaseRobMe shut down last spring after a string of incidents like Bugbee's suggested it might be a little too helpful to would-be criminals. Nevertheless, its founders said they had accomplished their goal of educating users about the risks of broadcasting their location to the world. And even without PleaseRobMe, it's often easy enough to find someone's location on foursquare itself, especially since many people cross-post their check-ins on Twitter and other websites.

The Daily Beast
 
Hold on, people advertise their precise real-time location to a potential pool of millions of unknown quantities and are then surprised when stuff gets a bit moody?

For some reason I have an irresistible urge to use the phrase, 'no shit'.
 
Exactly.

I can understand 'checking-in' on Facebook, if you have your privacy settings correct then only your friends will see it, and it can be useful if you're meeting people. If your friends are planning on robbing your house then maybe you need to get new friends!

Foursquare is less controllable from what I remember.
 
Back
Top