- Joined
- Mar 9, 2002
- Messages
- 13,692
LOL !
Mana said:I guess the points that Adam Rang and Nwoisevil are trying to make are that though David Icke may be a raving lunatic, he is also capable of sober lucidity. Don't let the crazy ravings cloud his true message.
Permission to flame if I'm barking up the wrong tree - Adam Rang and Nwoisevil only.
Adam Rang said:In my opinion anyone who dis-misses Icke is an idiot.
Adam Rang said:Worse that that... there sheep.
Adam Rang said:Why? Becuase Ironically they have done the exact thing that Icke has told them to do. Icke tells us...
1. You can either read my books and find out the truth...blah blah blah.
or...
2. You can close the book and return to your present belief systmen.
....and remarkedbly poeple actually follow Ickes command to the letter.
Adam Rang said:There is a third option however that Icke doesnt mention....
3. You can use your own mind.
Adam Rang said:Icke says that all his work is to viewed as one to understand how the global agenda fits together....
Adam Rang said:what Icke has really done is assemble work from all the major conspiracyt theorists and lump it all together with his own little theory of the lizards. If your clever you will look at Ickes work however and sort the info from the rubbish and perhaps come away a little more enlightened.....
harlequin said:Let him who is without typographic or grammatical error cast the first stone...
8¬)
DerekH said:Ah, right, given a choice between 'read the book' and 'don't read the book' - both 'Ickes command' (sic) - it is somehow remarkable that people do one or the other.
Enlightened? Yes - don't shell out good cash on books written by the one-time self-proclaimed reincarnation of the Son of God....
Mr. Icke has assembled work from all the major conspiracy theorists - so why not read it at source, instead of wading through lots of extraneous material to find the occasional nugget of information?
Conspiracy theories seem, to me, to tend to be somewhat extreme and paranoid, as well as requiring the complicity of far too many people. I am, however, willing to believe that there may be something behind them.
Glensheen'sGirl said:People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones?
Adam Rang said:The choice is to believe what he says without question or ignor everything he says. Which one are you Derek?
Adam Rang said:Icke said that we were all the sons and duaghters of god becuase we were created by him. This is a belief held by, I think, around 4 Billion poeple on this planet.
Adam Rang said:Then do exactly that. Icke lists all his scources for you.
Adam Rang said:Good for you. But how about looking at them case by case like any normal person?
Adam Rang said:Can you provide a scource for that?
Adam Rang said:I'm not sure about that, poeple make a living off taking Ickes comments out of contect, especially his son of god ones.
Adam Rang said:The scource was bullshit thats why :blah:
Adam Rang said:I dont have time to look for something that doesnt exist.
The choice is to believe what he says without question or ignor everything he says. Which one are you Derek?
Adam Rang said:Stu, you've taken that out of context. Read the rest of the thread.
simonsmith said:He's 15 years old!
Stu Neville said:It still doesn't explain why you can't just agree with some of Icke's propositions and not others: the all or nothing doctrine smacks (to me) of fundie type zeal.
Adam Rang said:You can do that. Its what I did. Its what I want poeple to do. The all or nothing doctrine was Ickes, not mine.
Yup. Adam R is right. I'm no fan of Icke, but he has always been careful to explain that he is not the reincarnation of JC, just part of the same soul-group. That sounds like nit-picking - and it is to somebody who doesn't share his New Age mind-set - but to him it is a major difference. If he actually did believe he was JC, he'd have come right out and said so, very clearly.Adam Rang said:I'm not sure about that, poeple make a living off taking Ickes comments out of contect, especially his son of god ones.
[EDIT]
David Icke never said he was the incarnation of Jesus Christ. Annisdoti (?) was an Icke-watcher, she'll (i hope) confirm this. What he actually said was that he was the son of the 'godhead' and went on to ellaborate by saying that we were all the sons and daughters of God. I'm not to sure who would want to go out of their way to change Icke's words like that in order to make him look stupid. hmm.. i wonder.