• We have updated the guidelines regarding posting political content: please see the stickied thread on Website Issues.

The Bawdy Of Christ

Mighty_Emperor

Gone But Not Forgotten
(ACCOUNT RETIRED)
Joined
Aug 18, 2002
Messages
19,407
The Bawdy of Christ

Is St. Joseph’s Christ mural symbolic of Diocesan pedophilia problems?


by Gustavo Arellano

On the majestic stone wall outside Saint Joseph’s Church in Santa Ana, a two-story mural of Jesus greets commuters speeding west on Civic Center Drive. Painted during the mid-1980s, the mural depicts Jesus standing on a mount as rays of light lift Him toward heaven. A halo swirls around His head. His wounds are fresh and jagged; His right arm is held high in benediction.

Jesus blesses the world. Nothing strange about that. But centuries of artistic tradition soon give way to tawdry modernistic expression. Instead of shoulder-length locks, this Jesus sports bobbed hair like a Sylvia Plath heroine. His pasty, beardless face resembles a youthful Medici maiden; even judged against your average Eurocentric depiction of the 33-year-old martyred Nazarene, this one’s weirdly northern.

But that’s not what’s weirdest. More interestingly, Jesus is completely nude. Nowhere is the tattered cloth that two millennia of Christian art universally placed across His crotch. Instead, a red bulge suggests the Savior’s scrotum, while a swath of pink appears to indicate the Holy Johnson.

Hello!

Now, perhaps it is only coincidence that, until this summer, this same church was presided over by Father César Salazar, who is awaiting results of a federal investigation into charges he downloaded child pornography. But long before Salazar was swept into the church’s broadening sex scandal, the St. Joseph mural was an object of scorn among sex-abuse victims who see the piece as symbolic of the Diocese of Orange’s lax attitude toward deviant priests.

At a recent gathering of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) outside Our Lady of Guadalupe Church in Santa Ana’s rough Delhi barrio, two abuse victims recalled the mural’s debut.

"You mean the boner Jesus?" said Joelle Casteix with a laugh. "I remember that—my family left St. Joseph’s soon after because of the scandal surrounding it." Many families went along with hers to Holy Family Cathedral in Orange because of the mural, she claimed.

Given that the artwork still, uh, hangs, Casteix finds it appropriate that the latest church scandal involves a St. Joseph’s clergyman. Salazar, 37, an Orange County-raised priest, had his laptop seized by Santa Ana police in 2001 after church officials allegedly discovered hundreds of pornographic images of children on the computer. Police detectives turned his case over to the district attorney for prosecution, but Salazar continued preaching at St. Joseph’s until July of this year. That’s when the diocese placed him on inactive leave after former diocesan lay worker Fernando Guido—disgusted with official inaction—asked the FBI to investigate.

It’s easy to dismiss complaints against St. Joseph’s mural as originating from a prudish American Catholic sensibility influenced by the image of Warner Sallman’s 1941 painting Head of Christ—the ubiquitous portrait featuring a bearded, pensive Euro Jesus—or as another tactic by sex-abuse activists to further demonize church officials as perverts.

St. Joseph’s officials did not return a call for comment on this story.

But the most prominent critic of the church’s mural is none other than Norman McFarland. Orange County’s bishop until 1998, McFarland was deposed on June 19, 2001, for DiMaria vs. Harris, the landmark case that forced the Diocese of Orange to pay .2 million to a student sexually molested by former Mater Dei and Santa Margarita High School principal Michael Harris.

McFarland lambasted the St. Joseph’s mural without prompting.

"Quite a bizarre painting," he called it. "It wasn’t something that I thought was anywhere [near] good art."

McFarland mentioned that homeowners living around St. Joseph’s complained that a parish priest had "painted a naked man up there," graphically displaying Him "in the state of erection."

Things got so bad, according to McFarland’s testimony, that the diocese received a call from the apostolic delegate, the papal representative to the United States, because so many people had written to the pope complaining about the mural.

Salazar hasn’t preached since July. His backers rallied inside St. Joseph’s gym soon after, accusing diocesan officials of deserting Salazar. The mural of Naked Jesus seemed to peer inside.

http://www.ocweekly.com/ink/04/13/news-arellano.php
Link is dead. The cited webpage can be accessed via the Wayback Machine:

https://web.archive.org/web/20031206034814/https://ocweekly.com/ink/04/13/news-arellano.php

A later revised version can be found at:

https://ocweekly.com/the-bawdy-of-christ-6426269/

Picture on source page.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A wooden Dionysian Christ...

Objecting to the clean-shaven, short haired depiction is a little rich given that the earliest extant images show him thus. But I don't recall seeing a 5th century Byzantine or Gothic Christos with a stalk :)

All rather odd...
 
Oy vey!

(I have to agree with former Bishop McFarland -- in my opinion it's a lousy painting. Also, and this is just my opinion, now, the ray of light coming from the area of the penis really makes it worse.)
 
No such mural currently exists at St. Joseph's Church in Santa Ana.

If any photos of the mural accompanied the article cited in post #1, they're gone now.
 
Last edited:
No such mural currently exists at St. Joseph's Church in Santa Ana.

If any photos of the mural accompanied the article cited in post #1, they're gone now.

Article with image here:
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2007/09_10/2003_12_04_Arellano_TheBawdy.htm

2003_12_04_Arellano_TheBawdy_ph_1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you're still hungry for pictures of a tumescent son of God, check out 'Jesus With Erection', published in the wake of the Muhammad cartoons row.
 
Give it a week and I'm sure few of them will even remember. :rim:
 
"muscular Christianity"

On the original Santa Ana mural - was it painted with intent to look like genitalia?

I ask because I had to read the text to find out what the problem was (what can I say? I must have had a very sheltered life :rollingw: ) On first sight I thuoght "Oh! instead of modesty drapery the artist has put the Holy Spirit Dove."

Which isn't a great look either tbh!
 
I also remember a particularly buff jesus in the mormon centre (IIRC) on Exhibition Road, London.
 
Good grief- can someone please explain whether 'boner Jesus' is some form of semi-covert calculated blasphemy, or is his erected depiction somehow canonical with gospel?

Why am I reminded of the British Israelites? Ah...maybe I'm getting mixed-up with the Rude Man of Cerne....
 
Good grief- can someone please explain whether 'boner Jesus' is some form of semi-covert calculated blasphemy, or is his erected depiction somehow canonical with gospel?

Do you mean the one with the stomach muscles that can also be viewed as...? Standard iconography which we read differently I suspect.
 
I'm meaning the whole subset of artistic depictions of Christ in an apparent state of semi-arousal. Is this somehow perfectly-fine within eg Catholicism?
 
Going by the current news items, it probably is.

'Rationalwiki'

First I've heard of it.
 
I'm meaning the whole subset of artistic depictions of Christ in an apparent state of semi-arousal. Is this somehow perfectly-fine within eg Catholicism?

It is intended to be read as virility, strength, power - if you mean the ones with folds of drapery and so on. Medieval and Ren. One of them is the stylised way of drawing muscles. That on is most porbably just us! Honi Soit Qui Mal y Pense :)

I have no views on the more modern examples above. And, as I say somewhere, I'm wondering of the Santa Anna one is quite as it seems :)
 
Frideswide,

That Latin didn't translate. (the 'honi' at the start threw it.)

Did you mean Qui cogitat mala esse malus
 
Frideswide,

That Latin didn't translate. (the 'honi' at the start threw it.)

Did you mean Qui cogitat mala esse malus


Honi soit qui mal y pense is a French maxim used as the motto of the British chivalric Order of the Garter. It is translated as "May he be shamed who thinks badly of it" or "Shame be to him who thinks evil of it" or "Evil be to him that evil thinks.
 
Gordonrutter,

Interesting.

If I translate that phrase from French to English I get ...Honi Be Who Evil Thinks .

Got to admit I took it to be Latin.
 
It's medieval french :)
 
Do you mean the one with the stomach muscles that can also be viewed as...? Standard iconography which we read differently I suspect.
Are they stomach muscles or a bit of cloth?

EDIT: A colour version removes the ambiguity.

maerten-jacobsz-van-heemskerck-christ-the-man-of-sorrows.jpg


The same artist (Maarten van Heemskerck) did quite a few kind of sexy pictures of Christ's agony:

Man_of_Sorrows.jpg

Christus_als_man_van_smarten_Rijksmuseum_SK-A-1306.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top