BS3
Abominable Showman
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2021
- Messages
- 1,869
I'm starting this thread as a place to dump comments about the many UFO crash stories that aren't Roswell (or Aztec) dotted around the US, particularly the southwestern US deserts.
The phrase "crash/retrieval syndrome" was coined by Leonard Stringfield and seems quite appropriate, given that these stories often feature groups of associated elements that recur in different cases. Examples might be:
- An atomic connection, eg testing
- The military recovery team who arrive quite early on, as if they have foreknowledge of the crash
- The topography of the crash site, with the craft embedded in a dry watercourse or hillside, sometimes with occupants scattered around it, sometimes with a remaining live occupant
- Usually some confirmatory, specific detail about the craft, eg shape or markings
- Roadblocks / threatened residents
- A convoy of recovery vehicles, and a 'craft' sheeted over on a flatbed
- The witness pressed into guard duty, either of the craft or dead occupants
- Wright-Patterson involvement
...and so on.
Stringfield didn't offer so much comment on the truth of the stories when he collected dozens of them in the 1970s. Why should UFOs crash so much? Most of the tales are widely judged to be total rubbish from the perspective of 'reality'. It's difficult to work out if people are simply copying Roswell, copying other widely circulated early accounts, or if something else is going on. My own favourite theory (which I should add isn't my theory) is that the different stories draw on some fundamental human symbolism - the psychological explanation - probably relating to anxieties around the atomic bomb and technology generally. ETH proponents might prefer to suggest that all the stories point to some real incident lying behind them, whereas Vallee (in his book about the Trinity crash) suggests that at least one crash was real but was itself 'symbolic'.
Typically our own UK example (Berwyn) happens up a damp Welsh mountain.
More interesting examples to come.
The phrase "crash/retrieval syndrome" was coined by Leonard Stringfield and seems quite appropriate, given that these stories often feature groups of associated elements that recur in different cases. Examples might be:
- An atomic connection, eg testing
- The military recovery team who arrive quite early on, as if they have foreknowledge of the crash
- The topography of the crash site, with the craft embedded in a dry watercourse or hillside, sometimes with occupants scattered around it, sometimes with a remaining live occupant
- Usually some confirmatory, specific detail about the craft, eg shape or markings
- Roadblocks / threatened residents
- A convoy of recovery vehicles, and a 'craft' sheeted over on a flatbed
- The witness pressed into guard duty, either of the craft or dead occupants
- Wright-Patterson involvement
...and so on.
Stringfield didn't offer so much comment on the truth of the stories when he collected dozens of them in the 1970s. Why should UFOs crash so much? Most of the tales are widely judged to be total rubbish from the perspective of 'reality'. It's difficult to work out if people are simply copying Roswell, copying other widely circulated early accounts, or if something else is going on. My own favourite theory (which I should add isn't my theory) is that the different stories draw on some fundamental human symbolism - the psychological explanation - probably relating to anxieties around the atomic bomb and technology generally. ETH proponents might prefer to suggest that all the stories point to some real incident lying behind them, whereas Vallee (in his book about the Trinity crash) suggests that at least one crash was real but was itself 'symbolic'.
Typically our own UK example (Berwyn) happens up a damp Welsh mountain.
More interesting examples to come.