Paul_Exeter
Justified & Ancient
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 3,906
Some valid points.As a child of the 1960s in Britain, I can say with certainty that we were frequently, and collectively, influenced hugely by television. Even those who weren't viewers themselves (eg their families not being able to affort to buy or rent a TV) were aware of, and often influenced by, group chat about images / programmes / themes being discussed in front of them. This was also magnified hugely by media cross-overs, with TV content being covered in newspapers / magazines / comics (cf comic-books) and the seminal Commonwealth staple of "the annuals" (perennial hard-back collections of TV themed and comic-stripped stories).
School was almost always verbal and numerical: fiction / fun and imagination was largely visual. And in 1960s Britain, TV fed that appetite hugely. Here are a few 1967 British TV schedules, chosen to fairly-represent content these children would have seen in the days up to the Studham Common sighting:
View attachment 53058 View attachment 53061
View attachment 53062
Take 'The Man From Uncle'.....here are some black-and-white screenshots taken from the above specific episode that some (or all) of these children almost-certainly would've seen in the days leading up to the reported sighting.....look at these in the context of the blue/grey fuzzy pictures that old, small television sets produced in the 1960s, and consider that these children (if they did see this programme, or something similar) might never have seen imagery like it before, ever, in their lives before.
View attachment 53063
View attachment 53065
View attachment 53066
View attachment 53067
View attachment 53068
Perhaps it's an overly-simplistic / reductionist thesis: but could the specific content they'd seen on TV, perhaps very-shortly before the shared/reported experience occurred for them, have influenced them to have believed they had seen what they said they had?
If this broad (and boring) explanation is worthy of at least some consideration, I've got an alternative (and perhaps even better) TV iconic suspect than "The Men From UNCLE" - but we'll see what the reaction of the forum is to my above musings first.
I've found the 2016 FT article BS3 flagged up in which Alex Butler, one of the original witnesses, came forward after so many years. He mentions that visibility was poor that afternoon and to his credit even admits they may have mistaken a fellow pupil in the school's blue uniform for something unearthly. At this moment in time I feel they may witnessed a strange lightning-related blue plasma phenomena that their young minds then interpreted as something they had read about or seen on tv, so I would welcome more of your thoughts.
Last edited: