marhawkman
Justified & Ancient
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
- Messages
- 1,539
interesting picture. is that some sort of flying toy?
Apparently it is a 3D printed model of the object he saw.interesting picture. is that some sort of flying toy?
The problem here, personally, just has that 'sense' of being straightforward, as claimed:A fake is more likely.
Enh having a witness say "I know I took pictures of something real" doesn't really say anything about what they took pictures of. If all they did was photograph a light in the sky, there's not much reason to favor their interpretation of what the subject of the photo is.The problem here, personally, just has that 'sense' of being straightforward, as claimed:
"The husband of Battle Ground resident Nicole Keller captured this image of strange lights in the sky with his cellphone Monday. He didn't want his name used in the paper, she said".
"Nicole Keller, the Battle Ground woman whose husband took the pictures, has insisted from the beginning that they are real".
Absolutely not at all - merely whatever is depicted I would expect is genuine and not manipulated.Enh having a witness say "I know I took pictures of something real" doesn't really say anything about what they took pictures of.
I don't think that is what is going on in this picture. It looks very much like the product of a basic I-Phone app; adding triangles to an image for a joke. The person claiming this is real is the wife, not the husband who took the picture. It's as fake as those hearts and flowers you get on Iphone images.Absolutely not at all - merely whatever is depicted I would expect is genuine and not manipulated.
Now that you mention it... the red dots are LESS blurry than the rest of the picture.I don't think that is what is going on in this picture. It looks very much like the product of a basic I-Phone app; adding triangles to an image for a joke. The person claiming this is real is the wife, not the husband who took the picture. It's as fake as those hearts and flowers you get on Iphone images.
Seems that this Object has an accompanying UFO which appears from nowhere?Can't find, as yet, the video I was looking for, however came across this film for the first time.
This is the background story:
View attachment 20280
This is the footage.
A deeply profound hmmmm... here.
It's precisely the type of supporting evidence... I wondered if it existed.
Just 'too good' though?
Is there something to it all though?One good, non-faked picture would be nice.
It has and thought had been resolved - this is an unwelcome surprise.find it very difficult to navigate your posts ..., because the images are all so large. I think this has been pointed out before.
As opposed to a photograph, obviously sure.The problem is that this is a reconstruction, an artist's impression, so is pretty much useless as evidence.
Having been a while since I last went in search of a new, 'triangular UFO report', by way of an experiment I had confidence in finding a new and recent account without much difficulty.Evidence needs to be better than this to stand up to scrutiny.
Have you found any reports with good corroborative evidence? It does seem strange that these huge constructions can't be photographed.Having been a while since I last went in search of a new, 'triangular UFO report', by way of an experiment I had confidence in finding a new and recent account without much difficulty.
I’ve seen a flying triangle, or to be precise the silhouette of one against moonlit clouds. It was between cloud layers so I assume it was large and distant rather than small and close.Have you found any reports with good corroborative evidence? It does seem strange that these huge constructions can't be photographed.
This happens a LOT, even outside UFO stuff. You think "whoa cool!" then think "I should film this" right after it's too late.I’ve seen a flying triangle, or to be precise the silhouette of one against moonlit clouds. It was between cloud layers so I assume it was large and distant rather than small and close.
It was clear as day a triangle, no running lights and moving really slowly. Even though it was in sight for minutes not only did I fail to get a camera I didn’t even call any family out to see it. Only afterwards did I think “damn why didn’t I grab a picture”.
I wish I had seen it.I’ve seen a flying triangle, or to be precise the silhouette of one against moonlit clouds. It was between cloud layers so I assume it was large and distant rather than small and close.
It was clear as day a triangle, no running lights and moving really slowly. Even though it was in sight for minutes not only did I fail to get a camera I didn’t even call any family out to see it. Only afterwards did I think “damn why didn’t I grab a picture”.
Could be, I have no reason to believe it was an extra terrestrial craft. The point you seemed to miss was that at no point did I take a picture or alert others to see it, which was addressing your post.I wish I had seen it.
Of course, I would probably have identified it as a triangular cloud, and I would probably have been correct. A large, slow-moving object silhouetted between clouds is also probably a cloud.
One night I watched a battle between two clouds, shaped something like battleships, silhouetted against the Moon; one of the clouds gradually tilted out of sight, as if the other one had sunk it. Fascinating.
There is a whole segment of the Cloud Appreciation Society dedicated to clouds that look like things.