eburacum
Papo-furado
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2005
- Messages
- 5,817
The clips shown in that article are the GIMBAL and GOFAST clips from 2015, so either the Independent has got the date wrong, or they are talking about a completely different event. I'd like to see what NASA make of those clips, which seem to be quite mundane when you analyse them thoroughly.
A completely dispassionate analysis would probably show that GIMBAL is an Earthly plane about 12/15km from the camera, and GOFAST is a small object about the size of a bird or balloon, halfway between the camera and the sea. Hopefully a NASA analysis could narrow these parameters down considerably.
Even better would ba an analysis by a competent but independent scientist, like the analysis that Richard Feynman made of the O-Ring problem in the Challenger disaster. It took an outside expert to expose the flaws in NASA's 'safety culture'.
I suspect that one reason that we are getting a lot of UAP reports now is that the US Navy currently has a predominant 'culture' that tends to accept eye-witness reports from pilots, whereas the movie clips and photos do not sufficiently corroborate those reports to be convincing.
A completely dispassionate analysis would probably show that GIMBAL is an Earthly plane about 12/15km from the camera, and GOFAST is a small object about the size of a bird or balloon, halfway between the camera and the sea. Hopefully a NASA analysis could narrow these parameters down considerably.
Even better would ba an analysis by a competent but independent scientist, like the analysis that Richard Feynman made of the O-Ring problem in the Challenger disaster. It took an outside expert to expose the flaws in NASA's 'safety culture'.
I suspect that one reason that we are getting a lot of UAP reports now is that the US Navy currently has a predominant 'culture' that tends to accept eye-witness reports from pilots, whereas the movie clips and photos do not sufficiently corroborate those reports to be convincing.