Bigphoot2
Not sprouts! I hate sprouts.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2005
- Messages
- 11,095
The pic on the documentary reminded me of that poster.
Enhancing his reputation as "Britain's Fox Mulder"
The pic on the documentary reminded me of that poster.
Before I read this thread, I had downloaded this programme, and after 10 minutes switched it off and deleted it. To me it was just a case of same old, same old.
I'm sorry, I didn't see this program, but if the witnesses and photos vanished, how does anyone know?Apart from the UFO that was seen and photographed in the Scottish highlands (but the witnesses and photographs have vanished and the newspaper that was originally given the story seems to have amnesia) there was nothing that hasn't been gone over before.
I'm sorry, I didn't see this program, but if the witnesses and photos vanished, how does anyone know?
That photo was confiscated, so we only have Pope's word for it.Luckily Nick Pope remembered it in great detail, even had a copy of the photograph on the wall of his office.
Why was that?sadly the man who made this masterpiece, michael hesemann, has exited ufology for good
so an sequel is very unlikely
Why was that?
Some fascinating footage there.
Later in his career he turned to topics related to Catholicism.
he turned into an official archivist of the vaticanWhy was that?
Some fascinating footage there.
yup
as for it being fascinating exactlyWhy was that?
Some fascinating footage there.
but thats exactly the point of the documentary, an unfiltered unbiased compilation of pre-cgi ufosI don't see any attempt by Hesemann to explain those images; some of them are fakes (the Billy Meier ones for instance) and some are very easy to explain (i.e. the STS ice particles). I suppose he thinks that by displaying lots and lots of unfiltered evidence then some good stuff might be included just by chance. I think it just makes him look like an idiot.
and also there is lots of good stuff in it, and this kinda makes up for the hoaxesI don't see any attempt by Hesemann to explain those images; some of them are fakes (the Billy Meier ones for instance) and some are very easy to explain (i.e. the STS ice particles). I suppose he thinks that by displaying lots and lots of unfiltered evidence then some good stuff might be included just by chance. I think it just makes him look like an idiot.
Right. Didn't notice date! Thanks.These were released two years ago